Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Football 2015/16


TheGayTent

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 6.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

From football 365

We may never know, but there is no doubt that FSG would not be pulling the plug so soon after choosing to keep the faith unless they were convinced things were going backwards. Since the end of March, Liverpool have won six competitive matches in 90 minutes. Those beaten sides in full: Blackburn, Newcastle, QPR, Stoke, Bournemouth and Aston Villa.

It is Liverpool’s away form that has provided the most consternation. The away draw at Goodison made it one win in ten away games. Since March 16 they have taken seven points from nine away league games. As Dave Tindall wrote here,  his record away from home at the top four plus Everton reads as follows: Played 18, Won 1, Drawn 9, Lost 8, For 21, Against 33. Simply not good enough'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ian Wrights views about the Liverpool manager

"“When I think of Klopp, I think of that bad season that Dortmund had after the Champions League final, I thought the motivation wasn’t there, Liverpool don’t need that.

“They need a manager who has a track record to be able to stabilise the club, get Liverpool back on the front foot where they should be.”


I think Ian Wright is (as usual) talking crap. Ancelotti is used to having the best squads and budgets to match. He wont get that at liverpool

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think it was Rodgers who forced the Suarez move I think that was the management themselves.. Just thinking about money over the club. Although it was Rodgers who brought in the players and made the decisions who to play etc. He just had to go that's for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think it was Rodgers who forced the Suarez move I think that was the management themselves.. Just thinking about money over the club. Although it was Rodgers who brought in the players and made the decisions who to play etc. He just had to go that's for sure.

 

Of course it was not Rodgers! :rolleyes:

 

It was Suarez wanting the move and the club wanting the money

 

As for who buys the players at LFC thats still up for debate. One thing's for sure, Rodgers is in no way 100% culpable for the players who were bought. He had to contend with they multiman panel bollox, that they would probably want to do away with if they do want to catch a relatively big fish as the next manager

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course it was not Rodgers! :rolleyes:

 

It was Suarez wanting the move and the club wanting the money

 

As for who buys the players at LFC thats still up for debate. One thing's for sure, Rodgers is in no way 100% culpable for the players who were bought. He had to contend with they multiman panel bollox, that they would probably want to do away with if they do want to catch a relatively big fish as the next manager

 

Well the incident at the World Cup was obviously on purpose because Liverpool did say if he did bite anyone else or do something like that he would be gone. I feel like Suarez knew at the time that it was his only way out due to his contract aswell, I'm interested to see who gets replaced for Rodgers. Personally I hope its Klopp, I think it was the right time to sack him tho because if we waited anymore PL games or until December we could be miles away from Top 4 but right now we're 3 points away so its just a matter of when this new manager can get settled and hopefully do something good for us because lets be honest... no "top club" AT ALL is doing well this season so its the perfect time to turn it around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's been said on here, Liverpool fans need to start being realistic with there lot nowadays.

Also will be interesting if Liverpool give klopp time to put his stamp on the club. He didn't start getting success until his 3rd season at Dortmund.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we could be miles away from Top 4 but right now we're 3 points away so its just a matter of when this new manager can get settled

Liverpool fans moulding into Rodgers even though he has gone. 3 points from top 4 but only 4 points from bottom 4.

Like I told Neil the other day, Liverpool will be in the bottom 6 by end of October.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Liverpool fans moulding into Rodgers even though he has gone. 3 points from top 4 but only 4 points from bottom 4.

Like I told Neil the other day, Liverpool will be in the bottom 6 by end of October.

 

Well its always a give and take and it can be said for nearly all the clubs in the EPL right now and not just Liverpool, and being honest if all the other Top clubs wasn't performing badly id of said that top 4 isn't really possible specially since the manager needs to get settled but right now its just 50/50. When Rodgers first went and bought quite a lot of players ( can/markovic etc ) I said we wasn't going to get top 4 because he bought a lot of young players. But lets be honest.. top 4 or not regardless of what people say Rodgers was NOT good enough for the job even tactic wise was pretty terrible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Liverpool fans moulding into Rodgers even though he has gone. 3 points from top 4 but only 4 points from bottom 4.

Like I told Neil the other day, Liverpool will be in the bottom 6 by end of October.

