Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2025 Headliners


Guest

Recommended Posts

47 minutes ago, charlierc said:

Do they even need help creating rumours on who's playing so it sells tickets? It's already one of the most oversaturated things that people request tickets for.

 

The festival didn't create this rumour to sell tickets.

 

As incident says, a newspaper has created it to generate page clicks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

 

The festival didn't create this rumour to sell tickets.

 

As incident says, a newspaper has created it to generate page clicks.

 

And like a lot of the nonsense printed in the media, people lap it up. Actually, I don't think the "story" has circulated far enough for it to have any impact on this week's sale but it's a fair discussion. 

 

How great would it be if they had managed to persuade her for 2025 though? I don't think I'd be there but it would be seismic for the festival.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Minor update from my end:

 

Nothing more on Stevie at this point, besides the bit of into I did get.

 

As for the other name I had for the Saturday - it turns out I was on the end of a well thought out wind up. I won't go into detail, so that can be discarded.

 

Personally, (based on nothing but guesswork) I'd still back Fred to be the third; but it's nothing more than a guess at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, mufcok said:

Minor update from my end:

 

Nothing more on Stevie at this point, besides the bit of into I did get.

 

As for the other name I had for the Saturday - it turns out I was on the end of a well thought out wind up. I won't go into detail, so that can be discarded.

 

Personally, (based on nothing but guesswork) I'd still back Fred to be the third; but it's nothing more than a guess at this point.

Thanks! 3rd alongside Fender and O-Rod or O-Rod and someone else? I’m losing track (sorry). 

Edited by CantWaitForGlasto22
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, CantWaitForGlasto22 said:

Thanks! 3rd alongside Fender and O-Rod or O-Rod and someone else? I’m losing track (sorry). 

 

When I say third, I'm talking Rodrigo, Stevie + one more, only going off what I've had thus far.

 

To my knowledge Fender is just based on what's been announced for him so far, unless I've missed some other info? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, mufcok said:

 

When I say third, I'm talking Rodrigo, Stevie + one more, only going off what I've had thus far.

 

To my knowledge Fender is just based on what's been announced for him so far, unless I've missed some other info? 

Nice one.

 

Rihanna, Olivia, Fender

Nick Cave, Paramore, Charli 

 

Has been heard elsewhere. That's quite grim if so. 

Edited by northernangel
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Out of interest, can someone fill in the below gaps for me:

 

What's the Rhianna speculation based on? Seems she's always linked.

 

Am I right in saying Stevie was in the mix at one point last year but it died off, for a specific reason? (I have illness in my head)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mufcok said:

Out of interest, can someone fill in the below gaps for me:

 

What's the Rhianna speculation based on? Seems she's always linked.

 

Am I right in saying Stevie was in the mix at one point last year but it died off, for a specific reason? (I have illness in my head)

Stevie was apparently booked after Madonna pulled out. He then became ill, then cancelled  - leading to Sza replacing him. All allegedly, mind. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, mufcok said:

Out of interest, can someone fill in the below gaps for me:

 

What's the Rhianna speculation based on? Seems she's always linked.

 

Am I right in saying Stevie was in the mix at one point last year but it died off, for a specific reason? (I have illness in my head)

 

6 minutes ago, EthelBailey said:

Stevie was apparently booked after Madonna pulled out. He then became ill, then cancelled  - leading to Sza replacing him. All allegedly, mind. 

Basically this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, EthelBailey said:

@mufcok out of curiosity, who was the headliner you were lead to be believe was booked before it turned out to be a load of rubbish….? 

 

Haha, not now. May tell the story when the dust has settled. Stitched up like a kipper.

 

On reflection, I can't believe I bought the evidence

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, northernangel said:

Nice one.

 

Rihanna, Olivia, Fender

Nick Cave, Paramore, Charli 

 

Has been heard elsewhere. That's quite grim if so. 

Apparently according to discord, kaiser chiefs are now subbing instead of paramore. And jlo is now Sunday legend because morrissey pulled out and she is doing bst.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mufcok said:

Out of interest, can someone fill in the below gaps for me:

 

What's the Rhianna speculation based on? Seems she's always linked.

 

Am I right in saying Stevie was in the mix at one point last year but it died off, for a specific reason? (I have illness in my head)

K2SO had info about ‘nuclear tier female pop act touring, and another account on here said Rihanna was on tour

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...