Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Blur?


wozwebs

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I am tempted to turn up at Hyde Park with a few cans and just sit outside, if I can get in on a cheap ticket great, if not I'll just sit outside and listen.

Good plan. Unless it shits down I'm likely to follow suit! Get me nicely in the mood for the following weeks festivities too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am tempted to turn up at Hyde Park with a few cans and just sit outside, if I can get in on a cheap ticket great, if not I'll just sit outside and listen.

You can't hear everything inside the venue, never mind outside it, haha.

Some company will probably start chucking free tickets at everyone soon. Keep your eyes peeled for competitions too. I swear the Libertines Sunday show at the Ally Pally was almost all competition winners.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good plan. Unless it shits down I'm likely to follow suit! Get me nicely in the mood for the following weeks festivities too.

Shits down? Interesting. I've never heard that one before!

Piss down is obviously well known .. Is there any difference between the two?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Broccoli,

Blackpool is alright for a day out. Loads of things to do with loads of pubs and bars. It is a bit of a stag night and hen night destination, a bit cheesy with kiss me quick hats and stuff so a typical British holiday town in that sense. The Pleasure beach has some great rides and the Big one rollercoaster.

We have Blackpool tickets and I'm looking forward to making a day of it!!

Edited by adjwholovesmusic
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can't hear everything inside the venue, never mind outside it, haha.

Some company will probably start chucking free tickets at everyone soon. Keep your eyes peeled for competitions too. I swear the Libertines Sunday show at the Ally Pally was almost all competition winners.

This is true but Hyde Park is not far for me at all. If all I do is have a few beers in the park and go home it's not big deal as I'd likely do that anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can't hear everything inside the venue, never mind outside it, haha.

Some company will probably start chucking free tickets at everyone soon. Keep your eyes peeled for competitions too. I swear the Libertines Sunday show at the Ally Pally was almost all competition winners.

This is also what I'm thinking. Wouldn't be shocked if there was another "leak" of cheap tickets. Don't know how many tickets they've sold, but given all the desperate measures they were trying months in advance to shift them, I can't imagine too many. Maybe half the allocation? They'll want to avoid the embarrasment of having Blur's triumphant comeback show being played out to a half-empty Hyde Park.

Hope so anyway as I'm desperate to go but there's not way I can afford it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is also what I'm thinking. Wouldn't be shocked if there was another "leak" of cheap tickets. Don't know how many tickets they've sold, but given all the desperate measures they were trying months in advance to shift them, I can't imagine too many. Maybe half the allocation? They'll want to avoid the embarrasment of having Blur's triumphant comeback show being played out to a half-empty Hyde Park.

Hope so anyway as I'm desperate to go but there's not way I can afford it.

I'm hoping for this too. It's not just that I can't afford it to be honest; I resent paying those prices for that venue and the rest of the line up doesn't justify it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I've seen live and from TV footage, I'd probably put my top 3 from the 21st century as:

1. Muse 2004

2. Blur 2009

3. Radiohead 2003

I'm all for opinions etc but any of those 3 being above The Stones, Stevie Wonder, Bowie or Neil Young is an utterly ludicrous suggestion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm all for opinions etc but any of those 3 being above The Stones, Stevie Wonder, Bowie or Neil Young is an utterly ludicrous suggestion.

I may be about to be burnt as a witch... I really enjoyed the Stones 2 years ago, but I enjoyed Arctic Monkeys more the night before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have only been going since 2009 and my top 3 Pyramid headliners have been in no particular order Stones, Stevie and Muse. I thought Muse absolutely killed it. I have seen them time and time again and that night was by far the best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm all for opinions etc but any of those 3 being above The Stones, Stevie Wonder, Bowie or Neil Young is an utterly ludicrous suggestion.

Stevie Wonder was rubbish. And I LOVE Stevie.

Nick Cave 2013 was probably the best thing I have ever seen anywhere.

(edit - wasn't a headliner. still true though)

Edited by pecks
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm all for opinions etc but any of those 3 being above The Stones, Stevie Wonder, Bowie or Neil Young is an utterly ludicrous suggestion.

The Stones were fantastic but I say that because I was there maaaaaaan.

Stevie Wonder didn't impress me on the footage, I know a lot enjoyed it and it was probably great if you were there, but it didn't do much for me.

Neil Young's set was good, but not stunning (sorry hardcore Shakey fans).

Bowie's was probably the best of the 4. I almost put that in the top 3 but then I remembered Radiohead's 2003 set.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats a unique take on the gig!

Why did you think he was crap?

Ok maybe a bit harsh. I struggle with some of the "heritage" shows to be honest. It just felt a bit like another slick going-through-the-motions show. Now if I'd seen him in the 70's, I'm sure that would have been completely different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Stones were great, but if I'm being honest it was more about the event rather than the quality.

I think you're doing them a bit of a disservice there, I thought the TV coverage was no where near representative of the quality of the band etc. It was an event, but that's not to say it wasn't a fantastic performance too. It's hardly as if they were crap a la IOW 2007 and everyone wore rose tinted glasses. I was pleasantly surprised.

As for my top 3 since 2010, I'd probably go:

Stones (13), Stevie Wonder (10), Arcade Fire (14)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you were just going by tv footage I'm not sure how anyone could put the Stones in their top three. It sounded horrid.

I watched Fuck Buttons instead of the stones, and thoroughly enjoyed myself, I then watched the footage of the stones when I got home, and it's easy to see why I didn't regret it one bit

At the time I felt like I was missing quite a big occasion, I think The Who will be similar this year, but I won't be there either

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...