Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Football 2022/23


charlierc

Recommended Posts

19 hours ago, Punksnotdead said:

I think it probably brushed his upper arm, but it's still ridiculous that there's different rules for attackers and defenders!

No big deal I guess, as it didn't affect the final result, but it could have!

Indeed that was Rashford's take on it...

Not least as West Ham had two goals allowed despite Fulham having very similar complaints about ball-to-hand use in the build-up.

I knew we were going to need a transition to having VAR used but fuck me how long do they need to tighten this up? And do we need extensive rule re-writes every year to try and get closer to making it work?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, charlierc said:

I see VAR was up to VAR things again yesterday in the Champions League. How many more rule tweaks does it need to maybe work?

Its never going to work.

Ruined poor Harvey Elliots first CL goal for Liverpool last night. Perfectly good goal. Left standing there looking at the screen like a twat after his celebration waiting to see if it would be given.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, The Nal said:

Its never going to work.

Ruined poor Harvey Elliots first CL goal for Liverpool last night. Perfectly good goal. Left standing there looking at the screen like a twat after his celebration waiting to see if it would be given.

You could argue it gave him the goal, it was ruled out until VAR reviewed it but obviously the counter argument is the officials are more likely to rule something out because they know they have VAR to back them up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Gnomicide said:

You could argue it gave him the goal, it was ruled out until VAR reviewed it but obviously the counter argument is the officials are more likely to rule something out because they know they have VAR to back them up.

Problem is that VAR isn't foolproof, VAR officials very often get things wrong, badly wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Neil said:

sallah's 6 minute hatrick was unexpected.

glad rangers got spanked, as it stops the inevitable comments saying they'd do alright in the prem.

Eventually they probably would, they have the crowd and the stadium but don't have the funds. A few years down the line they'd do well. The problem is that by that time they'd be in the Championship at best and would be as far off Premier League money as they are now. It would take many years for them to be pushing top 4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Gnomicide said:

You could argue it gave him the goal, it was ruled out until VAR reviewed it but obviously the counter argument is the officials are more likely to rule something out because they know they have VAR to back them up.

Indeed. Either way we'll see the same shit 4 or 5 times this weekend. Perfectly good goal, kinda celebrate, hang on VAR check, actually yeah it's a goal, kick off immediately. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

The Premier League has been asked to confirm whether it has investigated the billionaire owner of Manchester City Football Club under its “fit and proper” owners’ test, over allegations of helping Russian oligarchs avoid western sanctions after the invasion of Ukraine.

the despot is possibly in trouble.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/3/2022 at 4:27 PM, Neil said:

My boys? you do love your fantasies: like city aren't cheats or owned by a despot?

How have they cheated?

Been through this before. You just spout unsubstantiated bullshit.

Hopefully we give your boys a good hiding on Sunday.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, eastynh said:

How have they cheated?

they've fiddled the FFP rules.

 

1 minute ago, eastynh said:

Been through this before. You just spout unsubstantiated bullshit.

Hopefully we give your boys a good hiding on Sunday.

 city are playing aldershot?

city is owned by a despot, who is helping his despot mate putin by the look of things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Neil said:

they've fiddled the FFP rules.

 

 city are playing aldershot?

city is owned by a despot, who is helping his despot mate putin by the look of things.

I don't agree with you regarding ffp. You know my views on that. There is no evidence of cheating. We are the most scrutinised club in the whole of football and there is no evidence of any misdemeanours. Or are you going back over 10 years, for the things we were punished for?

 

If UAE is supporting Russia, I will boycott City and the owners should be sanctioned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, eastynh said:

If UAE is supporting Russia, I will boycott City and the owners should be sanctioned.

seems like it is, its providing a lot of the services that London used to provide?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Neil said:

they've fiddled the FFP rules.

 

 city are playing aldershot?

city is owned by a despot, who is helping his despot mate putin by the look of things.

As a Shots fan, I can say we also have a decidedly dodgy chairman. It runs deep in the football pyramid…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ryan1984 said:

As a Shots fan, I can say we also have a decidedly dodgy chairman. It runs deep in the football pyramid…

i missed that aldersht's owners own a whole country.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, pink_triangle said:

I really hope I am wrong (as I like Aldershot) but can't see you staying up this season. Struggling to think of 4 teams I can see finishing below you.

I think we are going down. We’re very poor. Rumour is our chairman wants to drive the club into the ground and sell the land of our stadium for housing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Ryan1984 said:

I think we are going down. We’re very poor. Rumour is our chairman wants to drive the club into the ground and sell the land of our stadium for housing.

there's a covenant on aldershot's ground which means it can't be sold off. the council put that in place when they sold the club the ground: the ground is still officially a public park, can walk a dog on it up to ten minutes before kick-off (someone tested that part).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Neil said:

there's a covenant on aldershot's ground which means it can't be sold off. the council put that in place when they sold the club the ground: the ground is still officially a public park, can walk a dog on it up to ten minutes before kick-off (someone tested that part).

Covenants mean the square route of fuck all. There was a covenant on the land where FC United built their ground.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, eastynh said:

Covenants mean the square route of fuck all. There was a covenant on the land where FC United built their ground.

Council wouldn't give planning permission for development if breaking a coventent the council put in place. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
    • We had a really good weekend this year. This was our 2nd year after giving it a go last year with 3 year old twins (we do Glasto but don't take the kids and have no plans to in the distant future!!).   Highlights of the weekend for me was Peter Hook & the Light, English Teacher, Flaming Lips, Adult DVD and Alex James (I get the karaoke thing but I still thought it was great). Missed loads of acts we wanted to see due to having two kids in tow but overall we left happy with what we managed to see across the weekend. Some great food vendors, good to see Steak Frites make an appearance this year, one of my faves from Glasto. Festival is really well run, toilets remained clean and stocked with loo roll all weekend, even on Sunday night/Monday morning. The walk from the cars is a ballache but it is what it is, arriving Thursday evening meant we were parked as far away as you could be.   My only gripe is that there seems to be a trend of parents letting their teenagers camp completely separately to them in family camping. We had a large group of 15-17 year olds near us who came home pissed up every evening at 3-4am being really loud and annoying! I get that it's a festival etc but I think it's taking the piss a bit letting your kids camp separately and disrupt everyone else.   All in all we had a really good time and are looking forward to next year.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...