Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

All Points East 2023


gfa

Recommended Posts

32 minutes ago, thewayiam said:

Let's have the YYYs sub.

So APE are the only festival wanting them again. 

That 2019 lineup is going to take some beating. Excited to see who they book as the undercard!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, thewayiam said:

So APE are the only festival wanting them again. 

strokes are reputed to be expensive, so a bigger financial risk for a promoter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, pryce said:

Strokes, Qotsa, Yeah Yeah Yeahs, The Walkmen all on a day

 

i still dont believe Qotsa are big enough to headline a day

 

do it, book it 

1. QOTSA did Finsbury just a few years ago

2. Strokes are expensive already and sold it well last time, they don't need QOTSA subbing

3. if they got QOTSA and Strokes, there would be no money for any form of undercard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, thewayiam said:

Well one day of it anyway. That was the time APE interested me 

Can't really expect all of them to interest you given its basically 6 day festivals. They always have a day or two i'm interested in (at like £40)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/22/2022 at 3:08 PM, mike46 said:

I believe The Strokes are being announced in January 

this fest loves repeat bookings doesn't it. The Strokes day back in 2019 had a banger undercard but as me and many others have said, the sound was garbage. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, The Crimson King said:

That’s not true. Disclosure was the highest selling day they have had with no reduced tickets at nearly 50k. Field Day was not far behind also with no reductions.

maybe a couple of competitions but no more. 

Just meant on twickets etc

Got my disclosure ticket free from tinder (cheers tinder) but we got some extras off twitter for £40 a piece

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, zahidf said:

Well if LCD soundsystem are doing an August date in Dublin, could have strokes and LCD as two headliners on two days. Wonder if they'd have LCD headlining field day

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LCD at Field Day might not be a bad shout. At least paired with Fred Again. 
The only thing is that they have to react to the sales for the last couple of years showing that acts who attract a younger audience have been much more successful to them. 
I think we’ve seen that already with Stormzy, but suspect that’s not the end of it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, zahidf said:

Well if LCD soundsystem are doing an August date in Dublin, could have strokes and LCD as two headliners on two days. Wonder if they'd have LCD headlining field day

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LCD did well alone last time, not sure they need to be combined with Field Day which usually sells well alone. Could have said the same about chems though I guess as they sold it out before too.

LCD are far less dancey live too, everyone else they’ve had for it post covid eg bicep and chems have a proper light show

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/23/2022 at 10:57 AM, gfa said:

2. Strokes are expensive already and sold it well last time, they don't need QOTSA subbing

 

A bit too well given how crowded it was getting by the end.

If they were to do it again I'd like to think the sound won't be as bizarre, given it sounded better on the main stage the further away from it I got.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, zahidf said:

Well if LCD soundsystem are doing an August date in Dublin, could have strokes and LCD as two headliners on two days. Wonder if they'd have LCD headlining field day

 

Strokes/LCD sounds like a Meet Me In The Bathroom themed day.

Not that it's a bad thing given that book is really good. I haven't yet seen the documentary based on it that came out earlier this year. Although it does amuse me a key figure in getting that book made was Maggie Rogers, who was transcribing interviews as a uni student towards it and is now doing quite well for herself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, gfa said:

LCD did well alone last time, not sure they need to be combined with Field Day which usually sells well alone. Could have said the same about chems though I guess as they sold it out before too.

LCD are far less dancey live too, everyone else they’ve had for it post covid eg bicep and chems have a proper light show

Nick Cave also did well the first year he was booked, but not so much last year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, The Crimson King said:

Nick Cave also did well the first year he was booked, but not so much last year. 

Not sure what they’ve been up to other than APE but LCD did one european festival this year so you’d think theres a bit of pent up demand maybe?

Field Day have way better options than LCD and book indepently don’t they??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, gfa said:

Not sure what they’ve been up to other than APE but LCD did one european festival this year so you’d think theres a bit of pent up demand maybe?

Field Day have way better options than LCD and book indepently don’t they??

Agree Field Day have better options.
 

I think the booking teams are the same now. Chems and Kraftwerk in 22 were APE bookings at Field Day. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, The Crimson King said:

Agree Field Day have better options.
 

I think the booking teams are the same now. Chems and Kraftwerk in 22 were APE bookings at Field Day. 

Not sure but field day have had older acts in the past do it like Aphex

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, gfa said:

Not sure but field day have had older acts in the past do it like Aphex

God that Field Day was utterly immense, had some painful clashes though. Think they had King Gizz/Slowdive/RTJ and Aphex Twin at the same time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, snoochie1981 said:

I have just spotted that it’s mentioned on the Connect festival chain that LCD aren’t playing the UK until 2024. I wonder if that means it’s Stormzy, Strokes and FATM plus Field Day? 

That is a very good spot. 
I still think Lizzo is a good shout for this, but you might have it nailed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, snoochie1981 said:

I have just spotted that it’s mentioned on the Connect festival chain that LCD aren’t playing the UK until 2024. I wonder if that means it’s Stormzy, Strokes and FATM plus Field Day? 

edit, seen it. shame but they do need to come back with a new album before touring again imo.

Edited by scatteredscreens
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...