Jump to content

Bands that should never have headlined


Guest worthyraver
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 94
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Whether you thought the set was dull or great, its hard to say against the choice of Bruce as headliner. One of the most acclaimed and biggest selling live artists in the world isn't really a bad 'choice'... not really comparable to Rod- whether it was ultimately a success or not.

I agree with this 100%, despite thinking that Bruce was a bland as it gets.

Whatever I think of his music or his performance on the night, there's no doubt that in advance he was very worthy of the slot, far more so than probably 90%+ of the bands who have headlined over the years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

a lot of these responses have been to the quality of the set, rather than the quality of the booking, as in whether they had done enough in their careers to warrant the prestige of a Glastonbury Pyramid headline slot. Taking that angle...

Skunk Anansie have to be the absolute most mind-boggling headliner booking ever

I think Killers, Artic Monkeys, Prodigy (1997 - when Smashing Pumpkins surely should have been billed on top of them), and Travis, all jumped the queue a bit.

Moby was questionable in '03. But i think it was an era where they figured they always tried to add in a club/dance/dj headline act from time-to-time (Chems, Moby, Prodigy)

Muse in '04 raised eyebrows when announced, but give credit to Glasto for knowing full well how they would pull it off. A career-defining performance.

Stevie Winwood called in sick in '97, but that was a strange initial choice to close out the festival.

Also, you can't blame Ash, Basement Jaxx, Gorillaz as they were all late replacements.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

a lot of these responses have been to the quality of the set, rather than the quality of the booking, as in whether they had done enough in their careers to warrant the prestige of a Glastonbury Pyramid headline slot. Taking that angle...

Skunk Anansie have to be the absolute most mind-boggling headliner booking ever

I think Killers, Artic Monkeys, Prodigy (1997 - when Smashing Pumpkins surely should have been billed on top of them), and Travis, all jumped the queue a bit.

Moby was questionable in '03. But i think it was an era where they figured they always tried to add in a club/dance/dj headline act from time-to-time (Chems, Moby, Prodigy)

Muse in '04 raised eyebrows when announced, but give credit to Glasto for knowing full well how they would pull it off. A career-defining performance.

Stevie Winwood called in sick in '97, but that was a strange initial choice to close out the festival.

Also, you can't blame Ash, Basement Jaxx, Gorillaz as they were all late replacements.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd say Kings of Leon. I wasn't there so I can't judge whether they pulled it off, but it has clearly had a detrimental effect on them. I remember reading that they said being given that slot made them feel they needed to write more anthems; the result? One of the worst albums of the last 10 years (from a good band) and a complete selling out. Had they not been thrust into the headline slot perhaps they wouldn't have approached Only by the Night the way they did. Who knows, however for me Glasto was the beginning of their fall from grace.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Basement Jaxx (should have been the Scream :) )

Rod Sterwart

Chemical Brothers and Travis seem to be rather weak

in retrospect the duo of Fun Lovin' Criminals and Skunk Anansie is weak... but i would fecking love it. and from what i've seen Skunk Anasie nailed it

People will be naive and say Gorillaz. These people are wrong :)

Edited by Vieuphoria
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd say Kings of Leon. I wasn't there so I can't judge whether they pulled it off, but it has clearly had a detrimental effect on them. I remember reading that they said being given that slot made them feel they needed to write more anthems; the result? One of the worst albums of the last 10 years (from a good band) and a complete selling out. Had they not been thrust into the headline slot perhaps they wouldn't have approached Only by the Night the way they did. Who knows, however for me Glasto was the beginning of their fall from grace.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd say Kings of Leon. I wasn't there so I can't judge whether they pulled it off, but it has clearly had a detrimental effect on them. I remember reading that they said being given that slot made them feel they needed to write more anthems; the result? One of the worst albums of the last 10 years (from a good band) and a complete selling out. Had they not been thrust into the headline slot perhaps they wouldn't have approached Only by the Night the way they did. Who knows, however for me Glasto was the beginning of their fall from grace.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am by no means a fan of his and I only saw the first 20 minutes, but he did seem to be putting on a good show, the field was packed and people were loving it. He certainly seemed to have a good idea of how to play to a festival crowd i.e: he realised the people were not there just to see him and his set reflected this, at least the first 20 minutes did.

I had to be elsewhere, David Seaman in dance west I believe, otherwise I may well have stayed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bruce Springsteen was f**king awful IMO.

Couple of songs you know - hour and three quarters of stuff only the hardcore fans do - handful of tracks you know - goodnight.

What a load of shite. Interestingly, NME named it amongst their 20 great Glasto sets, and somehow ignored Blur from last year :rolleyes:

Edited by OneLittleFish
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whether you thought the set was dull or great, its hard to say against the choice of Bruce as headliner. One of the most acclaimed and biggest selling live artists in the world isn't really a bad 'choice'... not really comparable to Rod- whether it was ultimately a success or not.

Edited by Craigston
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You say that as if Bruce is a typical NME band? Easy answer- don't read the shite. Although me and my mates and the majority of people I spoke to enjoyed Bruce, although Neil had a very different experience which is fair enough.

It was an awful lot more than just me. Asking people if they'd seen him/enjoyed him the next day, nearly everyone I asked said it had bored them rigid.

I'm not claiming my little survey was scientifically accurate, but I think it's more than reasonable to deduce from the responses I got that there were a large number of people that were far from impressed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...