Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

WWE


lharris92

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, WS_Jack_III said:

Seems like Vince is taking more and more of a step back. 205 live now under HHH rule? 

 

Apparently WWE are open to a merger too, wonder how that would work out. 

 

Thought both shows were decent this week. Braun is great btw, so so great.

I struggle to see how doing things like taking the power PowerPoint off Gulak is a good thing. I'm not convinced Increased HHH influence is such a good thing.

I'm also not certain that ending brand specific ppv is a good idea. It will reduce opportunities for people trying to move up the card. It will also probably create longer ppv shows. To me 2 hours 40 minutes is fine. I rarely hear people watch a show and wish it was longer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, WS_Jack_III said:

Who knows just supposedly they are open to it. Disney are buying everything up atm.

The story I heard was Vince was selling a small amount of his shares into get funds for the XFL and Fox (a side company of Fox which Disney wont own) felt they wasted their money on UFC TV rights compared to what they could get WWE rights for. So they approached WWE about just out right buying them rather than just replacing UFC tv for WWE tv as they figured it'd be a good deal but WWE aren't interested in selling as the McMahon's want to keep control.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, pink_triangle said:

I struggle to see how doing things like taking the power PowerPoint off Gulak is a good thing. I'm not convinced Increased HHH influence is such a good thing.

I'm also not certain that ending brand specific ppv is a good idea. It will reduce opportunities for people trying to move up the card. It will also probably create longer ppv shows. To me 2 hours 40 minutes is fine. I rarely hear people watch a show and wish it was longer.

Gulak has been a stand out for sure. I never said it was good or bad. NXT is great though and that's HHH right? 

 

Everytime i watch a Takeover i just wish the whole NXT team were doing a main roster show (probably SDL).

Mauro Ranallo is the best commentator they have by an absolute mile!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, WS_Jack_III said:

Gulak has been a stand out for sure. I never said it was good or bad. NXT is great though and that's HHH right? 

 

Everytime i watch a Takeover i just wish the whole NXT team were doing a main roster show (probably SDL).

Mauro Ranallo is the best commentator they have by an absolute mile!

I like NXT, but I think it's debatable that making the main shows more like NXT will make them better or more popular. NXT also has a huge advantage in terms of it's length that the main shows can never have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is Ronda really a massive star still?

While she was on her winning streak in UFC she was getting movie offers left, right & centre & was even rumoured to be starring in a remake of Road House as lead but since those loses all those plans have been scrapped. 

I don't see her in chat shows or working the media at all and from the UFC people/forums I speak to while what she accomplished is still respected she’s now quite derided. 

I wonder if she will actually be that good as personally I don’t have high hopes for her, I see it being like when CM Punk switched the other way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, metallimuse said:

Is Ronda really a massive star still?

She is yeah. She did massive things for womens fighting across all disciplines. Shes an Olympian who won a medal but MMA passed her by pretty quickly. Can't just do judo forever and hope to get away with it. 

Will be interested to see what her style is like wrestling. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know who she is, my question was is she STILL a massive draw.

She did all you mentioned and did great numbers for UFC PPVs but like I said, she had a LOT of projects all lined up when she was riding the wave but a couple of loses (and in my opinion, her shitty attitude) and that all fell away and we haven’t really heard of her or seen her working the media or anything.

I’m sure Wrestlemania she will get attention but in my opinion Wrestlemania will always get mainstream attention anyway, undoubtedly she will help draw some more, after that I don’t see her being this huge massive star and a jewel in the crown.

I personally feel like the women’s division & the things these girls have accomplished and pushed it's prominence is incredible, I would NEVER of imagined when I was a kid watching we would see a 30 woman royal rumble let alone have it headline the actual PPV.

I don’t think Ronda can hang with them in any way. I don’t think she can work the mic, I don’t think her wrestling will be as good and the only character I can see her having is a Brock style & why do I wanna see an imitation? For me, she’s the female Roman Reigns.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 17/02/2018 at 2:08 PM, metallimuse said:

I know who she is, my question was is she STILL a massive draw.

She did all you mentioned and did great numbers for UFC PPVs but like I said, she had a LOT of projects all lined up when she was riding the wave but a couple of loses (and in my opinion, her shitty attitude) and that all fell away and we haven’t really heard of her or seen her working the media or anything.

I’m sure Wrestlemania she will get attention but in my opinion Wrestlemania will always get mainstream attention anyway, undoubtedly she will help draw some more, after that I don’t see her being this huge massive star and a jewel in the crown.

I personally feel like the women’s division & the things these girls have accomplished and pushed it's prominence is incredible, I would NEVER of imagined when I was a kid watching we would see a 30 woman royal rumble let alone have it headline the actual PPV.

I don’t think Ronda can hang with them in any way. I don’t think she can work the mic, I don’t think her wrestling will be as good and the only character I can see her having is a Brock style & why do I wanna see an imitation? For me, she’s the female Roman Reigns.

 

I can she can be the female Kurt Angle, if transforms well into WWE.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/17/2018 at 1:08 PM, metallimuse said:

I don’t think Ronda can hang with them in any way. I don’t think she can work the mic, I don’t think her wrestling will be as good and the only character I can see her having is a Brock style & why do I wanna see an imitation? For me, she’s the female Roman Reigns.

 

We haven't even seen her in the ring yet or on the mic.

She's been working at all these things like anyone else hasn't she?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know we touched on this a few pages back but having just watched Raw... Asuka's promos are actually getting worse, which I didn't think would be possible. She's good in the ring but she's no better than people like Charlotte and Alexa Bliss. Maybe I'm being a bit harsh but I don't get it. It seems like people who come up from NXT are already over but I can't say I watch it enough to know if it's always justified.

On another note - Rollins was fantastic! :o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, luckysalt said:

I know the WWE hall of fame is a load of shite, its just politics, but its that main reason I thought I would NEVER see Jeff Jarrett in.

Seems crazy that hes going in, really does.

I’m sure WWE paid for his recent stint in rehab end of last year so I think their relationship has stemmed from there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seth Rollins was immense. What a performance. 

I can not understand why they aren’t pushing Braun to the very top. He’s exactly what you’d expect Vince to love looks wise, he’s improved massively in the ring, can cut a promo and he’s the most I’ve guy since Daniel Bryan week in week out. Everyone loves him. 

Edited by Andre91
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Andre91 said:

Seth Rollins was immense. What a performance. 

I can not understand why they aren’t pushing Braun to the very top. He’s exactly what you’d expect Vince to love looks wise, he’s improved massively in the ring, can cut a promo and he’s the most I’ve guy since Daniel Bryan week in week out. Everyone loves him. 

They don't do what we want. Look at Rusev too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 22/02/2018 at 10:36 PM, Andre91 said:

Seth Rollins was immense. What a performance. 

I can not understand why they aren’t pushing Braun to the very top. He’s exactly what you’d expect Vince to love looks wise, he’s improved massively in the ring, can cut a promo and he’s the most I’ve guy since Daniel Bryan week in week out. Everyone loves him. 

I would expect Braun to be Reigns main competition once Brock is out of the picture post Mania. I can see him taking the title come SummerSlam with possibly him v a returning Brock by Mania next year.

I’m off to see some live wrestling today around Leeds, hoping to get to meet Grado..it’s yersel!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...