Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Football 2015/16


TheGayTent

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, kaosmark2 said:

16th-19th in the table covering most of the big spending teams, very little business at the top end of the league.

Clearly Chelsea are also worried about the drop as well :P

Finding it harder to judge who'll go down now. A lot depends on how many of these new signings hit the ground running. Villa are completely gone but 2 from 5 with no team looking a cert either way. Personally I'm going to guess Swansea and Bournemouth but really not got much clue.

The two smallest clubs in the league...

If Swansea win tonight (not an easy feat away to a Pulis side) then we'd go 14th on 28 points, I'd fancy us to get 12 points from our remaining games from there.

Looking at Sunderland's fixtures coming up, it really is do or die time for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 6.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

41 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

Sam's picked them up a bit, hasn't he? :unsure:

 

16 points from his 15 games. 

He has another 15 games left - same again, gets them to 35 points.

Were that to happen, realistically Swansea and Bournemouth would need only 3 wins to finish above Sunderland. 

Assuming Swansea and Bournemoutb are capable of 3 wins from 15 games that would leave a 3 way fight between Sunderland, Newcastle, and Norwich for one place. 

Lots of assumptions there of course...

Edited by TheGayTent
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, kaosmark2 said:

We have one of the lowest shots attempted and chances created in the league. He's not had good scoring chances consistently.

I think Mitrovic pushing the boundaries of hold-up play into fouling in the first 5-8 games is counting against him to a degree. I feel he's definitely worth persisting with as a player, if he can add goals to his game and become a 1 in 3 striker he could be great for us for years.

Doumbia is a really exciting signing, at least for anyone who's played lots of FIFA/Football Manager!

I'd stick by him for sure. If we stay up it'll be interesting to see how he gets on in his second season in the prem. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
Just now, jackarmy said:

I'll be watching Leicester's next two fixtures with interest, away to City and Arsenal. If they can get 2 points or more from those games they'll have done very, very well indeed. 

they will - particularly as Leicester just aren't a very good team despite where they sit.

That's not me saying they don't deserve to be there tho. They clearly do.

Arsenal are in a bit of a mini slump at the mo, but I'm confident they'll pick up soon and steam on.

And it'll be interesting to see how City go now. Will the players want to send Pelli out on a high, or will their thinking have moved on to next season?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Arsenal don't win the league this season, then I cannot see them winning the league ever again under Wenger. Everything is in their favour and yet they still don't look like Champions. 

I'm starting to worry it's Tottenham that will win it - they're easily the best team I've seen this season and are within striking distance. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
2 minutes ago, TheGayTent said:

If Arsenal don't win the league this season, then I cannot see them winning the league ever again under Wenger. Everything is in their favour and yet they still don't look like Champions. 

I'm starting to worry it's Tottenham that will win it - they're easily the best team I've seen this season and are within striking distance. 

I'm not sure tottingham's current hot streak is going to keep going at the same rate - tho defo can't see them dropping out of the top 4. Teams tend to come and go a bit over the season, and I reckon they're about ready for cooler streak.

And similarly, I reckon Arsenal are about due to pick it up again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

I'm not sure tottingham's current hot streak is going to keep going at the same rate - tho defo can't see them dropping out of the top 4. Teams tend to come and go a bit over the season, and I reckon they're about ready for cooler streak.

And similarly, I reckon Arsenal are about due to pick it up again.

Arsenal have the same failings they've had for years. 

Tottenham have lost less games than Arsenal, scored more goals than Arsenal, and conceded less goals than Arsenal. 

The only thing that stops Tottenham for me is an injury to Kane as they haven't really got a replacement. 

Edited by TheGayTent
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

I'm not sure tottingham's current hot streak is going to keep going at the same rate - tho defo can't see them dropping out of the top 4. Teams tend to come and go a bit over the season, and I reckon they're about ready for cooler streak.

And similarly, I reckon Arsenal are about due to pick it up again.

Are spurs in a hot streak? For me they have been the most consistent team this season.  Which is amazing as I keep expecting spurs to do a spurs!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, TheGayTent said:

If Arsenal don't win the league this season, then I cannot see them winning the league ever again under Wenger. Everything is in their favour and yet they still don't look like Champions. 

I'm starting to worry it's Tottenham that will win it - they're easily the best team I've seen this season and are within striking distance. 

They are getting through the easy home games ok, but most games seem to be a battle.  Southampton at home isnt an easy game, but its kind of game you probably have to find a way to win if your going to win the league.  If they had an Aguero level striker I think they would be running away with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, pink_triangle said:

Are spurs in a hot streak? For me they have been the most consistent team this season.  Which is amazing as I keep expecting spurs to do a spurs!