They might not. They do have the luxury of playing relegation fodder on Halloween....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well its always a give and take and it can be said for nearly all the clubs in the EPL right now and not just Liverpool, and being honest if all the other Top clubs wasn't performing badly id of said that top 4 isn't really possible specially since the manager needs to get settled but right now its just 50/50. When Rodgers first went and bought quite a lot of players ( can/markovic etc ) I said we wasn't going to get top 4 because he bought a lot of young players. But lets be honest.. top 4 or not regardless of what people say Rodgers was NOT good enough for the job even tactic wise was pretty terrible.

He was good enough for a team that will finish generally 5th or 6th most seasons.

Liverpool in the last 25 years have been mediocre, the odd 2nd place one every 4 or 5 years.

What's going to change?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was good enough for a team that will finish generally 5th or 6th most seasons.

Liverpool in the last 25 years have been mediocre, the odd 2nd place one every 4 or 5 years.

What's going to change?

 

Well 1 example will be the way the team was set up and who was actually on the pitch for certain games, lets look at balotelli for example he wasn't the best of signings lets be honest BUT he was ALWAYS played on his own when we had other strikers to back him up. We have a decent striker selection but they constantly got played alone and not with another striker. And as I've mentioned recently the likes of lovren/allen just shouldn't really be on the team selection either. Crucial points was lost due to team selections from the MANAGER I'm not saying we was always top 4 material but lots of games was lost/drawn when they shouldn't of been.

Edited by Chris Lfc
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

As for who buys the players at LFC thats still up for debate. One thing's for sure, Rodgers is in no way 100% culpable for the players who were bought. He had to contend with they multiman panel bollox, that they would probably want to do away with if they do want to catch a relatively big fish as the next manager

 

Many relatively big managers aren't in charge of transfers overseas.  The transfer committee in itself isn't a bad concept, there is an advantage in separating transfers and coaching as it allows a longer term plan and you don't have to rip up the squad every time you change manager.  Liverpools transfer committee hasn't worked well, but that doesnt mean the model cant succeed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was good enough for a team that will finish generally 5th or 6th most seasons.

Liverpool in the last 25 years have been mediocre, the odd 2nd place one every 4 or 5 years.

What's going to change?

Loads. Where were your shower before Whiskeydick showed up FFS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Like I told Neil the other day, Liverpool will be in the bottom 6 by end of October.

 

What was it that Nal was saying about the next 7 games being killers?  Two proved not to be, and the results were good enough for top 4. :lol:

 

Rodgers may or may not be any good, but what's on public view isn't dreadful as an average. If anything has killed him it's the out-of-sight promises he's given the board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • sub yes I could see but I don't think they get 1hr 15, a headliner starting at 18:15 though is unlikely. Even the recent co-headlines that have had like 1hr 15 then a 1hr 30 after were on 8pm or just before, you are trailing behind more than 1.5 hours then. In that scenario some 3rd down bands are only starting at 18:15 and some haven't lol. I agree they won't not book them due to this but it won't be 6 headliners. It would be 5 headliners and you wouldn't want to see 5 headliners booked but Biffy were to not be thouhgt of as an option for one. Wolf Alice on the other hand could sub no bother and you'd think nothing of it. I'm not so sure Biffy would get headline though after the festival choice in Kendal this year.
    • Definitely. UKIP also used Merkel welcoming 1 million Afgans to Europe in 2015 during the brexit vote.   Politicians in other countries within the EU know the are going to lose voters to parties to the right of them over stuff like this and they've no control over it.
    • I think it will very much vary on who there is to book who they know will sell out a day.    They’ve co-headline and full headline stuff in future, there no reason at all they won’t do it again, even if it means cutting someone’s set by 15 mins or having a band less in a big bands day…   They’re not going to not book Foo fighters and instead get the equivalent of Florence and C&S just to not have a band do a big set…   …unless of course they think it will make them more money…
    • Maybe some right wing leaders like Meloni are just playing to their base, like Reform have been here talking about them ending up at Calais.
    • Citizenship via investment programs basically work by saying if you invest this much in our economy (say buy a property worth x) then we will either grant you citizenship or residency with a route to it. The EU has rules on how low countries can set the bar. Montenegro was one of the easier ones to get and they've had to tighten it up.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...