Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Headliners 2016


thewayiam

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, russycarps said:

The teeny tiny difference is frank turner and emily eavis havent scornfully dismissed the festival for being too middle class.

 

But ... he is right, you know, about the festival.  He said it used to be interesting when it was a real alternative festival, but now it is just a mainstream middle class festival... and at £200+ a ticket, it is hard to argue against him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 15.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

7 minutes ago, mrf said:

So basically its ok as long as you dont have a negative opinion of Glastonbury?

Of course you could then turn your point around and say that people who went to even more expensive schools are approving of Glastonbury, therefore supporting his statement!

At the end of the day, linking someones  school to what they can and cannot say as an adult is stupid.

It's really quite simple.

If you look like this:

bruce_vvb.jpg

 

and say this:

Bruce Dickinson has vowed never to bring his band to Glastonbury Festival after dismissing it as “the most bourgeois thing on the planet”.

Then you're a daft c**t.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, russycarps said:

It's really quite simple.

If you look like this:

bruce_vvb.jpg

 

and say this:

Bruce Dickinson has vowed never to bring his band to Glastonbury Festival after dismissing it as “the most bourgeois thing on the planet”.

Then you're a daft c**t.

 

 

Well if he things GF is  “the most bourgeois thing on the planet”

Then he obviously has never actually opened his eyes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, russycarps said:

It's really quite simple.

If you look like this:

bruce_vvb.jpg

 

and say this:

Bruce Dickinson has vowed never to bring his band to Glastonbury Festival after dismissing it as “the most bourgeois thing on the planet”.

Then you're a daft c**t.

 

 

Fuck me, so now its anyone who wears a suit and has a high position in any company! What exactly should he be stood in front of if he is trying to start a company whos product is flying

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a close (and very lovely) friend from University that went to Oundle. He has a very polished accent but other than that is hard working and down to earth. 

I have other friends from very posh schools and many like me went to (not even very good) state schools. It doesn't define who you are or your entitlement to attend a festival. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Heather90 said:

I have a close (and very lovely) friend from University that went to Oundle. He has a very polished accent but other than that is hard working and down to earth. 

I have other friends from very posh schools and many like me went to (not even very good) state schools. It doesn't define who you are or your entitlement to attend a festival. 

does he refuse to play glastonbury on the grounds that it's the most bourgeois thing on the planet?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, russycarps said:

It's really quite simple.

If you look like this:

bruce_vvb.jpg

 

and say this:

Bruce Dickinson has vowed never to bring his band to Glastonbury Festival after dismissing it as “the most bourgeois thing on the planet”.

Then you're a daft c**t.

 

 

So now you're judging people on how they look? Sounds like pretty shaky ground to me. 

Let me ask you this: 

If, instead of wearing a suit, you look like this

image.jpg.8dee3268083ee13d14410285a38cca

and say the same thing, does that make a difference?

If your answer is yes, then you're the daft c**t. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, russycarps said:

does he refuse to play glastonbury on the grounds that it's the most bourgeois thing on the planet?

 

His full quote was this.

“Personally I have no interest in going to Glastonbury,” he told the Daily Star. “In the days when Glasto was an alternative festival it was quite interesting, but anywhere Gwyneth Paltrow goes and you can live in an air-conditioned yurt is not for me.”

Just accept that he doesnt like your festival, and has an opinion that is different to yours

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, mrf said:

Fuck me, so now its anyone who wears a suit and has a high position in any company! What exactly should he be stood in front of if he is trying to start a company whos product is flying

do you think not-for-profit glastonbury festival is more or less bourgeois than an aviation company?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, russycarps said:

do you think not-for-profit glastonbury festival is more or less bourgeois than an aviation company?

 

 

depends if you see flying people home who are in afghanistan and stranded in other countries to be bourgeois, but £600,000 of VIP superloos as acceptable

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mrf said:

depends if you see flying people home who are in afghanistan and stranded in other countries to be bourgeois, but £600,000 of VIP superloos as acceptable

On one side there's an aircraft maintenance, technical support and training services company. On the other a not-for-profit music festival.

Which one do you think sounds closer to the "most bourgeois thing on the planet"?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • There is a chance that Norton's reaction was very much like our reaction, because people in this country tend to think 'big = Glastonbury'.   Having said that, though, I'm fairly sure they've gone for her again this time, and it's broken down. Whether it's only just broken down or not, I'm not sure, but I'd air on the side of - they thought they had her, up to a certain point.
    • Yeah, I did wonder if they might be getting too big for Piece Hall now. Wet Leg did Castlefield this year and were subbing them at Tramlines. Wishful thinking! I'd happily see them do another outdoor headline in the north of England, wherever it might be (except R+L, which I'm def too old for now 😂)
    • You've certainly got a bunch of American acts who absolutely adore the festival and are willing to bring peanuts for it. You can never discount The Killers on that basis.
    • Law unto herself, Madge. But I think, for a certain generation, Hyde Park still has a touch of mystery and magic - that and Wembley Stadium.
    • I personally think Glasto big slots mean more to British artists that American ones don't (except Rodrigo, Killers, Foo Fighters) - in recent years anyway. The chance to pay (for a lot more money) to more of her own fans for 3 nights at BST must be more appealing to Madonna.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...