You could argue they're on a bad streak. They went almost 4 months this season without losing. Since then, they've lost twice in 2 months. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, pink_triangle said:

They are getting through the easy home games ok, but most games seem to be a battle.  Southampton at home isnt an easy game, but its kind of game you probably have to find a way to win if your going to win the league.  If they had an Aguero level striker I think they would be running away with it.

I think under normal circumstances they need a centre half, a central midfielder, and a striker (with at least one being a real leader). 

However, i agree it might be possible for them to win it just with a top quality striker. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
16 minutes ago, TheGayTent said:

Arsenal have the same failings they've had for years. 

Not quite the same.

For a start, this year they didnb't start shit and have to spend the rest of the season playing catch up, where by the fact of playing catch-up they could never make the top spot.

This time they're poised to strike for it - tho that doesn't mean they'll nessaarily succeed.

But the last part of the season haws been their strongest part i recent years, so if that's what happens this time they should be a shoe-in.

 

16 minutes ago, TheGayTent said:

Tottenham have lost less games than Arsenal, scored more goals than Arsenal, and conceded less goals than Arsenal. 

The only thing that stops Tottenham for me is an injury to Kane as they haven't really got a replacement. 

Kane has already dropped out of form once this season, so it might happen again.

And also, nothing of that references what Arsenal might do ... and as I've said above, there's good reason to think they'll be strong over the remaining weeks..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • In August 2009, in his Spectator blog he wrote about Harriet Harman, deputy leader of the Labour Party, in unflattering terms. Liddle began the article by asking: "So — Harriet Harman, then. Would you? I mean after a few beers obviously, not while you were sober."[27] Tanya Gold wrote in The Guardian that Liddle had delivered a "tissue-thin polemic." Pointing out that it was The Spectator's cover story that week.[28] Rachel Cooke in The Observer nearly two months later recalled finding Liddle's piece "disgusting"[29] Cooke went on to say: "I would still like to do something really unpleasant to the man who wrote [the article]." Liddle said two months later that the Harman column "was supposed to be a parody of guttural, base sexism", a joke he assumed readers would understand. After the negative response from Gold (and then Cooke, among other female journalists) he continued: "And then I suppose I came to the conclusion – gradually – that I must have got it wrong."[30] In June 2014, he said that of those he had offended, Harman was the one person to whom he would apologise.[31] In November 2009, again for The Spectator website, he offered "a quick update on what the Muslim savages are up to," a brief article about the stoning to death of a 20-year-old woman in Somalia after she was accused of adultery, and the similar death of a 13-year-old the year before. He made remarks, considered sarcastic, that read: "Incidentally, many Somalis have come to Britain as immigrants recently, where they are widely admired for their strong work ethic, respect for the law and keen, piercing, intelligence."[32][33] In December 2009, on his Spectator blog, Liddle referred to two black music producers, Brandon Jolie and Kingsley Ogundele, who had plotted to kill Jolie's 15-year-old pregnant girlfriend, as "human filth" and said the incident was not an anomaly. He continued: When he was accused of racism, Liddle said he was instead engaging in a debate about multiculturalism.[35][36] In March 2010 the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) upheld a complaint against Liddle, who became the first journalist to be censured over the contents of a blog, because he had not been able to prove his claim about the crime statistics.[37] After the publication of London crime figures in June 2010, The Sunday Telegraph suggested Liddle was largely right on some of his claims, but that he was probably wrong on his claims about knife crimes and violent sex crimes.[38] In October 2010, Liddle called for the abolition of the Welsh language TV channel S4C as a result of the 2010 Comprehensive Spending Review. In his article for The Spectator, he described Welsh nationalists as "miserable, seaweed munching, sheep-bothering pinch-faced hill-tribes".[39] On 23 May 2013, Liddle wrote about the murder of soldier Lee Rigby near the Royal Artillery Barracks in Woolwich, London. In the original version of a blog article for The Spectator, he referred to the perpetrators as "two black savages".[40] After many objections to his language use,[41] this phrase was modified.[42] Liddle apologised.[40][43] Giving a speech at Durham University in December 2021, Liddle said: "It is fairly easily proven that colonialism is not remotely the major cause of Africa's problems, just as it is very easy to prove that the educational underachievement of British people of Caribbean descent or African Americans is nothing to do with institutional or structural racism."