Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

WWE


lharris92

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, DareToDibble said:

Reading a lot of rumours that Cody leaving is just a work. I can't see it myself. 
On the note of him coming back to WWE - may very well be happening but isn't he still on the board of AEW? I'm sure he was EVP. How would that work if he's still in that role?

Certain it's not a work, his EVP status expired when his contract did at the end of 2021. Though the roles all the EVPs have in the company was scaled back quite a while ago when Khan took over as head booker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm really not sure Austin is the kinda guy who would necessarily clamour for one last match. I'm sure he's had thousands in Saudi blood money offered to him in the past and said no. Rumour persisting it would be Austin v Goldberg, couldn't think of a worse opponent for someone with the neck issues Austin has. 

WWE clamouring for another old timer to come back only for them to bury a current worker on the roster would be far for the course. Yes it's Austin, but the fact WWE are hell bent on making sure everyone knows 'sports entertainment' isn't and won't ever be as good as it was in the 90s is killing the business more than any Young Bucks spamming of super kicks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, pink_triangle said:

If that happens will it really matter in the long run? People will moan online, but their reputations will be intact and the wrestlers get a good payday. 

If Austin has a poor match it won't taint his legacy one bit. He will still be remembered as one of the great WWE wrestlers, for legendary feuds with Vince and Rock and (in my view) the greatest match of all time with Brett Hart. 

I don't give a shit about his legacy. I'm tired of seeing these piss poor old timers in piss poor matches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, jump said:

The entrance and personality is one thing but they will give Austin 30 mins matches and it will show how out of it he his as they haven't learnt their lessons from all the old timers from the last few years. 

Oh yeah they'll overbook it to hell. Or at least that will be their first instinct. I forgot about the Bret/Vince match until this thread, but good grief.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Padjeq said:

Oh yeah they'll overbook it to hell. Or at least that will be their first instinct. I forgot about the Bret/Vince match until this thread, but good grief.

The funny thing is even though Bret didn’t really wrestle In that match as he was in the match he lost his massive insurance payout. He should just not have bothered coming back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, jump said:

I don't give a shit about his legacy. I'm tired of seeing these piss poor old timers in piss poor matches.

At the end of the day they won't care what you or I think, they will do what's best for business. Match quality has never been the main focus of the WWE. They can put 2 of these greatest workers to have the greatest match and it won't move the needle. Their judgement is someone like Austin would make money for them. If Austin was announced for a match I would sign up again to the network, whether enough would who knows.

I cant see it happening, but would be loved to be proven wrong.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, pink_triangle said:

At the end of the day they won't care what you or I think, they will do what's best for business. Match quality has never been the main focus of the WWE. They can put 2 of these greatest workers to have the greatest match and it won't move the needle. Their judgement is someone like Austin would make money for them. If Austin was announced for a match I would sign up again to the network, whether enough would who knows.

I cant see it happening, but would be loved to be proven wrong.

 

Christ, why does every conversation with you amounts to don't say anything bad about WWE’s product because of “business” even though the quality of the product is now so bad EVEN you have stopped watching? 😜 

I might have been excited for Austin if they know how to manage the old timers correctly to cover up their shortcomings  like short matches, don't over book it, don’t have Goldberg nearly kill people etc but instead it is Goldberg nearly killing people, way too long HHH matches, The Bret vs Vince mess, The Crown Jewel shit with Shawn Michaels etc. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jump said:

Christ, why does every conversation with you amounts to don't say anything bad about WWE’s product because of “business” even though the quality of the product is now so bad EVEN you have stopped watching? 😜 

I might have been excited for Austin if they know how to manage the old timers correctly to cover up their shortcomings  like short matches, don't over book it, don’t have Goldberg nearly kill people etc but instead it is Goldberg nearly killing people, way too long HHH matches, The Bret vs Vince mess, The Crown Jewel shit with Shawn Michaels etc. 

I'm just pointing out that Vince doesn't see quality of wrestling matches as his main priority. It isn't the priority for me either. I didn't stop watching because of the quality of the matches, the average star rating is no doubt more than my peak year which were WrestleMania 12 to 19. I stopped watching because I didn't care about the wrestlers or the storylines, didn't care who won or lost. Not that I don't care about match quality Austin v Brett is my favourite ever.

As I have said if Austin returns I sign back up and probably end up staying for a bit catching up on what I have missed in the last few years. Maybe get hooked again and maybe not. I perfectly accept fans like me may be close to extinction and maybe it won't work. My guess is it won't happen and Austin is just being a good self publicist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, pink_triangle said:

I'm just pointing out that Vince doesn't see quality of wrestling matches as his main priority. It isn't the priority for me either. I didn't stop watching because of the quality of the matches, the average star rating is no doubt more than my peak year which were WrestleMania 12 to 19. I stopped watching because I didn't care about the wrestlers or the storylines, didn't care who won or lost. Not that I don't care about match quality Austin v Brett is my favourite ever.

As I have said if Austin returns I sign back up and probably end up staying for a bit catching up on what I have missed in the last few years. Maybe get hooked again and maybe not. I perfectly accept fans like me may be close to extinction and maybe it won't work. My guess is it won't happen and Austin is just being a good self publicist.

We aren't talking about having a great match or even a passable match, we are talking about complete and utter shit shows which these old timers keeping having over and over which is actually damaging the product. The people who watched again for Shawn Michaels knocking off Kane's wig or Goldberg botching so bad that he could have killed someone shit shows returns didn't stick around or even keep the regular fans as you can tell be the plummeting viewership and the cancelation of The WWE Network. It's all short term bollocks which doesn't address the issue.

