The Dirty Independence Question

[kaosmark2]

26 minutes ago, LJS said:

Why are you asking questions which you already know the answer to?

You not liking the result isn't sufficient reason. Same as me with Brexit.

[LJS]

10 hours ago, kaosmark2 said:

You not liking the result isn't sufficient reason.

 

I agree

 

[LJS]

Just for reference, for the next time Neil posts something that suggests Alex Salmond still has some relevance in Scottish politics.

 

[LJS]

3 minutes ago, Barry Fish said:

Its kind of sad that there is a huge debate to be had over this stuff but you won't engage in it @LJS

What sort of stuff, @Barry Fish?

Edited December 8, 2022 by LJS

[LJS]

5 minutes ago, Barry Fish said:

Any sort of a reasonable question.  Plenty have been asked.  If you are not going to engage then who will.  Its just become stamping of feet - which is unsurprisingly how most of us now view Sturgeon.  

You won't gain independence by stamping your feet and screaming like a toddler....

I've been answering questions (some reasonable, some less so) on here for so long, it seems like a generation!

I don't waste my time answering questions I have answered countless times before... Like all the once in a generation shite.

(Stamps feet & leaves)

Edited December 8, 2022 by LJS

[LJS]

the truth is out...

[Neil]

i see the voting for gender recognition last night went down badly with scots

https://wingsoverscotland.com/the-disgraces-of-scotland/

 

[LJS]

6 hours ago, Neil said:

i see the voting for gender recognition last night went down badly with scots

https://wingsoverscotland.com/the-disgraces-of-scotland/

 

Linking to W*n*s over Scotland now Neil?

 

Never thought I'd see the day🤔 .              You are aware that a sad bigoted fucker in Bath is not representative of "Scots"

 

[kaosmark2]

1 minute ago, LJS said:

Linking to W*n*s over Scotland now Neil?

 

Never thought I'd see the day🤔 .              You are aware that a sad bigoted fucker in Bath is not representative of "Scots"

Didn't you defend him a couple of times?

[LJS]

Just now, kaosmark2 said:

Didn't you defend him a couple of times?

I used to have mixed feelings about him. He did some good stuff but was clearly always a dick.

He now behaves like the lovechild of Graham Linehan & J K Rowling with a dash of Jeremy Clarkson thrown in.

 

[kaosmark2]

12 minutes ago, LJS said:

I used to have mixed feelings about him. He did some good stuff but was clearly always a dick.

He now behaves like the lovechild of Graham Linehan & J K Rowling with a dash of Jeremy Clarkson thrown in.

Fair enough. I'm of the opinion that he's always been a shitbag, but I'm not going to argue that ties you to his stances forever.

[Neil]

The same disgrace of Scotland was trending on twitter. So representative of a lot of Scots by the look of things. The snippers love the denyibility of wings. 

[LJS]

2 minutes ago, Neil said:

The same disgrace of Scotland was trending on twitter. So representative of a lot of Scots by the look of things. The snippers love the denyibility of wings. 

Jeremy Clarkson was trending on twitter.

Does that mean he speaks for you?

 

[Neil]

1 minute ago, LJS said:

Jeremy Clarkson was trending on twitter.

Does that mean he speaks for you?

 

Clarkson isn't my Govt which I've claimed to be fantastic. 

[LJS]

1 minute ago, Neil said:

Clarkson isn't my Govt which I've claimed to be fantastic. 

Neither is the w*n*er of Bath.

[Neil]

10 minutes ago, LJS said:

Neither is the w*n*er of Bath.

if the SG is representing the best of Scotland (as you've claimed) then Scotland thinks sex offenders should be enabled to do worse, and wings simply highlighted what happened. 

[LJS]

1 minute ago, Neil said:

if the SG is representing the best of Scotland (as you've claimed)

 

What are you on about?

1 minute ago, Neil said:

 

then Scotland thinks sex offenders should be enabled to do worse, and wings simply highlighted what happened. 

I take a different view. If there is a threat to women (& there is no "if" about it) it comes from men who very much identify as men & would boot you in the bollocks if you dared to suggest otherwise.

[kaosmark2]

Trans rights and women's rights are not in conflict. Only homphobes argue as much now, using the same bullshit arguments as in the 80s. 

[Neil]

5 minutes ago, LJS said:

What are you on about?

scots governing themselves.

 

5 minutes ago, LJS said:

I take a different view. If there is a threat to women (& there is no "if" about it) it comes from men who very much identify as men & would boot you in the bollocks if you dared to suggest otherwise.

the main threat is to the right of women to have women-only spaces.

[LJS]

44 minutes ago, Neil said:

scots governing themselves.

 

the main threat is to the right of women to have women-only spaces.

Really? And what is to stop me slipping on a frock & entering a woman only space tomorrow?

[Neil]

14 minutes ago, LJS said:

Really? And what is to stop me slipping on a frock & entering a woman only space tomorrow?

are you a sex offender who've been granted that right by your govt?

Edited December 21, 2022 by Neil

[LJS]

Just now, Neil said:

are you a sex offender who've been granted that right by your govt?

No idea what you are on about, Neil.

[kaosmark2]

1 hour ago, Neil said:

 

the main threat is to the right of women to have women-only spaces.

That's absolute bollocks

[LJS]

Bloody SNP.

 

[Neil]

1 hour ago, LJS said:

No idea what you are on about, Neil.

perhaps read the wings i linked to - to understand how your govt voted. and why they're considered (by many scots) to be "a disgrace".

Edited December 21, 2022 by Neil