Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

West Holts 2017


Gucci Piggy

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

1 hour ago, eastynh said:

It will not be the same without possibly the greatest pop star that has ever walked the earth.

Yet given the choice of a load of stone cold party classics or the monotonous, shouty, guitar dirge produced by the Foo Fighters, there is only one option.

There are a lot of downbeat bands on this year. The Jacksons stand out like a little ray on sunshine anongst the gloom.

I couldn't agree more. @thewayiam is completely right to suggest that The Jacksons are far far poorer an act without Michael Jackson. But that still doesn't change the fact that Jermaine and his brothers are still massively talented and charismatic performers, and more importantly have a staggeringly great back catalogue. With Michael they would headline the whole festival. Without they're merely as good as Earth Wind and Fire.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, FloorFiller said:

The xx not coming off too well there - not boding well for my prediction of them nailing the main stage sub slot, although I'm sure they'll go down a lot better over here/at Glastonbury than Coachella.

I thought they sounded great, what do the Guardian know pffftt ^_^

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, eastynh said:

It will not be the same without possibly the greatest pop star that has ever walked the earth.

Yet given the choice of a load of stone cold party classics or the monotonous, shouty, guitar dirge produced by the Foo Fighters, there is only one option.

There are a lot of downbeat bands on this year. The Jacksons stand out like a little ray on sunshine anongst the gloom.

You're right about MJ but as for the rest, what lineup are you looking at bar Friday night I admit?, as long as you are away from the Pyramid you avoid the bore fest.

30 minutes ago, stuartbert two hats said:

I couldn't agree more. @thewayiam is completely right to suggest that The Jacksons are far far poorer an act without Michael Jackson. But that still doesn't change the fact that Jermaine and his brothers are still massively talented and charismatic performers, and more importantly have a staggeringly great back catalogue. With Michael they would headline the whole festival. Without they're merely as good as Earth Wind and Fire.

 

Thanks but in fairness if Jermaine was all that and remembered then he wouldn't need a stint on Big Brother which then didn't help at all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, thewayiam said:

You're right about MJ but as for the rest, what lineup are you looking at bar Friday night I admit?, as long as you are away from the Pyramid you avoid the bore fest.

Thanks but in fairness if Jermaine was all that and remembered then he wouldn't need a stint on Big Brother which then didn't help at all. 

This is a good point!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you became prejudiced against people on the basis of appearing on Big Brother, imagine how much poorer your life would be without all those classic works by Goldie Lookin Chain, or Preston & The Bottlemen, or Punk Donny, or whatever 90s pop band the racist one was in. The list goes on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GETOFFAMYLAWN said:

If you became prejudiced against people on the basis of appearing on Big Brother, imagine how much poorer your life would be without all those classic works by Goldie Lookin Chain, or Preston & The Bottlemen, or Punk Donny, or whatever 90s pop band the racist one was in. The list goes on.

And Pete Burns from DOA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Wanderlei said:

And Pete Burns from DOA.

His tune was a banger though, would've ruined the effect of the sarcasm I was doing. Same reason I omitted George Galloway; foremost exponent of feline impersonations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Wanderlei said:

Dappy?

Well given that he's Phil Jupitus' rhythm section, I'd assume he's a regular fixture of the Astrolabe's bill 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, thewayiam said:

You're right about MJ but as for the rest, what lineup are you looking at bar Friday night I admit?, as long as you are away from the Pyramid you avoid the bore fest.

Thanks but in fairness if Jermaine was all that and remembered then he wouldn't need a stint on Big Brother which then didn't help at all. 

The Saturday does not really appeal to me either apart from the West Holts potential line up.

From reading on here it is looking like Saha on at the Glade. If it was Sasha doing a Shelleys set then I would watch that above anything else (including NO and DM). His stuff with Digweed does not really interest me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, GETOFFAMYLAWN said:

If you became prejudiced against people on the basis of appearing on Big Brother, imagine how much poorer your life would be without all those classic works by Goldie Lookin Chain, or Preston & The Bottlemen, or Punk Donny, or whatever 90s pop band the racist one was in. The list goes on.

It's not that at all lol, it's purely the fact that he went on there and made it out practically before he'd got there. If he was good enough to front The Jacksons like MJ then his career wouldn't have been over since MJ left to go solo.

49 minutes ago, Wanderlei said:

And Pete Burns from DOA.

