Nirvana - Would they have headlined?

[CaledonianGonzo]

I heard this lad's going to sue Mick and Keith.

[gigpusher]

4 hours ago, Hugh Jass said:

It's the fact that he's suddenly coming out with this child exploitation/pornography/sex worker bullshit now after years of living a life celebrating the fact that he was the Nirvana baby. Had this always been his stance then I could understand a little more, but he's been reaping the benefits for years and now the money seems to have dried up he's taking another tact.

Shameless cash in attempt.

Yes I'd like to think this will get laughed out of court. He's tried to cash in on it at every opportunity. His parents allowed it to happen and took the money for it. If he wants to have a go at anyone it should be them. At the time there was no way to know that it would be such an iconic piece of art but if he didn't like it he could never mention it and it's not like anyone would have any idea it was him. 

[Hugh Jass]

On 8/26/2021 at 11:37 AM, Hugh Jass said:

It's the fact that he's suddenly coming out with this child exploitation/pornography/sex worker bullshit now after years of living a life celebrating the fact that he was the Nirvana baby. Had this always been his stance then I could understand a little more, but he's been reaping the benefits for years and now the money seems to have dried up he's taking another tact.

Shameless cash in attempt.

To the surprise of nobody his lawsuit has been thrown out...

https://www.theguardian.com/music/2022/jan/04/nirvana-nevermind-baby-cover-artwork-lawsuit-dismissed

[Hugh Jass]

Not a penny in royalties...

[Supernintendo Chalmers]

20 minutes ago, Hugh Jass said:

Not a penny in royalties...

 

[henry bear]

Fuck all apologies 

[she bangs the drums]

https://thehardtimes.net/culture/weird-transparent-angel-lady-from-in-utero-cover-also-announces-lawsuit/