Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Sziget 2020


jj200

Recommended Posts

24 minutes ago, swelsbyuk said:

Did any of you do Sziget Prime last year, or know someone who did? If so, how did you get the freebies? Were they posted to you or did you have to collect them at the festival? Thanks.

I was a Szitizen Prime. If you didn't get the package via mail, then you had to go on the Island somewhere at the NGO Island area to get your stuff. However, maybe they still have some and they can try to send to you again via mail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, #1SzigetFan said:

I was a Szitizen Prime. If you didn't get the package via mail, then you had to go on the Island somewhere at the NGO Island area to get your stuff. However, maybe they still have some and they can try to send to you again via mail.

Thanks. I was just thinking of doing it for next year, I didn't do it this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WreckinBar said:

What would people think about a line up like this? placements might be a bit odd but i think something like this is plausible

Picture1.png

I think Billie Eilish could headline, at Sziget even the sub plays 90 minutes so if they want her she'll make it happen, maybe with guests? She's too big to even headline A38.

I would love a Biffy Clyro - Kasabian - Foals day!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, WreckinBar said:

What would people think about a line up like this? placements might be a bit odd but i think something like this is plausible

Picture1.png

Undercard is good but heads are extremely weak in comparison with 2019.
One of Foals / Stormzy / Kasabian trio is definetely possible, but I don't think Sziget will risk and make three days with British-oriented headliners. 
Also they could promote Billie Eilish as headliner but will probably put her before the last main stage act of the day like Macklemore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that headline lacks a massive act, Green Day are big but nothing on Foos/Ed Sheeran and all the other headliners are on the smaller side. Its also wayyy too British I think. Flume should headline the tent they need the night time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, WreckinBar said:

What would people think about a line up like this? placements might be a bit odd but i think something like this is plausible

Picture1.png

No way Flume third down, he will touring next year I think and he's a contender for a closing spot (or subhead) almost everywhere imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Green Day announcing a tour later today with Fall Out Boy and Weezer. Be interesting to see the dates and if it comes to Europe or not - we could get all three?

Off topic, but is Tame Impala a big act in Europe? I see them mentioned quite a lot on here as a potential headliner and always think WTF? I find them quite boring and most of my friends in the UK haven't got a clue who they are.

Edited by swelsbyuk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, swelsbyuk said:

Green Day announcing a tour later today with Fall Out Boy and Weezer. Be interesting to see the dates and if it comes to Europe or not - we could get all three?

Off topic, but is Tame Impala a big act in Europe? I see them mentioned quite a lot on here as a potential headliner and always think WTF? I find them quite boring and most of my friends in the UK haven't got a clue who they are.

For what concern GD, I reckon it should be a stadium tour - that would kick them all out of the window. Or am I wrong?

 

IMO, Tame Impala is an act the size of The National: not properly pure headliner material, but it lends itself well to the duty - what I mean is that a festival opts for a strong undercard orientation, or it is not a major one, or simply looks for a relatively-cheap (but efficient in terms of critical acclaim) name, Tame Impala pops up.

For what concerns them being boring, I suggest you to stop spotify and go watching their set at Glasto this year: I was not impressed when I saw them live at MC '18 (both because they played in daylight/sunset, both because I was waiting for Pearl Jam on the other stage), but with their right setting they are just mindblowing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, swelsbyuk said:

Green Day announcing a tour later today with Fall Out Boy and Weezer. Be interesting to see the dates and if it comes to Europe or not - we could get all three?

Off topic, but is Tame Impala a big act in Europe? I see them mentioned quite a lot on here as a potential headliner and always think WTF? I find them quite boring and most of my friends in the UK haven't got a clue who they are.

Tame has been a big topic in the reading thread as to whether they are big enough to headline there and it seems very split. I think they could at Sziget as they are certainly bigger for the general audience there than The National and they are also on the way up. Definitely would have to play at night as their set is very focused on the lights and stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, swelsbyuk said:

When does Sziget normally make its first announcement? Looking back at last year, Ed was announced in September but I get the feeling it's normally later than that. Any clues?

This is how it was in recent years:
- for 2016: prime tickets 24.11.2015, first announcement 03.12.2015
- for 2017: prime tickets 25.09.2016, first announcement 15.12.2016
- for 2018: prime tickets 08.11.2017, first announcement 22.01.2018
- for 2019: first announcement 20.09.2018, prime tickets 01.10.2018 

I'd say this year they announced Ed Sheeran so early because he announced all of his tour dates simultaneously. Due to that Sziget also needed to start ticket sales earlier. Expecting first bandwave in December.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OllieR said:

Who do people think will headline the a38 stage?

Apparently that is not a defined status any more, since 2018 and 2019 editions put some weird names in that spot (Anna of the North, Black Mountain / Khruangin against Idles, Lemaitre): although usually the biggest non-electronic names are playing at 23.45 slot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...