Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

So, there is this exit wave they keep talking about, and we must have it now because summer is best time etc...but they're obviously shitting it with how high this wave is going to be, what with not everyone fully vaccinated, social disatncing restrictions ending, and now loads of people turning off their test/trace apps. So, this is why we are seeing a bit of a push back with govt and scientists urging caution, slow and steady, go out but don't go out, go to work but don't go to work, wear a mask because you're good etc etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, steviewevie said:

no, but debatable when is best time to have that exit wave...Whitty says there is disagreement about that.

I thought SAGE were on the same page that the summer is better than later in the year? all the Fake SAGE lot are very coy about when an exit wave is best. They seem to be saying that its possible to avoid an exit wave altogether, which is.... unlikely

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Barry Fish said:

Its a minor thing if you don't work in the industry or the supply chain.  I get they have a view point but to call it a minor thing is fucking awful when you think of the potential job loses and financial many would face.  At least own the call and say - although we know this would wreck some lives we think it might save others - I could respect that viewpoint as it was honest.

nah, according to them its a minor disruption which will apparently benefit people overall! ;-/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do we think the UK has an issue /  borderline obsession with testing at this stage?
Obviously not talking about those who are symptomatic who genuinely think they may have the virus, but more just the sheer numbers we are doing across all settings. Not sure if it’s true (and I have no reason to believe it isn’t) but I read that we carried out more tests yesterday than the whole of Europe combined. This is clearly going to make our numbers look so much worse in comparison, and maybe our rates per 100k aren’t actually much higher, or as much of an issue as they appear. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, zahidf said:

nah, according to them its a minor disruption which will apparently benefit people overall! ;-/

 

Just now, Barry Fish said:

I think we should be having grown up discussions on cause and effect.  There might be an argument to us being better overall.  But when they say something is a minor disruption (which it clearly would not be) you have to question there ability to be in this debate don't you...  Bunch of morons.

I think its fair to say a lot of medical people would happily see the back of alcohol and pubs, so you do have to wonder whether that "benefit" is in the back of their minds when making these suggestions 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, zahidf said:

I thought SAGE were on the same page that the summer is better than later in the year? all the Fake SAGE lot are very coy about when an exit wave is best. They seem to be saying that its possible to avoid an exit wave altogether, which is.... unlikely

 

He said there was some disagreement about that...there is no good time basically, and there is a lot of uncertainty...and probably because of political and economic pressures they've decided to go for it now. Indie Sage, as I like to call them because it sounds cool, have always been cautious, maybe over cautious...and are pushing for things to open slowly once as many as poss vaccinated...and have also been pushing for better ventilation in schools/workplaces etc., which is reasonable...especially when we're going to have a shit load of other viruses splattering about this winter. But yeah, obviously certain industries like hospitality are going to be fucked without people back in them, or massive government support.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, st dan said:

Do we think the UK has an issue /  borderline obsession with testing at this stage?
Obviously not talking about those who are symptomatic who genuinely think they may have the virus, but more just the sheer numbers we are doing across all settings. Not sure if it’s true (and I have no reason to believe it isn’t) but I read that we carried out more tests yesterday than the whole of Europe combined. This is clearly going to make our numbers look so much worse in comparison, and maybe our rates per 100k aren’t actually much higher, or as much of an issue as they appear. 

you test because you need to act early if cases start to get really high. As WHO said, Test, Test, Test. But once we're through this last wave (hopefully last wave), and the vaccinations are done...then yeah, I guess no need to do so much of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, steviewevie said:

you test because you need to act early if cases start to get really high. As WHO said, Test, Test, Test. But once we're through this last wave (hopefully last wave), and the vaccinations are done...then yeah, I guess no need to do so much of it.

