Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2025 Headliners


Guest

Recommended Posts

What do people think about Tyler The Creator getting a shot?

 

Visa issues sorted, Flog Gnaw set looked wild last year, and strangely wide appeal.

 

I first saw him (with OF) 13 years ago as a 17 year old. He’s still popular with 17 year olds now.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WillyVWade said:

What do people think about Tyler The Creator getting a shot?

 

Visa issues sorted, Flog Gnaw set looked wild last year, and strangely wide appeal.

 

I first saw him (with OF) 13 years ago as a 17 year old. He’s still popular with 17 year olds now.

 

 

That’d be as bad as SZA lmao. No chance of them gambling on a headliner like that again over the next few years. Fine to sub though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Frankly Mr Shankly said:

They need to get more professional with the booking of pyramid headliners and have genuine back up plans. Every time they’ve gone hard after a white whale that’s failed they’ve been left scrambling around for a headliner…
 

2011: Failed to get Prince, ended up bumping up Beyoncé

2014: Failed to get Prince, ended up with Metallica 

2015: Failed to get Prince, ended up with the Who 

2019: Failed to get Fleetwood Mac, ended up with the Killers 

2023: Failed to get Rihanna, ended up with GnR 

2024: Failed to get Madonna, ended up bumping up SZA 


Obviously some of those worked out great, some were fine but uninspired, some flat out failed. 

Most festivals would make deals with the devil to have the likes of Beyonce, Metallica, GnR, The Who etc as their backup headliners. 😄

 

The last minute bump of Florence when Foos had to cancel was a success.

 

Only the SZA situation stands out from those as a mis step.

Edited by FrogLobster
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, WillyVWade said:

What do people think about Tyler The Creator getting a shot?

 

Visa issues sorted, Flog Gnaw set looked wild last year, and strangely wide appeal.

 

I first saw him (with OF) 13 years ago as a 17 year old. He’s still popular with 17 year olds now.

 

 

Headlining Other I think.

Edited by FrogLobster
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, FrogLobster said:

Most festivals would make deals with the devil to have the likes of Beyonce, Metallica, GnR, The Who etc as their backup headliners. 😄

 

Only the SZA situation stands out from those as an mis step.

They had to get the Who to cancel a show in Paris to play, lack of forward planning. 
 

Beyoncé in 2011 was not the same level as Beyoncé today. She was subbing festivals at that time. Yes it paid off, but it was a risk at the time. 
 

Metallica & GnR are huge acts, but they’re not the ones you think of when you think Glastonbury demographics are they. They were risks that paid off. 
 

None of that negates my point though. I wasn’t saying those examples were terrible headliners, I was saying that Emily in particular goes all in on trying to get one huge act & then scrambles around last minute when that falls through. Hence a more professional booking team would be better (and arguably balance the lineup across the site better as well, which is a separate issue altogether). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't remember where I read it, but I was under the impression that there were meetings between main stage bookers at certain points in the year to discuss where they needed to make swaps and iron out problematic sequencing for things like crushing/movements between, or bearing in mind artist activity, or even planned releases and tours for the following year's bookings too. Hard to predict, and I think sometimes historically they have got it wrong (only occassionally), but problems post covid seem a bit more noticeable. Could be any number of reasons - changes to management of some stage areas maybe? Is it more complex now to gage as you are also second-guessing behaviours from elements like streaming/social media, and not just albums, tours and more traditional exposure? Has the general trajectory of some performers been a bit more unpredictable due to covid disruption? (e.g. delays to tours, changes, releases). Granted we are getting few years in from that, but to me it's felt like it has hung over the last 3 festivals a bit. Lots of people talk about shifting demographics too, but don't think I've seen data on that recently.    

Edited by kh24
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, FrogLobster said:

Most festivals would make deals with the devil to have the likes of Beyonce, Metallica, GnR, The Who etc as their backup headliners. 😄

 

The last minute bump of Florence when Foos had to cancel was a success.

 

Only the SZA situation stands out from those as an mis step.

They got lucky with The Who agreeing to cancel a gig in fairness. God knows what they’d have done if that hadn’t been possible. In general the headliner strategy works fine but with the big acts getting more and more expensive you do wonder if SZA situations will happen more and more frequently. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, FrogLobster said:

Fred Again... / Kasabian

Noel Gallagher

 

Lady Gaga / Paramore

Tyler The Creator

 

Robbie Williams / Raye / Spice Girls (Legend)

The Prodigy


Lovely mix this. Would rather Olivia Rodrigo instead of Lady Gaga and probably more likely too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, foolee said:


Lovely mix this. Would rather Olivia Rodrigo instead of Lady Gaga and probably more likely too. 

I'd love Olivia to do it; but my guess is she is on a break next year to do a new album then will headline when she is on the next tour cycle.

Edited by FrogLobster
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Rose-Colored Boy said:

That’d be as bad as SZA lmao. No chance of them gambling on a headliner like that again over the next few years. Fine to sub though. 

I thought the issue with SZA was that it was just boring?

