Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2025 Headliners


Guest

Recommended Posts

Forgive me if I’m being ignorant but is Dave really big enough at this point to headline? Like I know he headlined R&L a couple of years back but has he really advanced since then? Would be very weak imo especially compared to Rihanna/ Swift and even fender who’s rapidly growing atm and headlined R&L last year 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Aromaticmusic1 said:

Forgive me if I’m being ignorant but is Dave really big enough at this point to headline? Like I know he headlined R&L a couple of years back but has he really advanced since then? Would be very weak imo especially compared to Rihanna/ Swift and even fender who’s rapidly growing atm and headlined R&L last year 

Well he's not released another album since then, but he's had some massive solo/collaborative singles, including one of the biggest of last year.

So yeah, I'd say his career has advanced since then. It certainly hasn't stagnated and will likely grow more with another album under his belt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Aromaticmusic1 said:

Forgive me if I’m being ignorant but is Dave really big enough at this point to headline? Like I know he headlined R&L a couple of years back but has he really advanced since then? Would be very weak imo especially compared to Rihanna/ Swift and even fender who’s rapidly growing atm and headlined R&L last year 

I mean if you compare any that list  to Swift or Rhihana or Swift there small, you rule a lot of potential headlines out if you set the bar at that level. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah. I mean, the stadium pool is only finite, I guess. 

On a broad spectrum, feel most of your "upper" headliners at the twin-main-stage R+L could top the Pyramid - Arctic Monkeys, The Killers and Billie Eilish all have, and Dave, The 1975 and Sam Fender all could too.

This year is a little bit weirder for that metric though, so it definitely varies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, NorthernSoul52 said:

Among the current crop of four "younger" British acts who could step up, I think he's probably fourth in terms of obvious live pull behind Dua Lipa, Sam Fender and The 1975.

But conversely, on the whole, he's either second or third. Really depends how you want to quantify it, I guess.

At some point Harry Styles has to be considered a legit shout.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

We don't even know if she can board a plane to fly....

But she'd be a headliner I reckon..

No way she'd be a headliner.

They wouldn't book her as one, anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SomeoneListeningIn said:

Gotta be legends slot for her if she's booked, right? Especially following on from Cat Stevens setting precedent for an act of similar genre playing in recent years.

i missed their disco albums. 😛 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, JRhys29 said:

At some point Harry Styles has to be considered a legit shout.

I think if you play 2 shows at Wembley Stadium one year then come back and play another 4, you're probably at Pyramid Stage level already.

Though the question is if his tour bookers think there's more value in just doing his own dates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, WhoOdyssey said:

I'll be very surprised if Harry Styles doesn't headline sometime before 2030.

Yeah seems like a total slam dunk in the coming years. Obviously aware of the festival, will be a nice box ticker for him, incredibly popular and is building up a setlist of bangers. One of the front runners in the next couple of years whenever he releases album #4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Aromaticmusic1 said:

Could he possibly do it next year? I think that would be really good then if maybe like Harry, Rihanna, fender 

not a bad shout

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...