Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

WWE


lharris92

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, DareToDibble said:

I've completely stopped watching at the moment. Just catching up with what's happening online. It really doesn't come across well at all without fans so I'm amazed they're still going ahead with it.

I would have thought its contractual in terms of them having to produce content.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jump said:

Yeah, the lack of a crowd hurts. They should look back at the attitude era when loads of the fights were backstage, in parking lots etc and do more backstages interviews. Although I do find Niki Cross funny as she keeps playing to the crowd who aren’t there.

Pink Triangle should be happy there’s no crowd chanting at the moment though.

I like crowd involvement in general as long as the words what, deserve and awesome are not involved!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think about it though, even when a crowd is there and they aren't in to it, totally kills the vibe. Part of the reason this two day thing could benefit Mania if they maintain it going forward. Split it to two 3 hour shows, crowd won't be zapped after 7 hours of wrestling like they can be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, WS_Jack_III said:

Think about it though, even when a crowd is there and they aren't in to it, totally kills the vibe. Part of the reason this two day thing could benefit Mania if they maintain it going forward. Split it to two 3 hour shows, crowd won't be zapped after 7 hours of wrestling like they can be.

Or they could do 1 3-4 hour show. I think we need to get away from the idea more is better. When wrestling was popular they managed fine doing this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, WS_Jack_III said:

Think about it though, even when a crowd is there and they aren't in to it, totally kills the vibe. Part of the reason this two day thing could benefit Mania if they maintain it going forward. Split it to two 3 hour shows, crowd won't be zapped after 7 hours of wrestling like they can be.

Yeah, it worked well for New Japan who split their mega show Wrestle Kingdom into two nights before WWE, and they haven't even got the roster and returning "legends" depth of them. However it's the same old WWE who for the last few years can't create stars and have good feuds and having a long show highlights how shit and filler things are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, WS_Jack_III said:

I've been listening to Jim Cornette's podcast thingy and some of the stories about Vince are amazing. He's so weird!

Will have to have a listen. I remember listening to Dean Ambrose on Chris Jericho’s podcast just afternoon his AEW debut and they both slated Vince.

Any particular highlights from the Jim Cornette one?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've always found Cornette too much of a c**t to be taken seriously.

I go through phases of listening to the Bruce Prichard, Eric Bischoff and Chris Jericho podcasts. The Bruce and Bischoff ones are good as it's more of an examination and backstage titbits of what was happening at the time and Jericho is very dependant on the guest as sometimes it's shit and other time it's great. Jericho recently had Brodie Lee/Luke Harper on and it's similar to the Jon Moxley/Dean Ambrose tell all but not quite as ferocious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jump said:

I've always found Cornette too much of a c**t to be taken seriously.

I go through phases of listening to the Bruce Prichard, Eric Bischoff and Chris Jericho podcasts. The Bruce and Bischoff ones are good as it's more of an examination and backstage titbits of what was happening at the time and Jericho is very dependant on the guest as sometimes it's shit and other time it's great. Jericho recently had Brodie Lee/Luke Harper on and it's similar to the Jon Moxley/Dean Ambrose tell all but not quite as ferocious.

I like the Austin one as i like his style and find Jericho a bit annoying at times. However again it is very guest/topic dependent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, DareToDibble said:

Will have to have a listen. I remember listening to Dean Ambrose on Chris Jericho’s podcast just afternoon his AEW debut and they both slated Vince.

Any particular highlights from the Jim Cornette one?

There's little snippets on his official YouTube so you won't have to go through full episodes but one he talks about a meeting at Vince's and a TV repair guy turns up, Vince points him to the room with the TV and says "In there buddy, there's no sound" the TV repair guy returns 30 seconds later with the remote and tells Vince it was on mute.

He doesn't like people sneezing and doesn't understand how people get ill. He used to leave rental cars wherever the hell he wanted, just ditched the cars. 

 

It's not really slating him more just pointing out how odd the bloke is.

 

edit: oh and a longer segment about the words banned from WWE TV. That one is great, shows you why Cole sounds so odd at time. Medical facility instead of hospital being the key one you'll hear.

2 hours ago, jump said:

I've always found Cornette too much of a c**t to be taken seriously.

I could listen to him talk all day, don't agree with 50% of what he says but he says it well.

Edited by WS_Jack_III
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, WS_Jack_III said:

There's little snippets on his official YouTube so you won't have to go through full episodes but one he talks about a meeting at Vince's and a TV repair guy turns up, Vince points him to the room with the TV and says "In there buddy, there's no sound" the TV repair guy returns 30 seconds later with the remote and tells Vince it was on mute.

He doesn't like people sneezing and doesn't understand how people get ill. He used to leave rental cars wherever the hell he wanted, just ditched the cars. 

 

It's not really slating him more just pointing out how odd the bloke is.

 

edit: oh and a longer segment about the words banned from WWE TV. That one is great, shows you why Cole sounds so odd at time. Medical facility instead of hospital being the key one you'll hear.