Edited by jump
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jump said:

We aren't talking about having a great match or even a passable match, we are talking about complete and utter shit shows which these old timers keeping having over and over which is actually damaging the product. The people who watched again for Shawn Michaels knocking off Kane's wig or Goldberg botching so bad that he could have killed someone shit shows returns didn't stick around or even keep the regular fans as you can tell be the plummeting viewership and the cancelation of The WWE Network. It's all short term bollocks which doesn't address the issue.

Is it really damaging the product. Would the WWE have more subscriptions, better ratings etc if they had replaced it with 1 great workers putting on a 4* match? My guess is that it generates a lot of moaning online, but in the long run makes little difference. The Saudi Prince gets what he has paid for 

Im not sure HBK and Austin are comparable. Austin bigger star and away for longer. I would renew my subscription for Austin and not for HBK. I'm not sure there is an answer, people just have more entertaininment options these days. I'm not sure wrestling will create the megastars it has in the past 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, pink_triangle said:

Is it really damaging the product. Would the WWE have more subscriptions, better ratings etc if they had replaced it with 1 great workers putting on a 4* match? My guess is that it generates a lot of moaning online, but in the long run makes little difference. The Saudi Prince gets what he has paid for 

Im not sure HBK and Austin are comparable. Austin bigger star and away for longer. I would renew my subscription for Austin and not for HBK. I'm not sure there is an answer, people just have more entertaininment options these days. I'm not sure wrestling will create the megastars it has in the past 


I’ve never said they need to have 4 star matches so I don’t know why you keep bring it up. I’ve said they need to stop putting on painfully shit and embarrassing matches in marquee positions. Seriously go and watch the DX vs Brothers Of Destruction, Goldberg vs ‘taker or the 40min HHH ‘mania matches of the last few years and then tell me that’s the way forward for the company.

WWE hanging onto the past is damaging the product. They haven’t built new stars as they keep going back to the same old shit in the hopes that Shane or Goldberg will still pop. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, jump said:


I’ve never said they need to have 4 star matches so I don’t know why you keep bring it up. I’ve said they need to stop putting on painfully shit and embarrassing matches in marquee positions. Seriously go and watch the DX vs Brothers Of Destruction, Goldberg vs ‘taker or the 40min HHH ‘mania matches of the last few years and then tell me that’s the way forward for the company.

WWE hanging onto the past is damaging the product. They haven’t built new stars as they keep going back to the same old shit in the hopes that Shane or Goldberg will still pop. 

Whatever the match quality if the Saudi prince gets what he wants they will see it as worth doing. I would prefer no Saudi money, but he is getting what he pays for, I think these matches stir a lot of debate online, but don't think they make much difference in the long run. As I said I think the general metrics would be the same whether they took place or not.

Agree about building new stars, but easier said than done. Has a true wrestling star been built since Cena? Maybe the day of the true stars are over, hope I will be proven wrong 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, pink_triangle said:

Whatever the match quality if the Saudi prince gets what he wants they will see it as worth doing. I would prefer no Saudi money, but he is getting what he pays for, I think these matches stir a lot of debate online, but don't think they make much difference in the long run. As I said I think the general metrics would be the same whether they took place or not.

Agree about building new stars, but easier said than done. Has a true wrestling star been built since Cena? Maybe the day of the true stars are over, hope I will be proven wrong 

The talk is for Austin to do at ‘mania not Crown Jewel but I’m glad you agree these old timers make fuck all difference at last.

Now if only I can get you to agree Vince is senile and out of touch! 😜

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, jump said:

The talk is for Austin to do at ‘mania not Crown Jewel but I’m glad you agree these old timers make fuck all difference at last.

Now if only I can get you to agree Vince is senile and out of touch! 😜

Would WWE be doing better if HHH was in charge, I'm not convinced either way. Part of me thinks WWE are going to be at a similar level, whoever is in charge, whoever they sign and however they book.

No doubt someone like Austin would give a short term boost. As I said they would get me back and I suspect others. Whether the short term boost is worth it, is for cleverer people than me to decide.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure there's a promo I can remember being as good as or having the same impact as MJF's one this week. Completely left field but beautifully plotted. Outstanding stuff from a performance and storyline perspective. Him v Punk has been out of this world thus far in terms of building narrative and delivering on it. Genuinely next level shit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, kingbadger said:

Not sure there's a promo I can remember being as good as or having the same impact as MJF's one this week. Completely left field but beautifully plotted. Outstanding stuff from a performance and storyline perspective. Him v Punk has been out of this world thus far in terms of building narrative and delivering on it. Genuinely next level shit. 

Agreed, that promo was incredible and I have no idea where they are going with it which is partly why it was so good. AEW is leagues above WWE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/25/2022 at 6:52 PM, jump said:

Pink's not really into that type of wrestling, he likes sports entertainment. None of that Dusty Rhodes American Dream nonsense, he wants the guy polka dots! 😜 

I love the sports entertainment side when done well, attitude era my favourite time in wrestling. Austin v Brett my favourite match as it has everything, sports entertainment combined with great wrestling, great crowds who make you believe in their rivalry.

However growing up we didn't have sky. It was WCW and the mid card of Rhodes, Windham, Rude, Austin, Steamboat and Steiners that first caught my attention.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/19/2022 at 9:32 PM, kingbadger said:

@pink_triangle if you wanna spend money on wrestling and trying to get back into it then don't waste money on the Network and get yourself an AEW Plus subscription instead.

I have watched AEW and it's fine, but it wouldn't drag me back. There just wasn't anything that really connected with me. Maybe if I watched more, but I have a big list of things on Netflix and not enough time.  To me wrestling is now more nostalgia which is why I probably would go back to the network above anything.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...