Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2025 Headliners


Guest

Recommended Posts

If fred gets the spot, I can see him being one of those artists that headlines and that's pretty much his career peak. Stormzy is similar, could never see him headlining again now but he had a lot of momentum when he got the slot. Mindblowing to me that Fred is even in the conversation but here we are. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

They'll bother get large-ish crowds. Nothing to rival Reg / Stones / Macca / Coldplay - but bigger than Kendrick / GnR / Arcade Fire, etc.

 

Dua and Billie are probably decent compararisons.

 

Both depend massively who they are up against... if you aren't into their type of music you'll be easily swayed by something you like elsewhere. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, stuie said:

 

Both depend massively who they are up against... if you aren't into their type of music you'll be easily swayed by something you like elsewhere. 

 

To an extent - but it's pretty rare for the Other Stage to have a massively busy headliner. Folk up to the railway tracks and so on.

 

Sounds like Idles maybe had that, but Dua was still playing to a full-ish field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

 

To an extent - but it's pretty rare for the Other Stage to have a massively busy headliner. Folk up to the railway tracks and so on.

 

Sounds like Idles maybe had that, but Dua was still playing to a full-ish field.

 

Yeah, there lots of places to absorb people who don't feel the need to be at the P though. 

 

I meant, artists like Adele, Elton, Beyonce, Sheeran, Stones get massive crowds of people who aren't interested in them normally, but go just because. 

 

The artists I get asked if I saw when I return to the office, but usually didn't!

 

FA and OR aren't that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

They'll bother get large-ish crowds. Nothing to rival Reg / Stones / Macca / Coldplay - but bigger than Kendrick / GnR / Arcade Fire, etc.

 

Dua and Billie are probably decent compararisons.

 

IMG_3494.thumb.jpeg.52c98132d95b636dd8494240ab1af693.jpeg

 

I surveyed the field with about an about to go before Dua. I was on the right side of the stage and realised there was (for the first time?) an entry and exit point for the pit.

 

Basically, you couldn’t get in unless you approached it from the left hand side of the stage. So that meant walking all the way around, up the top, down to the left, and in. I did that with about twenty minutes to spare. 

 

I’m not suggesting she had a small crowd; more that if you have the right pit entry strategy, it’s not that hard to make it down the front, and it was an absolute party 😍

Edited by kalifire
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NorthernSoul52 said:

Interesting. Fred Again is one who I expect the bubble will burst for first, frankly, but we'll see.

 I agree. Hence I think they've gone for who they have. They want to book for females higher up so Olivia makes a lot of sense. Sam's star will continue longer whereas Fred might not even be at his highest when Glastonbury comes lol.

1 hour ago, danbailey80 said:

 

If real, a fascinating incite in to the minds of the group of people who book the main 2 stages that consistently make a camel out of a horse, transcribed by someone with the literary skills of an 8 year old who doesn't know spell/ grammar check.

 

If fake, it makes 50% of what's been discussed on here redundant. 

 

"Sam Fender not on the booking teams radar" is particularly moronic. 

 

 

 

It's not that Sam is not on their booking list, it's that they have chosen Olivia and Fred this time round so by default of that he's not an available option for them right now.

37 minutes ago, gfa said:

It will be busy enough but as i said no busier than Dua Lipa.

 

Why would it be any busier than Dua Lipa, a UK artist with way more hits / more well known here as she's been around longer / generally bigger.

 

Does depend on clashes I guess, Dua Lipa had a pretty easy ride given IDLES were the other headliner

 

I didn't say it would be busy than Dua Lipa but I don't know how big her crowd was further back. What I do know is that before Glastonbury, Olivia outsold her with her own tour with that much ease it's not even a comparison worth speaking about. And we both know if Olivia did a stadium tour instead she equally would sell it. Olivia is basically doing Glastonbury now and will still have tons of people that will go to a next stadium tour with it. Olivia at Glastonbury is a massive booking right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

 

Set will be ripe for a lot of guests on vocals.

 

35 minutes ago, NorthernSoul52 said:

You'd imagine - and possibly hope - so.

I thought the same for Reading and there were none. Honestly, its not for me at all, whole thing left me cold. I don't even like the music apart from that Loving Arms one, so I hope he does play and I get an evening away from the main stage without missing something I like!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

Yeah - I regret not being in the Dua pit, but none of my team were up for it.

I just think in that scenario go for it yourself, I was the only one out of who I went to Glastonbury with and knew that attended that show. Fair to say I was surrounded by a lot of younger girls too. Bearing in mind I'm 37, 30 would still still be younger lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, MEGABOWL said:


 

One is pop-punk who took off in 2020, the second is a Male Dance Act, the third is an R&B act who took off in the 2000s. Dont think they’re similar at all.


I don't think they are similar acts at all but I do think they appeal to the same/similar listeners.
 

I’m all for not having guitar bands every year but I think Rhianna is a pretty disappointing booking tbh if they go through with it. Eminem would be too. Maybe the selection pool for that ‘Big Name’ Sunday headliner just doesn’t work for me this year but there’s so much else on at the same time it don’t really matter in the grand scheme of things

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Crazyfool01 said:

Stevie , Fred and Orod are my current guesses 

It's going to be stevie or Rihanna. I would guess coachella are cashing in on Fred now as well while he's at his height. 

Literally no reason to have Fred randomly appear this year without designs on him and I don't see a way as mentioned that he headlines coachella after reading and his team allow him not to at Glastonbury. It's not as if he played before LDR even.

 

I'd put money on both headlining....in fact I did previously.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, northernangel said:

It's going to be stevie or Rihanna. I would guess coachella are cashing in on Fred now as well while he's at his height. 

Literally no reason to have Fred randomly appear this year without designs on him and I don't see a way as mentioned that he headlines coachella after reading and his team allow him not to at Glastonbury. It's not as if he played before LDR even.

 

I'd put money on both headlining....in fact I did previously.

Personally I’d prefer rhianna over Stevie who I saw last time … in terms of balance though I think Stevie Sunday would be better and one that Michael I think would like to have back . Think Fred personally did well on other stage … several mates raving about him that wouldn’t naturally fall into his area of appeal . Will be next year or never for him in my opinion 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Crazyfool01 said:

Personally I’d prefer rhianna over Stevie who I saw last time … in terms of balance though I think Stevie Sunday would be better and one that Michael I think would like to have back . Think Fred personally did well on other stage … several mates raving about him that wouldn’t naturally fall into his area of appeal . Will be next year or never for him in my opinion 

Exactly why he's going to be next year. If Rihanna agrees it's going to be Rihanna I feel even if Stevie is well as they've not had her do it yet. If she agreed before she'd agreed again. Baby commitments will stop her but I see nothing else doing so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, northernangel said:

Exactly why he's going to be next year. If Rihanna agrees it's going to be Rihanna I feel even if Stevie is well as they've not had her do it yet. If she agreed before she'd agreed again. Baby commitments will stop her but I see nothing else doing so.

 

We went through this forensically a couple of days back and there's no reliable intel that she's ever been signed up to play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CaledonianGonzo said:

 

They're likely to be touring Europe next summer, which is probably more than can be said for Rihanna.

 

That said - nah.

Yeah, that was my assumption. European dates, but got the impression it was very much a one-and-done for them.

 

Whereas, despite what I imagine to be very big costs, I could see U2 wanting to have a crack at it again. (Certainly Bono, at least.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...