Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Who's watching what on tv


tinygreendragon

Recommended Posts

On 3/8/2019 at 10:50 AM, WS_Jack_III said:

I was born in 1990 so my first knowledge of MJ being dodgy around kids was in 2003 after that C4 doc. He was clearly the biggest star on the planet late 80s early 90s, were there rumblings of his behavior back then? I know something happened in 93 but I mean before that, didn't people find it extremely odd that he was "best friends" with young boys.

I can't remember when the rumours started, but he was so eccentric and immature, as we thought.

We assumed the children's paradise was for him, not the affluent grooming version of a puppy or sweets.

Edited by feral chile
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, WS_Jack_III said:

Need to get on that.

 

This new Partridge stuff has really got going now, the corporate punishment segment was hilarious. 

 

Developing quite the crush on Susannah Fielding too ?

*Corporal

 

Episode 9 of AD is great, GOB with loads of great lines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Finished AD. So I thought the back half was better than first half of S5. Big drawbacks being a lot of it being ADR recording that sounded out of place, who ever was in charge of that didn't do a great job. Some shoddy green screen again (but part of me wonders if they are doing that deliberately now) and the cast not all being there.

 

The last few episodes show us scenes from yesteryear (with Cobie Smulders playing a young Lucille), which I first thought were very out of place but there's a reason for it that is revealed later on. Lots of the loose ends from season 4 are dealt with and some of them are funny pay offs.

 

All round I think it was an okay effort, much like how I thought S4 was an okay effort. Things are never as good the second time round. It definitely felt like they are ending it, which would be the correct call considering all that has happened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, HeyPorter said:

A couple of episodes in now and struggling with the poor sound mixing. Still finding it better than season 4 so far but really hope they leave it alone after this. 

Bad isn't it, I honestly think I could have done that better. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎3‎/‎12‎/‎2019 at 4:17 PM, djdavejohnson said:

I did however find time last night to catch up on the first two episodes of Race Across the World. It's currently airing on the BBC on Sunday nights and is also available on the iplayer. It's a great watch and if you're into your travel there are some decent references to lots of places worth visitng. Great concept too, looking forward to the next episode.

I have seen the first 2. Not something I would really like but actually have. Will be watching the rest.

 

Odd, this year I am watching quite a bit of TV past few years I have only watched a few select things. Not sure why. Maybe as the weather gets better I will be outside more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Love, Death & Robots.

Only seen the first episode But Just Wow!

Computer Animation & Sci-Fi turned up to a thousand and eleven. Awesome stuff. Not for kids. I hope the rest match up.

On a more earthly note, James May's Big Trouble In Model Britain. That Hornby museum is relatively just up the road from me. I've driven past it so many times. I can't believe I've never been in there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 21 March 2019 at 12:27 PM, fred quimby said:

Been watching Fleabag on Iplayer and an enjoying that

Fleabag followed by Jerk is up there with the days when The Man From Auntie followed French & Saunders (or was it the other way 'round?).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, MrZigster said:

Fleabag followed by Jerk is up there with the days when The Man From Auntie followed French & Saunders (or was it the other way 'round?).

It was all about Friday nights on 4. My classic line-up woud probably be: Cheers, Roseanne, Whose Line? and The Word.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...