Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Bruce Springsteen


The Nal

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 478
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

10 hours ago, Wooderson said:

People was always have a moan about Springsteen. Incessantly and without fail.

Im keen as mustard to experience these shows. Bruce made big effort to stitch this album together as a single piece. Going to be fascinating. 

He just plays the songs in order. What big effort did he make?

Lots of Bruce fans opinions on full album shows wavering in the face of a new tour. Which is a worry and could start a trend. "Electric Nebraska" next. Big box set, world tour, outtakes etc. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, The Nal said:

He just plays the songs in order. What big effort did he make?

Lots of Bruce fans opinions on full album shows wavering in the face of a new tour. Which is a worry and could start a trend. "Electric Nebraska" next. Big box set, world tour, outtakes etc. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whilst intently ranking his records generally and putting a crabby, bitter little album like D&D ahead of a sprawling brave epic like The River comes across as trolling, what a career he's had that you might even *think* it - and as you say, that there's a time when it's true. Most other artists put out The River and its their "classic".

Edited by Wooderson
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/23/2016 at 8:17 PM, Bobs said:

 

I'd say its going to be enjoyable, but as someone who loves Springsteen live because of its wide variation show-to-show, having 21 songs already pre-determined (thats before BTR, The Rising, Shout (which i think is a huge waste), and the other typicals), it leaves like 4-6 songs left, which for me takes a way a bit of the magic. It'll still be awesome, but no where near as good as him just playing a mixed batch.

5

 

He's been doing 35 song sets on the american leg so a good 12-14 more, so if he gets on stage on time at 7.30 it could be the same here. Most of the "classics" are the hits, with each time a couple of darkness/Born to run/born in the usa album tracks, plus a couple of the newer ones like the rising. Very hits heavy though, but as ive only seen him at glastonbury, that shocking hyde park gig in 2012 and leeds arena (good but very eclectic mix) i'm happy with an old school hits type set, plus i love the river!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, efcfanwirral said:

 

He's been doing 35 song sets on the american leg so a good 12-14 more, so if he gets on stage on time at 7.30 it could be the same here. Most of the "classics" are the hits, with each time a couple of darkness/Born to run/born in the usa album tracks, plus a couple of the newer ones like the rising. Very hits heavy though, but as ive only seen him at glastonbury, that shocking hyde park gig in 2012 and leeds arena (good but very eclectic mix) i'm happy with an old school hits type set, plus i love the river!

Yeah thats what I mean, he's got his regulars like Born to Run, The Rising, so it ends up about 6-8 different. It's gonna be fun. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I'm torn. I'm not overly fussed on parts of the River, but there are no doubt some brilliant songs on it. £80+ might be a bit too much for me. Though I'd pay that to see Darkness in a heart beat. 

Is he still doing that ridiculous gold circle thing too?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, zero000 said:

I'm torn. I'm not overly fussed on parts of the River, but there are no doubt some brilliant songs on it. £80+ might be a bit too much for me. Though I'd pay that to see Darkness in a heart beat. 

Is he still doing that ridiculous gold circle thing too?

Paris and a couple of the German dates the only venues where you could pay to get up the front. Everywhere else you queue and takes yer chances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

So the setlist from the first River european gig sees only half of the album being played. Probably not a bad idea for a stadium gig.

On other matters, some dick just 'accidentally' put their tickets for Wembley up twice on Twickets, meaning I've just paid £420 for 4 tickets that aren't actually real!!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 16 May 2016 at 1:07 PM, Badlands said:

So the setlist from the first River european gig sees only half of the album being played. Probably not a bad idea for a stadium gig.

On other matters, some dick just 'accidentally' put their tickets for Wembley up twice on Twickets, meaning I've just paid £420 for 4 tickets that aren't actually real!!

 

Great fecking gig though. Works better as a set now than just a straight run through of the album. Great crowd - solid set. Felt like I'd been shot in the legs the day after which is always a good sign. And I got to finally see Price You Pay and Drive All Night after 35 years of Springsteen gigs

Roll on Manchester

Edited by Ted Dansons Wig
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at the setlists from the first 2 european shows.. I wouldn't mind if we got something similar at Coventry in a couple weeks time. As long as he keeps Point Blank in the set, then all is good from my perspective.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, incident said:

Looking at the setlists from the first 2 european shows.. I wouldn't mind if we got something similar at Coventry in a couple weeks time. As long as he keeps Point Blank in the set, then all is good from my perspective.

3-4 of the River tunes aside I'd change the entire set!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every time I come on this thread I seem to rant about tickets and such, but anyway...

Gave in and bought tix for Coventry the other day, really looking forward to it. However, despite standing being 'sold out' for months, suddenly a load come onto Ticketmaster for a few days a week or so before the gig? Definitely ones that they haven't sold on Get Me In :lol: Pisses me off cos it creates a false sense of demand and drives the price up. 

Same has happened with Neil Young (I think... at least I can get standing for the O2 now if I try, where as I'm sure it sold out at one point) and Radiohead (although that may be to stop touts, rather than it being the touts themselves). 

Positive being that Springsteen Hampden seems to have been a success for those who bought late, tonnes of tickets going for below face value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...