If we had not been testing so much recently, would people be so worried now? The cases would be less. And our hospital admissions and deaths would still be the same (low). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Havors said:

If we had not been testing so much recently, would people be so worried now? The cases would be less. And our hospital admissions and deaths would still be the same (low). 

well, makes it easy to show the link between cases and hospitalisation/deaths is weakened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, zahidf said:

I thought SAGE were on the same page that the summer is better than later in the year? all the Fake SAGE lot are very coy about when an exit wave is best. They seem to be saying that its possible to avoid an exit wave altogether, which is.... unlikely

 

Fake SAGE constantly change what they’re most annoyed about or what the one big reason we shouldn’t end restrictions. 
 

Long covid. Schools. The vulnerable. Variants. Herd immunity. Blah blah blah

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BobWillis2 said:

Fake SAGE constantly change what they’re most annoyed about or what the one big reason we shouldn’t end restrictions. 
 

Long covid. Schools. The vulnerable. Variants. Herd immunity. Blah blah blah

Today it’s duration of stay in hospital. 
 


 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

you test because you need to act early if cases start to get really high. As WHO said, Test, Test, Test. But once we're through this last wave (hopefully last wave), and the vaccinations are done...then yeah, I guess no need to do so much of it.

Plus consistency in testing allows you to see the impact changes have… though I guess arguably you could say policy changes might make people more or less likely to task a test!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Nobody Interesting said:

With this level of concern, the economy will suffer and yet again the reasons why unlocking is wanted by the Tories fails them.

Will they ever learn? I doubt it.

Chart title: A majority of people are worried about the lifting of rules in England

 

Go the pubs after July 19th and see for yourself how worried people are. Going by the way the bars have been since May 17th people mostly don't give a fuck. The economy will jump again post 19th. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

2 hours ago, Justiceforcedave said:

This is the policy we have at my escape room business. We allow people to take them off once they begin their game and the hosts have left the room.

If someone doesn’t want to wear one… then they don’t get to come in.

“We are delighted that the UK's Covid vaccination drive has been so effective. However, at this stage not all of our staff have received full protection.

To ensure both their safety and the safety of visitors in this time of transition, we request that all guests continue to wear a mask or face covering whilst in the presence of our hosts.

Adhering to this rule will be a condition of entry and if you do not arrive with a mask, one will be provided for you. If you have any questions about this or your booking please get in touch”

Whereabouts if you don't mind me asking? I managed a grand total of 3 escape rooms last year which is a bit down on my annual average of 100... they were doing a bang-up job on disinfecting everything between games. Apparently alcohol gel destroys locks over time!

2 hours ago, Barry Fish said:

So we are not respecting personal choice as the PM said we would a few weeks ago.  So what's the point in the future we do I suppose is the next question?  

It's cute you thought the Tories meant personal choices of individuals and not businesses!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Havors said:

Go the pubs after July 19th and see for yourself how worried people are. Going by the way the bars have been since May 17th people mostly don't give a fuck. The economy will jump again post 19th. 

you know, not everyone is in the pub?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Nobody Interesting said:

With this level of concern, the economy will suffer and yet again the reasons why unlocking is wanted by the Tories fails them.

Will they ever learn? I doubt it.

Chart title: A majority of people are worried about the lifting of rules in England

 

I mean, I probably would have said ‘somewhat worried’ in answer to that question, because there remains a chance it could all go tits up. But that doesn’t mean I don’t think it should happen, or that I won’t be taking advantage of the ability to go to clubs and festivals myself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Nobody Interesting said:

I have zero desire to go to any pub, I have seen the idiots in the recently as I walk by - but the numbers in them are small and many regulars I know round here are not going back.

They may look busy but it will not last long and they will not be like they were before.

Also, pubs are not the entire economy, just one small part but of course the economy will jump as they compare month by month. So come October is when we will get the first real idea as they compare September to August.

Well thank fuck I dont live where you live. Sounds boring as fuck 🙂 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, sjseabass said:

I mean, I probably would have said ‘somewhat worried’ in answer to that question, because there remains a chance it could all go tits up. But that doesn’t mean I don’t think it should happen, or that I won’t be taking advantage of the ability to go to clubs and festivals myself.

Yep agreed, again it’s a poll with a leading question. Worried about what exactly? Your health? Your families health? Your job? Could be anything. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...