This is my point completely to be fair.

48 minutes ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

It's a moot point. The Bee Gees are playing and they've only got one original member left.

At least he's the original lead though and he's doing a set with Bee Gees songs in just like Weller has with The Jam and so on....this holds no weight ;p

32 minutes ago, eastynh said:

The Saturday does not really appeal to me either apart from the West Holts potential line up.

From reading on here it is looking like Saha on at the Glade. If it was Sasha doing a Shelleys set then I would watch that above anything else (including NO and DM). His stuff with Digweed does not really interest me.

At least it isn't just Sash! as then I'd have to choose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Jacksons are winning the race for my attention on the Saturday def, with or without Michael, they'll be fun and everyone will know 90% of the music, so you know it'll be a great time. Going off some of the videos on youtube it looks like just a good bloody laugh, esp against the marathon/slog that'll be the Foos

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, thewayiam said:

It's not that at all lol, it's purely the fact that he went on there and made it out practically before he'd got there. If he was good enough to front The Jacksons like MJ then his career wouldn't have been over since MJ left to go solo.

There's an argument that if Michael had never left for bigger things and was still fronting them today, they'd still be in this position as a heritage motown act at the top of the Holts. How successful they've been since Michael left isn't really a measure of how good they'll be, and nobody's under any illusions that they'll come on stage looking and sounding like it's still the 70s. Art Garfunkel last year was a highlight, despite having all the issues you have about Jermaine and the lads, but to a bigger degree. Thanks for your concern Gazza, but we're under no illusions as to what The Jacksons in 2017 entails.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, GETOFFAMYLAWN said:

There's an argument that if Michael had never left for bigger things and was still fronting them today, they'd still be in this position as a heritage motown act at the top of the Holts. How successful they've been since Michael left isn't really a measure of how good they'll be, and nobody's under any illusions that they'll come on stage looking and sounding like it's still the 70s. Art Garfunkel last year was a highlight, despite having all the issues you have about Jermaine and the lads, but to a bigger degree. Thanks for your concern Gazza, but we're under no illusions as to what The Jacksons in 2017 entails.

For a start The Jacksons are lucky to be topping West Holts and there isn't a chance at all that with MJ they would be on that stage, don't be bloody stupid!

I don't see what the Art argument is?, he was a main man, it was called Simon and Garfunkel, not just Simon.

Issues with Jermaine?, I don't have any, I just questioned their credibility without MJ and that comparing videos was clear and someone said they were shit at Bestival.....not me. You are pulling things out that aren't there here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, thewayiam said:

I don't see what the Art argument is?, he was a main man, it was called Simon and Garfunkel, not just Simon. 

:D Yeah soz mate, not comparable at all to Michael & The Jacksons really is it?

I've started picturing Donald Trump typing out all of Gazza's posts. It's eerily fitting.

Edited by GETOFFAMYLAWN
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GETOFFAMYLAWN said:

:D Yeah soz mate, not comparable at all to Michael & The Jacksons really is it?

I've started picturing Donald Trump typing out all of Gazza's posts. It's eerily fitting.

No, it really isn't! Michael solo doing his own stuff and covering The Jacksons is, but not a leader singer of a group and basically a tribute act for The Jacksons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
    • We had a really good weekend this year. This was our 2nd year after giving it a go last year with 3 year old twins (we do Glasto but don't take the kids and have no plans to in the distant future!!).   Highlights of the weekend for me was Peter Hook & the Light, English Teacher, Flaming Lips, Adult DVD and Alex James (I get the karaoke thing but I still thought it was great). Missed loads of acts we wanted to see due to having two kids in tow but overall we left happy with what we managed to see across the weekend. Some great food vendors, good to see Steak Frites make an appearance this year, one of my faves from Glasto. Festival is really well run, toilets remained clean and stocked with loo roll all weekend, even on Sunday night/Monday morning. The walk from the cars is a ballache but it is what it is, arriving Thursday evening meant we were parked as far away as you could be.   My only gripe is that there seems to be a trend of parents letting their teenagers camp completely separately to them in family camping. We had a large group of 15-17 year olds near us who came home pissed up every evening at 3-4am being really loud and annoying! I get that it's a festival etc but I think it's taking the piss a bit letting your kids camp separately and disrupt everyone else.   All in all we had a really good time and are looking forward to next year.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...