 

His CFG, Coachella and Lollapalooza sets look like they should be measured in megatonnes.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Frankly Mr Shankly said:

. Ironically last year when the same situation happened with Rihanna, they could and should have bumped Lizzo but chose not to. 

That's what annoys me too. Like Lizzo could easily have been bumped up and it wouldn't have looked too out of place and she obv puts on a good show. They did this weird thing tho when they were like 'aw she's basically a headliner' when she objectively wasn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, FrogLobster said:

Fred Again... / Kasabian

Noel Gallagher

 

Lady Gaga / Paramore

Tyler The Creator

 

Robbie Williams / Raye / Spice Girls (Legend)

The Prodigy

 

 

Tear it apart, folks.

Very IOW - would feel like an over correction after this year. and Fred Again and Noel Gallagher at the same time, popular as they are, would leave a lot of people with nothing to do.

 

Love the Saturday though. 

Edited by Rose-Colored Boy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WillyVWade said:

I thought the issue with SZA was that it was just boring?

 

His CFG, Coachella and Lollapalooza sets look like they should be measured in megatonnes.

 

 

That was the issue when it started. But she failed to draw a crowd in the first place because your average Capital FM or Absolute Radio listener doesn’t know any of her songs. TTC would be the same, sadly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, kh24 said:

I can't remember where I read it, but I was under the impression that there were meetings between main stage bookers at certain points in the year to discuss where they needed to make swaps and iron out problematic sequencing for things like crushing/movements between, or bearing in mind artist activity, or even planned releases and tours for the following year's bookings too. Hard to predict, and I think sometimes historically they have got it wrong (only occassionally), but problems post covid seem a bit more noticeable. Could be any number of reasons - changes to management of some stage areas maybe? Is it more complex now to gage as you are also second-guessing behaviours from elements like streaming/social media, and not just albums, tours and more traditional exposure? Has the general trajectory of some performers been a bit more unpredictable due to covid disruption? (e.g. delays to tours, changes, releases). Granted we are getting few years in from that, but to me it's felt like it has hung over the last 3 festivals a bit. Lots of people talk about shifting demographics too, but don't think I've seen data on that recently.    

Surely there has to be some level of close cooperation and discussion between booking stages to avoid clashes, with a festival that covers a wide range of genres it wouldn't be wise to leave the chance of putting 2 artists with more niche appeals and overlapping fanbases against each other 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Charliehmiller said:

Olivia Rodrigo 

Fred Again

Taylor Swift 

 

Legend 

Robbie Williams

I really don't think it'll be Taylor. The tour is ending this year and she's significantly bigger than the festival at this point. Scaling down her shows for the Pyramid doesn't seem on the cards I don't think. Maybe she pops up with a surprise festival tour next year but it'd be incredibly surprising given how much money she'd leave on the table from just doing her own events and the creative control she'd give up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, jparx said:

I really don't think it'll be Taylor. The tour is ending this year and she's significantly bigger than the festival at this point. Scaling down her shows for the Pyramid doesn't seem on the cards I don't think. Maybe she pops up with a surprise festival tour next year but it'd be incredibly surprising given how much money she'd leave on the table from just doing her own events and the creative control she'd give up.

Agree. The only way would be if Coachella pays her a f**k ton to design a set suitable for them and she’s able to transfer it to the Pyramid with minimal fuss. But it certainly sounds like 2027 will be the next time Taylor and Glastonbury’s windows overlap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Rose-Colored Boy said:

Agree. The only way would be if Coachella pays her a f**k ton to design a set suitable for them and she’s able to transfer it to the Pyramid with minimal fuss. But it certainly sounds like 2027 will be the next time Taylor and Glastonbury’s windows overlap.

If I were Taylor, I'd go back to the Lover Fest idea and do my own festival. She could easily get together a bill with the likes of LDR, HAIM, Phoebe Bridgers, Sabrina Carpenter, Paramore, even The National and Bon Iver could factor. Rent out Hyde Park for two days and a do a weekend job. She's her own event at this stage, why on earth would she go under someone else's banner..?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, foolee said:


Lovely mix this. Would rather Olivia Rodrigo instead of Lady Gaga and probably more likely too. 

 

Olivia Rodrigo isn't likely at all next year. She's on a huge mammoth tour and is very unlikely to be back in Europe two summers running. 

She will 1 million percent headline one day but I reckon 2025 is highly unlikely.

 

Taylor Swift is exactly same. She likely won't be back in Europe next year with her massive crew. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, FrogLobster said:

I think TS said she is going to do try and do movies (Acting/directing) after the Eras tour is over? Thats a lengthy commitment.

Yes although it was also leaked the other day that she’s planning another album and tour for 2026. If that tour went on for 18 months ala Eras then June 2027 could be in play. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Rose-Colored Boy said:

Yes although it was also leaked the other day that she’s planning another album and tour for 2026. If that tour went on for 18 months ala Eras then June 2027 could be in play. 

Well, she is bound to have some kind of material to intentionally kneecap Sabrina Carpenter and Chapell Roan's careers. 😏

Edited by FrogLobster
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...