[44] Independent editor rumour and Millwall supporters' website The Guardian reported on 8 January 2010 that the expected purchase of The Independent by Alexander Lebedev, a Russian billionaire, would be followed by the appointment of Liddle as editor.[45] Roy Greenslade wrote on 11 January that the reports were provoking a "major internal and external revolt" by The Independent's staff and readers.[46] The stories about Liddle's posts on Millwall Online apparently further reduced the likelihood of his being offered the job.[47] Finally, on 19 February, Stephen Brook of The Guardian reported that Liddle was no longer in the running for the post.[48] Tim Luckhurst, professor of journalism at the University of Kent, argued that Liddle's prospects of editing The Independent were nullified "by the people behind a viciously intolerant campaign of liberal bigotry".[49] In January 2010, the press drew attention to allegedly racist and misogynist comments posted under the username "monkeymfc"—a name Liddle has used—on Millwall Online, a fan club web forum with no official connection to Millwall Football Club. Liddle attributed some of the comments to opposition fans logging in under his name to embarrass him. He later said he had written some of the posts that were being criticised, including one in support of the BNP excluding Black and Asian people from the party.[50] Another post, in which he joked about not being able to smoke at Auschwitz,[51] led to his being asked to explain what he meant in The Jewish Chronicle.[47] While he said in June 2014 that his comments were taken out of context, he said that he did not regret making them. "No. Never. Absolutely not. I thought about my mates at Millwall Online, God I respect them so much more than these other people, these ghastly f**king people."[31] Stephen Lawrence, disabled and transgender people In November 2011, an article by Liddle for The Spectator suggested the trial of two men accused (and later convicted) of murdering Stephen Lawrence would not be fair.[52] It was referred to the Attorney General Dominic Grieve by the judge for possible contempt of court,[53] and he ordered the jurors not to read it. Having decided that it might have breached a court order, Grieve passed the case on to the Crown Prosecution Service and the Director of Public Prosecutions.[54] The decision that The Spectator was to be prosecuted by the CPS for breaching reporting restrictions was announced on 9 May 2012, with a court hearing scheduled for 7 June, although Liddle as the author was not himself liable for prosecution. Fraser Nelson, the magazine's editor, announced that the prosecution would not be contested,[55] and the magazine pleaded guilty at the hearing. The fine was £3,000, plus £2,000 compensation to Stephen Lawrence's parents and £625 costs.[56] In January 2012, Liddle wrote that many people in the UK were "pretending to be disabled" in his column for The Sun,[57] an opinion defended by James Delingpole.[58] Frances Ryan in The Guardian accused him of "belittling something that on a daily basis affects real people" who can be "a huge benefit to society. Maybe for a month Liddle would like to try that."[59] In May 2015, the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) upheld a complaint from Trans Media Watch that Liddle had been discriminatory towards Emily Brothers, a blind and transgender Labour candidate at the 2015 general election, in two Sun columns published in December 2014 and January 2015. In commenting in the way he had Liddle had breached two sections of the editors' code.[60][61] Column on poppers and gay sex During a parliamentary debate on the Psychoactive Substances Bill – which "makes it an offence to produce, supply, offer to supply, possess with intent to supply, possess on custodial premises, import or export psychoactive substances"[65] the Conservative politician Crispin Blunt admitted he used poppers: Liddle responded in his Spectator blog: The satirical and current affairs magazine Private Eye described this as hypocritical, pointing out Liddle's account in The Sunday Times of using Viagra in July 2004.[68][69] A spokesperson from the LGBT rights charity Stonewall said of Liddle's remarks: "Comments like this are shocking and damaging, but we wouldn't expect anything less from repeat offending bigots like Rod Liddle."[70] Column on Muslim voters In October 2019, Liddle penned a column in The Spectator commenting on the forthcoming December 2019 UK general election, which suggested that the election should be held on a Muslim holy day to reduce the Labour vote. The column was criticised by senior political figures including Chancellor of the Exchequer Sajid Javid and former Conservative Deputy Prime Minister David Lidington. Liddle defended the content as being humorous. The article also criticised the Labour MP Rosie Duffield's recent speech about her experience of trying to exit an abusive relationship; Duffield described the article as "racist and misogynistic".[74]
    • A true social democrat
    • I thought the same thing I thought when Baresi went which is there sure is a hell of alot of people who don't make the new pension age.
    • 1, The Menzingers- Everything I Ever Saw 2, Quicksand- Bring On The Psychics 3, Radkey- Bedroom Sand  
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...