Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Football 2022/23


charlierc

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, efcfanwirral said:

This is it really, you can't actually rig football matches to ensure those bigger teams make the finals of the competitions, but you can pull the ladder up. 

Newcastle are doing it right, learning from our mistakes of course, but also using the money to buy the right players and not those with the big names, while investing in proper scouting etc. It's good to see.

Are you sure.

I've seen countless absolutely ridiculous decisions made by VAR, completely baffling and beyond comprehension.

Nearly always, if not actually always, in favour of the bigger teams.

The recent Rashford not offside because he wasn't affecting play was ludicrous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, lost said:

Elsewhere £500m by Chelsea in little over 6 months feels like football spending is starting another leg up. I'm not sure there is a level of owners above the ones we already have? The other leagues must be pulling their hair out.

I mean La Liga have been very quick to slag off the Premier League and they've been quick to oblige: La Liga director bemoans 'cheating' Premier League clubs after 'barbaric' winter spending (football365.com)

The fact Chelsea spent more than Ligue 1, Serie A, La Liga and Bundesliga clubs combined is bizarre, and feels like a bit of an extreme strategy, particularly given how much of this outlay has gone on players in their early 20's as essentially a high stakes bet on future potential, rather than necessarily addressing the fact they are over-reliant on full-backs Reece James and Ben Chilwell staying fit and can never seem to find a reliable striker.

Even for the Premier League and its cash rich way of living, spending over £500million in two windows is bananas and it is a surprise they think this can somehow be FFP compliant thanks to amortising the fuck out of it. Maybe it'll work, or maybe it'll be a high spending version of AC Milan, who tried this in 2017 and duly got a UEFA ban for breaking FFP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, charlierc said:

Even for the Premier League and its cash rich way of living, spending over £500million in two windows is bananas and it is a surprise they think this can somehow be FFP compliant thanks to amortising the fuck out of it. Maybe it'll work, or maybe it'll be a high spending version of AC Milan, who tried this in 2017 and duly got a UEFA ban for breaking FFP.

FFP doesn't apply to big PL clubs (see Man City)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Punksnotdead said:

Short of assassinating the Glazers, how could they have changed things? Thousands of us gave up our season tickets and never went back. Unfortunately, there were thousands more to take our place!

Nothing changed cos utd fans still supported glazer utd. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Skip997 said:

Are you sure.

I've seen countless absolutely ridiculous decisions made by VAR, completely baffling and beyond comprehension.

Nearly always, if not actually always, in favour of the bigger teams.

The recent Rashford not offside because he wasn't affecting play was ludicrous.

About 4 hours ago you said "I've stopped watching football"?????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Punksnotdead said:

About 4 hours ago you said "I've stopped watching football"?????

I have, BUT only very recently and unfortunately I'm yet to manage to stop following it.

Hopefully that will be next, as I'm sick to death of the way it's going, become effectively pointless at the top level.

It's a struggle binning off a 50 year old addiction, but I must try as it's badly affecting my mental health.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Skip997 said:

Genuinely don't understand that point, I thought it was brought in for the opposite, i.e. make more competition.

Nothing happens without the ok of the teams at the top. How would it increase competition? It means squads who already had an advantage would keep the advantage and others couldn’t close the gap. It effectively protected the establishment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really impossible/difficult situation the Mason Greenwood one. On the one hand, he has not been charged/found guilty of any offence so we should be going by innocent until proven guilty, but given the nature of the alleged crimes and the fact that audio/pictures have been seen in relation to it, Man Utd can't really let him play for the club again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, hodgey123 said:

Really impossible/difficult situation the Mason Greenwood one. On the one hand, he has not been charged/found guilty of any offence so we should be going by innocent until proven guilty, but given the nature of the alleged crimes and the fact that audio/pictures have been seen in relation to it, Man Utd can't really let him play for the club again.

When they talk about key witnesses withdrawing from a millionaire footballer prosecution. I suspect many of will have suspicions about what caused those witnesses to withdraw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, pink_triangle said:

When they talk about key witnesses withdrawing from a millionaire footballer prosecution. I suspect many of will have suspicions about what caused those witnesses to withdraw.

His girlfriend has continued to follow him on social media throughout and I remember the particularly distasteful reaction from her dad shortly after all of the allegations came out which absolutely reeked off a man desperate to keep the gravy train going. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, hodgey123 said:

Really impossible/difficult situation the Mason Greenwood one. On the one hand, he has not been charged/found guilty of any offence so we should be going by innocent until proven guilty, but given the nature of the alleged crimes and the fact that audio/pictures have been seen in relation to it, Man Utd can't really let him play for the club again.

plenty of people have been cancelled for much less.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/1/2023 at 8:00 PM, Skip997 said:

I have, BUT only very recently and unfortunately I'm yet to manage to stop following it.