I could listen to him talk all day, don't agree with 50% of what he says but he says it well.

I think a lot of the world's geniuses (past and present) have had an eccentric side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bike 'taker was good to see again, especially as he seemed more like the nasty hardcore champ 'taker. I was a bit disappointed he has Metallica instead of Limp Bizkit for his music now though. I don't get the druids though, have they turned on him since he's no longer the Deadman version?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, jump said:

Bike 'taker was good to see again, especially as he seemed more like the nasty hardcore champ 'taker. I was a bit disappointed he has Metallica instead of Limp Bizkit for his music now though. I don't get the druids though, have they turned on him since he's no longer the Deadman version?

 

I've come around to the new theme a bit, I was initially disappointed. I wasn't sure about that bit either, i'd have done away with the teleportation stuff and the fire raising but all round I loved it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Boneyard Match was utterly ridiculous and I loved it. I had so much fun watching it. I marked out like hell when I heard the motorcycle approaching. I think the Metallica theme is great for this version of Taker. The Deadman character was put to bed last night and I’m fully behind it. 
 

I think we could definitely see Taker vs. Sting shot in that style. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Andre91 said:

The Boneyard Match was utterly ridiculous and I loved it. I had so much fun watching it. I marked out like hell when I heard the motorcycle approaching. I think the Metallica theme is great for this version of Taker. The Deadman character was put to bed last night and I’m fully behind it. 
 

I think we could definitely see Taker vs. Sting shot in that style. 

Someone beat me to it and recut the entrance with "Rollin'" and then another with "You're gonna pay" on twitter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, DareToDibble said:

Has anyone seen the Cena/Wyatt stuff from last night yet? It's absolutely fantastic! 😂

Genuinely might be my favourite 'match' I've watched for a long time. Fair play to WWE. They were in a weird as hell situation but in my opinion they gave us one of the better Wrestlemanias, especially in recent history. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NerdsNatterings said:

Genuinely might be my favourite 'match' I've watched for a long time. Fair play to WWE. They were in a weird as hell situation but in my opinion they gave us one of the better Wrestlemanias, especially in recent history. 

Yeah pre-recording and being able to edit it to their hearts content definitely helped. I actually think my 2 favourite matches were the Taker/Styles and Cena/Wyatt matches. Not sure how much of it was down to Cena/Wyatt and how much was down to WWE Creative but whoever it was they absolutely smashed it out of the park!

Good storytelling in Edge/Orton but at 37 minutes I think it was a little too long.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, DareToDibble said:

Yeah pre-recording and being able to edit it to their hearts content definitely helped. I actually think my 2 favourite matches were the Taker/Styles and Cena/Wyatt matches. Not sure how much of it was down to Cena/Wyatt and how much was down to WWE Creative but whoever it was they absolutely smashed it out of the park!

Good storytelling in Edge/Orton but at 37 minutes I think it was a little too long.

Yeah a bit too long for me although I did enjoy it (just really should've been 5,10 minutes less). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Andre91 said:

Edge vs. Orton was one of the worst WrestleMania matches I’ve ever seen. 

Orton is taking over the mantle from Triple H for too fucking long 'mania matches.

I loved the Otis vs Ziggler and Cena vs Wyatt matches. Also we have the first British WWE champion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funhouse was just... so odd. I don't know what to think of it. Otis and Drew deserved big pops. Edge & Orton was okay but far too long and the commentators were weird for it. Also, I didn't think of this but seen others saying the hanging in the gym equipment was a little insensitive considering history.

 

I think overall they pulled it off over the two nights against the odds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, WS_Jack_III said:

Edge & Orton was okay but far too long and the commentators were weird for it. Also, I didn't think of this but seen others saying the hanging in the gym equipment was a little insensitive considering history.

I've seen this said by a lot of people. I watched "live" so was pretty tired which may be why I missed it. I'm going to rewatch parts of it and listen properly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
    • We had a really good weekend this year. This was our 2nd year after giving it a go last year with 3 year old twins (we do Glasto but don't take the kids and have no plans to in the distant future!!).   Highlights of the weekend for me was Peter Hook & the Light, English Teacher, Flaming Lips, Adult DVD and Alex James (I get the karaoke thing but I still thought it was great). Missed loads of acts we wanted to see due to having two kids in tow but overall we left happy with what we managed to see across the weekend. Some great food vendors, good to see Steak Frites make an appearance this year, one of my faves from Glasto. Festival is really well run, toilets remained clean and stocked with loo roll all weekend, even on Sunday night/Monday morning. The walk from the cars is a ballache but it is what it is, arriving Thursday evening meant we were parked as far away as you could be.   My only gripe is that there seems to be a trend of parents letting their teenagers camp completely separately to them in family camping. We had a large group of 15-17 year olds near us who came home pissed up every evening at 3-4am being really loud and annoying! I get that it's a festival etc but I think it's taking the piss a bit letting your kids camp separately and disrupt everyone else.   All in all we had a really good time and are looking forward to next year.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...