Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

stone me!


Guest eFestivals

Recommended Posts

\

I think you'd probably need to listen to Talking Book, Innervisions, Fulfingness Final Finale and Songs in the Key of Life really. A lot of the famous singles don't do him credit.

Mind you, anyone who doesn't get a groove going on to Superstisious is with soul. Official, that is.

Personally, I could listen to "Please Don't Go" off FFF over and over and over quite happily. I love a crescendo me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 325
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Not the same sort of set or show but I'd love to see Bill Wyman's Rythmn Kings. A class bunch of musicians, including Georgie Fame, who've nothing left to prove but who still really enjoy playing. And Beverley Skeete is an awesome singer.

Edited by grumpyhack
Link to comment
Share on other sites

seems to me that Ronnie's the bigger liability these days...

and, really, they didn't exactly improve when he joined, did they...?

I was told that there's been a back-up guitarist (who we don't see...) for the last tour or 2, as Keith is sufferring from something like rheumatism in his hands

maybe it's that time...?? :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They've been asked to paly sssssssssssooooooooooo many times but have ALWAYS refused due to the lack of ££££ offereed by Michael. They have got the spirit/ethos of the festival at heart, so i wouldn't be upset if they didn't play. However, as it's the big 40th ann, they'd be an excellent addition to the bill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
I'm going to go into denial mode and refuse to believe they won't be playing until I see the final list. And even then I will still think they will do a secret set at some point.

Don't let the facts get in the way

We got a further comment out of the Stones PR people yesterday, saying that they wouldn't be playing festivals either.

And as the Stones don't do one-off performances, and, I'm told by various stones complete-nutters, they certainly wouldn't do a televised appearance without first doing a handful of warm-up shows (they're terrified of coming across crap, it's said), it does seem extremely unlikely that they're playing.

I'm now pretty sure that they've abandoned all plans to tour/play live for the moment, because of Ronnie going on the piss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
Exactly!!!! I’m not giving up hope until they turn around and say listen you bunch of Glastobating stalkers where not fu***** doing Glastonbury now leave us the fu** alone.

The dream is still alive!!!!!

The Stones don't do one-offs.

And the statement has been expanded to include "no festivals".

Any dreams will remain just dreams, I'm pretty sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
Also, if the Stones can keep it together with Keef on smack, as he was for the entire 1970s, Im sure they could do a tour with Ronnie drunk. Lets face it, Keith gave up smack in the early 80s and has been a vodka addict since then.

I believe that the issue with Ronnie is to do with getting insurance for the tour (there's been a few newspaper reports about it) .... while things might have been (and probably were) different in the past, today the Stones are a huge corporate machine, and a machine that only gets off its arse to do anything if the result is a massive financial windfall with no risks.

If they can't get insurance then the band carry the risk, and seeing as they'd only tour to make huge amounts of money and not to lose huge amounts of money, I'd guess that they're simply not prepared to take the risk of touring with Ronnie in case things do go tits-up, and I'd guess that they aren't keen to replace him as that would tarnish further an already getting-tarnished brand which would similarly risk impacting on what they can earn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe that the issue with Ronnie is to do with getting insurance for the tour (there's been a few newspaper reports about it) .... while things might have been (and probably were) different in the past, today the Stones are a huge corporate machine, and a machine that only gets off its arse to do anything if the result is a massive financial windfall with no risks.

If they can't get insurance then the band carry the risk, and seeing as they'd only tour to make huge amounts of money and not to lose huge amounts of money, I'd guess that they're simply not prepared to take the risk of touring with Ronnie in case things do go tits-up, and I'd guess that they aren't keen to replace him as that would tarnish further an already getting-tarnished brand which would similarly risk impacting on what they can earn.

Edited by The Nal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...