Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

WWE


lharris92

Recommended Posts

Edge-Orton, Lesnar-Drew builds both have me hooked to be fair, I feel like the Ripley-Charlotte feud needs more Bianca Belair, and the Reigns-Goldberg feud just isn't going to be good (just have a quick match, try to do what Lesnar-Goldberg was a couple of years ago, quick and exciting). Lynch and Baszler is a strange one because I liked Baszler in NXT but I'm worried she's going to become the latest victim of main roster booking..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't really follow WWE closely at all, but do they seem to be trying to up their game in light of AEW's relative success? I know they've stacked NXT recently with some big main roster names, but has it forced any real change of pace/booking? 

Will be very interesting to see how it plays out long term. AEW have really managed to iron out their issues and it seems they have the long term backing of a major TV network as well as very stable management with extremely deep pockets. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, WS_Jack_III said:

Empty arena Wrestlemania at the performance center, wow.

That really defeats the point of ‘mania though, I can understand that you can’t reschedule it as there’s storylines involved for multiple weekly shows but half the fun is the crowd and the over the top entrances. It’s shit for all of the Indy wrestling shows that put on side events at ‘mania weekend.

i hope since it’s just an empty arena they aren’t going to do a half a day show, they are too long as it is and it will just highlight how awkward the situation is.

Edited by jump
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DareToDibble said:

These shows in the performance centre have been horrible to watch. I wonder if they’ll do “live” or pre-record and stitch stuff together?

Gutted for Drew, looking like he’s winning the title in front of nobody.

Hopefully he'll be squashed in 2 minutes. The ultimate "you deserve it" guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, The Nal said:

Hopefully he'll be squashed in 2 minutes. The ultimate "you deserve it" guy.

I really like him. Since turning face you’ve been able to see more of his actual personality come through which has been great. Should maybe have been done a bit earlier but still. 

After his match with Rowan last week (more the actions around Rowan’s “pet”) I can’t see anything other than him getting involved in the match at Mania.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, jump said:

That really defeats the point of ‘mania though, I can understand that you can’t reschedule it as there’s storylines involved for multiple weekly shows but half the fun is the crowd and the over the top entrances. It’s shit for all of the Indy wrestling shows that put on side events at ‘mania weekend.

i hope since it’s just an empty arena they aren’t going to do a half a day show, they are too long as it is and it will just highlight how awkward the situation is.

forever known as the empty mania, going to be so weird. So glad I didn't end up getting tickets now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it is a terrible idea. It won’t be Mania. You need a crowd. I wonder if they can fill the PC with their own talent and staff? But then again, that’s a gathering.
 

Edge making his big return after 9 years away to absolutely zero crowd reaction. It’s just a poor idea to me. Postpone it until later this year. 

Edited by Andre91
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a guess because they weren’t explicitly told to cancel  ‘mania by the government if they were to break any contracts related to it they would be held liable for damages so if they do it elsewhere they can meet their obligations and then make a proper ‘mania latter.

i found it odd on Raw that they could of wasted a few mins on The Undertakers entrance which doesn’t really depend on the audience but he just charged down to the ring whilst half the show was a replay of the Royal Rumble.

Edited by jump
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Suppose they're damned if they do, damned if they don't. They can't just press pause on every storyline for 3 months but then the payoff to them is meant to be the pinnacle of the year. 

Unless there is some bananas tech they can pull off, I dunno, live streaming an audience in from home via green screen or something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone see this week's Dynamite? Gutted the Brodie Lee/Matt Hardy debuts couldn't get the huge pop they would have done. Otherwise I thought it was a nigh on perfect episode given the circumstances. Having the full setup including pyro etc worked, especially having the hard cam facing the entrance/ramp rather than empty seats. Having the remaining roster as the audience provided a touch of atmosphere at least and made for some good spots too.

If they can carry on in the same vein then it could be huge for them. Obviously that depends entirely on circumstances out of their hands, but if WWE are gonna run shows that are basically vignettes and 1/2 matches then AEW could attract some brand new fans simply by running a 'normal' show albeit with no real audience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, kingbadger said:

Anyone see this week's Dynamite? Gutted the Brodie Lee/Matt Hardy debuts couldn't get the huge pop they would have done. Otherwise I thought it was a nigh on perfect episode given the circumstances. Having the full setup including pyro etc worked, especially having the hard cam facing the entrance/ramp rather than empty seats. Having the remaining roster as the audience provided a touch of atmosphere at least and made for some good spots too.

If they can carry on in the same vein then it could be huge for them. Obviously that depends entirely on circumstances out of their hands, but if WWE are gonna run shows that are basically vignettes and 1/2 matches then AEW could attract some brand new fans simply by running a 'normal' show albeit with no real audience.

I saw the Matt Hardy clip and felt gutted there was no pop

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/20/2020 at 2:09 PM, kingbadger said:

Anyone see this week's Dynamite? Gutted the Brodie Lee/Matt Hardy debuts couldn't get the huge pop they would have done. Otherwise I thought it was a nigh on perfect episode given the circumstances. Having the full setup including pyro etc worked, especially having the hard cam facing the entrance/ramp rather than empty seats. Having the remaining roster as the audience provided a touch of atmosphere at least and made for some good spots too.

If they can carry on in the same vein then it could be huge for them. Obviously that depends entirely on circumstances out of their hands, but if WWE are gonna run shows that are basically vignettes and 1/2 matches then AEW could attract some brand new fans simply by running a 'normal' show albeit with no real audience.

 

On 3/20/2020 at 11:35 PM, WS_Jack_III said:

I saw the Matt Hardy clip and felt gutted there was no pop

I've been meaning to get into AEW for a while now. One of my mates keeps telling me how good they are. Where/how can we watch it in the UK? Is it available on catch up?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, DareToDibble said:

 

I've been meaning to get into AEW for a while now. One of my mates keeps telling me how good they are. Where/how can we watch it in the UK? Is it available on catch up?

It was being shown on ITV4 I think, maybe some episodes are on the ITV hub?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What the fuck is a boneyard match? With all the gimmick matches associated with 'taker already they don't really need to create new ones. This feud is starting to feel like when DDP joined WWF and they started focusing on 'takers wife.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, jump said:

Apparently former Tory MP Edwina Currie saw a clip on twitter of the Stone Cold and Booker T supermarket fight and thought it was a real fight over panic buying in Asda so she started tweeting about how disgusting the country has become.

That brings back great memories. That was classic stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

‘mania in a few days...it’s probably the least hyped I’ve ever felt for it. I am hoping with Reigns out his replacement against Goldberg is gonna be something unique, like pushing someone like Big E or Braun rather than having him home squash a mid-carder.

The women’s tag match (Asuka has been great recently), Sami vs Bryan and Edge vs Orton should be good and depending on what a Firefly Funhouse actually is Cena vs Bray might be a laugh. 

Edited by jump
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, the lack of a crowd hurts. They should look back at the attitude era when loads of the fights were backstage, in parking lots etc and do more backstages interviews. Although I do find Niki Cross funny as she keeps playing to the crowd who aren’t there.

Pink Triangle should be happy there’s no crowd chanting at the moment though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...