Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Headliners 2016


thewayiam

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 15.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Biffy

Coldplay

Sheeran

I hope I'm wrong because that looks feckin awful. Actually... Hope I'm right as I'm not planning to go next year.

I think you will be. Sheeran isn't likely at all. He'll not have a new album out by next year and headlining Glasto after playing all of Glasto, T and V the year before doing 3 nights at Wembley will lead to a break. Personally, you can probably discount: Ed Sheeran, Blur, Noel Gallagher, Muse and Prince. I also think Foals and Rihanna will be out the running. Foals purely as if any fest bumps them next year it'll be Reading 1st, even more chance if the new pay structure continues. I even tempted to say Radiohead, while I won't discount them, I do think they are less likely for some reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd say Rihanna isn't out of the running at all, she's not doing any UK fests this year and the album seems to be taking longer than expected to be released.

If Glasto get her next year it will probably be the first festival to get her (in the UK) on her new album cycle. Plus judging by her past festival appearances she seems to play them after the album has dropped.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you will be. Sheeran isn't likely at all. He'll not have a new album out by next year and headlining Glasto after playing all of Glasto, T and V the year before doing 3 nights at Wembley will lead to a break. Personally, you can probably discount: Ed Sheeran, Blur, Noel Gallagher, Muse and Prince. I also think Foals and Rihanna will be out the running. Foals purely as if any fest bumps them next year it'll be Reading 1st, even more chance if the new pay structure continues. I even tempted to say Radiohead, while I won't discount them, I do think they are less likely for some reason.

I'm not sure we'll ever see Radiohead again. Wasn't there a rumour that they pulled out due to "green concerns" a couple of years ago? I wonder if they're not bothered anymore sadly. Edited by Hugh Jass
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure we'll ever see Radiohead again. Wasn't there a rumour that they pulled out due to "green concerns" a couple of years ago? I wonder if they're not bothered anymore sadly.

they played in both 2010 and 2011 so unless something's happened between then and now, i don't see why reason why they wouldn't play again. if they have a new album ready by 2016 (which the should have) then they surely have to be a likely contender. if they're not booked next year, then i think we can safely say it's not gonna happen again

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure we'll ever see Radiohead again. Wasn't there a rumour that they pulled out due to "green concerns" a couple of years ago? I wonder if they're not bothered anymore sadly.

I just wonder if they look at their 1997 was it?, and 2003 and think they did it and they were a moment?, a bit like I guess people see Blur. Not that Thom doesn't love Glasto but he's DJ'd and appeared there in recent years but nothing from the band except for that secret set which was 2 out of 3 of them I think. If we think about the gap between playing, then there was a 5 year gap between headline sets like there is with a few that play so that'd make 2009 at the earliest and they opted whichever pay for Reading instead. They did play a pre-KOL gig at Glasto in 2011 but for the main album tour they had potentially 2013 to play and just did some arena's. They don't interest me mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

they played in both 2010 and 2011 so unless something's happened between then and now, i don't see why reason why they wouldn't play again. if they have a new album ready by 2016 (which the should have) then they surely have to be a likely contender. if they're not booked next year, then i think we can safely say it's not gonna happen again

It's only been secret sets though and not the full band. Are you sure about 2010?, they did in 2011. If something happened in 2010 then it wasn't enough to go down as a Radiohead show, judging by setlist.fm anyway. As I've said, what has changed is Thom mentioning about the sound and if his greener ideas are an issue that might come into it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's only been secret sets though and not the full band. Are you sure about 2010?, they did in 2011. If something happened in 2010 then it wasn't enough to go down as a Radiohead show, judging by setlist.fm anyway. As I've said, what has changed is Thom mentioning about the sound and if his greener ideas are an issue that might come into it.

it was Thom and Jonny so yeah, not all of Radiohead, but it was still some of the core members of the band. maybe they do have issues with the sound, but it'd be an odd reason to just not play the festival again, especially since they seem to be huge friends and fans of the festival, having appeared in some guise almost every year

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The xx to release a dancier, massively successful third album and shoot to the top of the Pyramid. Done.

New direction is produced by Calvin Harris =p

of what prominence do you speak? i don't think they'd warrant much more than a high-ish Other spot or possibly even JP headline these days. there was a bit of hype over the initial reunion, but this second time round a lot less people seem to care

They are an odd one actually, towards the end of the last reunion they headlined latitude and had an Earls Court show which was their biggest to date! So depending on how any new material goes down, could maybe headline Other still. More likely for JP I guess, which would be amazing.

it isn;t gonna be Oasis - Oasis aren't reforming

Yup, and when they do, it will be for mega money which people don't seem to get.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

New direction is produced by Calvin Harris =p

They are an odd one actually, towards the end of the last reunion they headlined latitude and had an Earls Court show which was their biggest to date! So depending on how any new material goes down, could maybe headline Other still. More likely for JP I guess, which would be amazing.

Yup, and when they do, it will be for mega money which people don't seem to get.

oh I get this and totally agree, it's the reason I didn't believe they were playing this year tbh.... but this is just a random guess thread maybe a 1000 pages in we might have a better idea lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...