Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Someone I know needs to know something!


Guest Yoghurt on a Stick

Recommended Posts

Thanks t8man but her indoors has said that I've expressed her question wrongly. She is saying that why do supermarket chains sell thick sliced white and thin sliced white but the thick is more expensive than the thin? She insists on shouting in my ear that she doesn't buy either of them. Lord have mercy on us all!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bread companies are notorious c**ts. Worse than oil companies, banks and Jimmy fucking Saville that lot.

T8yman - Are you a "breadsman"?

Reason I ask, been dreaming about winning the lotto recently (I really must start doing it) and have been thinking about the types of people I could employ. My own personal balloonist for example. For all my ballooning needs.

Ian.

Ian the balloonist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

two reasons immediately spring to mind.

1. The more slices it has, the more effort it takes to cut those slices, hence the more it costs. Not slicing bread at all should be cheaper than if you wanted your bread sliced into tiny tiny little wafer thin slices. Draw a graph and a straight line between the two. There's your answer.

2. People who eat thin sliced bread are, in my experience, tossers and deserve to pay more

In fact, can you give me a good reason why the should cost the same? Are you telling me I should subsidise the fucking thin slice brigade?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

two reasons immediately spring to mind.

1. The more slices it has, the more effort it takes to cut those slices, hence the more it costs. Not slicing bread at all should be cheaper than if you wanted your bread sliced into tiny tiny little wafer thin slices. Draw a graph and a straight line between the two. There's your answer.

2. People who eat thin sliced bread are, in my experience, tossers and deserve to pay more

In fact, can you give me a good reason why the should cost the same? Are you telling me I should subsidise the fucking thin slice brigade?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

two reasons immediately spring to mind.

1. The more slices it has, the more effort it takes to cut those slices, hence the more it costs. Not slicing bread at all should be cheaper than if you wanted your bread sliced into tiny tiny little wafer thin slices. Draw a graph and a straight line between the two. There's your answer.

2. People who eat thin sliced bread are, in my experience, tossers and deserve to pay more

In fact, can you give me a good reason why the should cost the same? Are you telling me I should subsidise the fucking thin slice brigade?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surely with a thick sliced loaf, you get more bread in each slice, so each slice should cost more, but you get fewer slices, so it should work out the same? Fuck, my brain hurts!

Wait! I think I know. With a thick sliced loaf, a knife is going through it fewer times than a thin sliced loaf, so you're losing less bread through 'crumbage', therefore you're left with more bread in the finished loaf, so it should cost more!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wait! I think I know. With a thick sliced loaf, a knife is going through it fewer times than a thin sliced loaf, so you're losing less bread through 'crumbage', therefore you're left with more bread in the finished loaf, so it should cost more!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Boring answer maybe but we bake our own. We've got a very old bread making machine (a real machine - not Mrs GH) but cheaper than buying and you know what goes in it. Slices start thin but as you are getting to the end of the loaf it's not so easy and the slices get a bit erratic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

name='Yoghurt on a Stick' timestamp='1350934919' post='3854221']

My other half has just had a smoke and has asked me a question I don't know the answer to. Do you? The question was - why is thick white sliced bread more expensive than thin sliced white? Be as derogatory and off post as you like with your answers. Please.

Edited by Zeppel Inn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

An 800gm loaf goes through a cutting grid. the grid is spaced for thick or medium or thin - end of. the only reasonable argument would be that the thin cutter has more blades and they need replacing at a greater rate than the thick cutter.

when I buy my bread, it is based on the slice count per loaf. 16+2 means 16 slices and 2 crusts. 18+2 is 18 slices and 2 crusts and therefore thinner than the 16+2.

the "per slice" cost is lower on the thinner loaf, but we dont buy bread by the slice do we?

sorry for the highly irresponsible "sensible" answer of the thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Boring answer maybe but we bake our own. We've got a very old bread making machine (a real machine - not Mrs GH) but cheaper than buying and you know what goes in it. Slices start thin but as you are getting to the end of the loaf it's not so easy and the slices get a bit erratic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An 800gm loaf goes through a cutting grid. the grid is spaced for thick or medium or thin - end of. the only reasonable argument would be that the thin cutter has more blades and they need replacing at a greater rate than the thick cutter.

when I buy my bread, it is based on the slice count per loaf. 16+2 means 16 slices and 2 crusts. 18+2 is 18 slices and 2 crusts and therefore thinner than the 16+2.

the "per slice" cost is lower on the thinner loaf, but we dont buy bread by the slice do we?

sorry for the highly irresponsible "sensible" answer of the thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Latest Activity

    • There’s a few in there which could go either way or I’m not bothered if I miss but think that’s now be pretty set.  Few rubbish clashes like Kasabian/Loyle plus Reytons/Pixies/CMAT but I’ll head with the lads to the most popular one.   (And yes no Byrne or Twigs, just can’t into either)
    • I saw somewhere they were advertising Lewis' day as him live on Glagow Green and only mentioned Amy Mcdonald and CMAT as support, 0 mention of the festival  I completely agree this will probably be the last one which is a shame because the first 2 seemed so promising and now its turned into middle of the road rubbish with acts you can see everywhere else  Anyone know if the BBC are covering it next week as it'll be fascinating to see how full (or empty) it is  
    • Did anyone catch Viagra Boys last night? A rollicking good set, with a little more free jazz than I expected.   if you’re up early, Walabi is doing a super job in the Cupra Pulse. There till six. 
    • Alkaline Trio 90 Barrington Levy 80 Basement Jaxx 120 Billy Bragg 100 Billy Ocean 100 The Black Keys 50 Carl Cox 105  Chase & Status 120 Chelsea Wolfe 75  CMAT 135  Confidence Man 150 MAX David Byrne 150 MAX Disclosure 40  Everything Everything 115  Faithless 110 Fatboy Slim 100 Four Tet 130 Garbage 100 GOAT 105 Greentea Peng 120 Happy Mondays 80  Hollie Cook 90 Jorja Smith 100 José González 100 Joy Crookes 120 Judas Priest 70 Kasabian 40 Kneecap 120  Levellers 85 Linkin Park 90 Lorde 120 Madness 65  The Maccabees 110  Neck Deep 135 Nile Rodgers & Chic 100 Overmono 90 The Prodigy 145 Pulp 150 MAX RAYE 100 Richard Ashcroft 100 Say She She 75 Scissor Sisters 120 Self Esteem 120 Skunk Anansie 100 Stereolab 110 -10  The Streets 110 Super Furry Animals 110 Thundercat 90 Tyler, the Creator 50 Underworld 125  Wet Leg 90 Wilco 95 The Wombats 60 Wolf Alice 150 MAX
    • They really dropped a bollock on their lineup this year. They went with Richard Ashcroft because he did well as Oasis support - But realistically, you're not getting 50k people in a field to hear the 4 or 5 songs they know at like £70+ a ticket. Can't get my head around the Kasabian booking, either. Finsbury Park was a bold move for them, and yes it sold out, but I think you're more likely to see people make the journey to London if they want to see them rather than Glasgow. A second similar capacity show was always going to be a big ask for them.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...