Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, JoeyT said:

Number of deaths obviously a concern and upsetting.

Positive case numbers though... WOW.

yep of course .... thats going to take a while longer to filter through ... but cases getting so low I thought it was a mistake .... shows what they could have done without delaying it !!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This happens every few weeks, testing numbers drop and cases drop. Cases numbers are declining but it’s likely to be the drop in testing that has generated this size of decline. It’s the same when we saw large numbers of cases too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The question is has testing dropped because capacity is overwhelmed or because less people are asking for a test?

 

If it’s the latter then there’s likely to be a genuine improvement. But tbh, we’ve been in lockdown for nearly 3 weeks. I’d be amazed if the numbers weren’t dropping. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Fuzzy Afro said:

The question is has testing dropped because capacity is overwhelmed or because less people are asking for a test?

 

If it’s the latter then there’s likely to be a genuine improvement. But tbh, we’ve been in lockdown for nearly 3 weeks. I’d be amazed if the numbers weren’t dropping. 

What makes you think 'lockdown' has any significant effect on the number of 'cases'?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, JoeyT said:

Number of deaths obviously a concern and upsetting.

Positive case numbers though... WOW.

Exactly the right tone to take, it's good news to see the cases dropping like this but it's also a saddening reminder of how locking down a few weeks earlier could have made such a difference 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Fuzzy Afro said:

The question is has testing dropped because capacity is overwhelmed or because less people are asking for a test?

 

If it’s the latter then there’s likely to be a genuine improvement. But tbh, we’ve been in lockdown for nearly 3 weeks. I’d be amazed if the numbers weren’t dropping. 

I would hope with testing increased and cases dropping we shouldn't be in that position again .... maybe a reporting error but that normally means delays in publishing the data .... we had a decent drop yesterday im hoping this is a continuation 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t think it’s a surprise when testing numbers drop by circa 60k that cases will also see a decline too. As we’ve said for a while don’t take an individual day at face value, wait and see if this is the trend or an outlier. Just like we did for the day that we had 33k cases. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, crazyfool1 said:

Should we shut schools 1 week earlier for Christmas ? my thoughts .... but numbers are starting to cause major issues now 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-55057125

Chaos at my kid's school, they're all in a state of panic trying to cram what might be in GCSE into kids heads when they don't know if exams will actually go ahead or if they do in what form. They're not really doing much useful learning. Plus, loads of kids and teachers still having to stay home because of covid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, crazyfool1 said:

Should we shut schools 1 week earlier for Christmas ? my thoughts .... but numbers are starting to cause major issues now 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-55057125

They were due to break up on the Wednesday in Stockport, but all schools are shutting on the Friday, with "home schooling" Monday and Tuesday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, steviewevie said:

Chaos at my kid's school, they're all in a state of panic trying to cram what might be in GCSE into kids heads when they don't know if exams will actually go ahead or if they do in what form. They're not really doing much useful learning. Plus, loads of kids and teachers still having to stay home because of covid.

its a disaster .... that extra week at Christmas might allow for a reset somewhat .... I know @vintagelaureate has loads of bubbles out and several teachers and a headteacher .... this could also make things a little safer for the visits (of some to Grandparents ) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, stuartbert two hats said:

They were due to break up on the Wednesday in Stockport, but all schools are shutting on the Friday, with "home schooling" Monday and Tuesday.

that makes total sense to me ... never did any work then anyway ... :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...