Hopefully that will be next, as I'm sick to death of the way it's going, become effectively pointless at the top level.

It's a struggle binning off a 50 year old addiction, but I must try as it's badly affecting my mental health.

I'm sure you will be back in love with it, once liverpool start winning again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, hodgey123 said:

Really impossible/difficult situation the Mason Greenwood one. On the one hand, he has not been charged/found guilty of any offence so we should be going by innocent until proven guilty, but given the nature of the alleged crimes and the fact that audio/pictures have been seen in relation to it, Man Utd can't really let him play for the club again.

I assume Utd will either terminate the contract or let him rot on the sidelines until the contract runs out. Given the audio of what he did is out there, i dont really see a way back for him in the UK ( rightly). Saying that, im sure some scummy League 1/2 club may give him a chance

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, zahidf said:

I assume Utd will either terminate the contract or let him rot on the sidelines until the contract runs out. Given the audio of what he did is out there, i dont really see a way back for him in the UK ( rightly). Saying that, im sure some scummy League 1/2 club may give him a chance

 

 

I had a bet with two of my mates of £100 each that he would not appear in the PL again. Yesterday's news makes it a lot more likely that it will happen, but it'll be a brave club that takes the punt. I also fully believe if this was McTominay or any other lesser talented player at United then the contract would probably have been terminated quite soon after the news broke, but Greenwood is a £100M+ asset.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, hodgey123 said:

I had a bet with two of my mates of £100 each that he would not appear in the PL again. Yesterday's news makes it a lot more likely that it will happen, but it'll be a brave club that takes the punt. I also fully believe if this was McTominay or any other lesser talented player at United then the contract would probably have been terminated quite soon after the news broke, but Greenwood is a £100M+ asset.

He was a 100m asset, but i dont really see any club of championship level or above taking on that headache. ( and there will be a headache, even though charges arent being pressed, theres audio out there with what happened)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, zahidf said:

He was a 100m asset, but i dont really see any club of championship level or above taking on that headache. ( and there will be a headache, even though charges arent being pressed, theres audio out there with what happened)

someone took on the player accused of rape (i forget his name). clubs want good player, if it takes something like this for that good player to be available, a club will take him on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Neil said:

someone took on the player accused of rape (i forget his name). clubs want good player, if it takes something like this for that good player to be available, a club will take him on.

Do you mean Ched Evans? He had to go below his natural level from memory, however then worked up. I think Sunderland kept playing Adam Johnson until he pleaded guilty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, pink_triangle said:

Do you mean Ched Evans?

yeah, that was the geezer.

 

40 minutes ago, pink_triangle said:

He had to go below his natural level

a club spotted a bargain.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, hodgey123 said:

Really impossible/difficult situation the Mason Greenwood one. On the one hand, he has not been charged/found guilty of any offence so we should be going by innocent until proven guilty, but given the nature of the alleged crimes and the fact that audio/pictures have been seen in relation to it, Man Utd can't really let him play for the club again.

If I'm honest I thought Manchester United had actually cancelled his contract in the wake of the original photos/videos the girl shared on Instagram rather than actually suspended him.

A few have shared this opinion, including fans I know of Man United, but I do think that if I was a Man United fan, I would be deeply uncomfortable at the idea of him playing for the club again. Same goes if a club I follow was trying to sign him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The other thing is that the standard of proof for these internal investigations/another club exploring the possibility of signing Greenwood is a lot lower than the CPS need for a prosecution. The only proof really needed is that he was on the audio recording and then that should be that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, hodgey123 said:

The other thing is that the standard of proof for these internal investigations/another club exploring the possibility of signing Greenwood is a lot lower than the CPS need for a prosecution. The only proof really needed is that he was on the audio recording and then that should be that.

I would refuse to go if he signed for my team, I think many would feel the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
    • We had a really good weekend this year. This was our 2nd year after giving it a go last year with 3 year old twins (we do Glasto but don't take the kids and have no plans to in the distant future!!).   Highlights of the weekend for me was Peter Hook & the Light, English Teacher, Flaming Lips, Adult DVD and Alex James (I get the karaoke thing but I still thought it was great). Missed loads of acts we wanted to see due to having two kids in tow but overall we left happy with what we managed to see across the weekend. Some great food vendors, good to see Steak Frites make an appearance this year, one of my faves from Glasto. Festival is really well run, toilets remained clean and stocked with loo roll all weekend, even on Sunday night/Monday morning. The walk from the cars is a ballache but it is what it is, arriving Thursday evening meant we were parked as far away as you could be.   My only gripe is that there seems to be a trend of parents letting their teenagers camp completely separately to them in family camping. We had a large group of 15-17 year olds near us who came home pissed up every evening at 3-4am being really loud and annoying! I get that it's a festival etc but I think it's taking the piss a bit letting your kids camp separately and disrupt everyone else.   All in all we had a really good time and are looking forward to next year.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...