Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

WWE


lharris92

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, pink_triangle said:

Is it a good use of Daniel Bryan to bring him back on the 5th biggest match on the card? I would be tempted to hold off.

So no DB at Mania? The crowd would riot! 

Who knows what they'll do.

What if the match is for KO and SZ career in WWE vs Shane and DB. DB turns on Shane then the boys win. Next night on Raw the Yep! Movement of DB, KO and SZ turn up. Heel faction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, WS_Jack_III said:

So no DB at Mania? The crowd would riot! 

Who knows what they'll do.

What if the match is for KO and SZ career in WWE vs Shane and DB. DB turns on Shane then the boys win. Next night on Raw the Yep! Movement of DB, KO and SZ turn up. Heel faction.

I would be tempted to make him ref or accompany Shane. I think a DB heel turn would work as badly as when WCW tried it with Sting and Goldberg.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, pink_triangle said:

I would be tempted to make him ref or accompany Shane. I think a DB heel turn would work as badly as when WCW tried it with Sting and Goldberg.

I'm not fully aware of his run. He does seem like an everyman babyface but he has had heel runs before right? 

 

Those drop kicks the other day though... surely he's going to Mania.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, DareToDibble said:

Not sure how they'll work this into the storylines but I have a funny feeling they're somehow going to make Elias Braun's partner. Which could actually be quite good!

They've done it all wrong. Braun shouldn't want a partner but every jobber should be queuing up to be his partner because he's basically a free shot at getting a title. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, pink_triangle said:

7 hours of Mania (like most WWE specials/ppv) is way too long. It kill the crowd and the atmosphere.

Agree, people in the audience get tired for the main events 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, jump said:

It's so strange the Cena/Undertaker bit is left hanging, it's a few days before 'mania and I ain't got a clue if the match is happening or not.

They've done it the way i want, hopefully.

 

I want them to interview Cena in the crowd asking how disappointed he is about it and then we hear the bell ring while he is talking about being their as a fan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, WS_Jack_III said:

They've done it the way i want, hopefully.

 

I want them to interview Cena in the crowd asking how disappointed he is about it and then we hear the bell ring while he is talking about being their as a fan.

That'd would have worked a lot better if it was Cena hosting 'mania and then had an improv open challenge with Taker answering imo, Cena not booked doesn't make sense to me and I just don't like this build up.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Andre91 said:

American Bad Ass is happening, I’m certain. Or at least some hybrid that is way closer to Mark Calaway than The Deadman character. 

That's one way around the Undertaker has retired shtick they've been half arssing but I doubt he'd give up Deadman as it's too iconic with too few a chance for him to keep playing the character.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Andre91 said:

This Mania card is stacked from top to bottom, what are you on about :P

In my view most of the matches wouldn't look out of place on raw or smackdown. Of those that are more special attractions I have little  interest in seeing HHH, Angle or Taker in 2018. 

I think there are too many multi people/team feuds for the secondary titles. To me the one on one feuds are generally the best.

I also think most of the build up of the feuds has been poor. The likes of AJ v Nakamura seems to be built purely around having a good match, I like to see a bit more storyline added in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rousey should be the highlight of it but she is making her debut teaming with a 50 year old man who looks like hes one Angle slam away from a trip to the cardiac unit, against another 50 year old man and a very unathletic woman who has never wrestled. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, pink_triangle said:

In my view most of the matches wouldn't look out of place on raw or smackdown. Of those that are more special attractions I have little  interest in seeing HHH, Angle or Taker in 2018. 

I think there are too many multi people/team feuds for the secondary titles. To me the one on one feuds are generally the best.

I also think most of the build up of the feuds has been poor. The likes of AJ v Nakamura seems to be built purely around having a good match, I like to see a bit more storyline added in.

It is lacking an apex of a feud like Rollins vs Trips or Owens vs Jericho from last year (which I sort of see Shane & Bryan vs Owens & Sami as) but it doesn't take away from the solid card this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...