Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Football 2011-2012


Guest eFestivals

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 8.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • eFestivals

    1469

  • The Nal

    1095

  • kaosmark2

    1095

  • strummer77

    896

I'm wondering why they have chosen an image of Surez which looks like he's trying to pose in a swastika shape, but anyway yeah its amazing how badly everyone seems to have been advised on this, if it'd been brought forward immediately with a simple explanation and an apology for a cultural misunderstanding there'd be nothing more thought of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Paul McGrath: "As an ex-footballer having experienced racist comments throughout my career I was saddened to see Liverpool players wear those t-shirts last night. I would have been much happier if they had worn anti-racism t-shirts."

=

Edited by strummer77
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Have liverpool been linked with any strikers, was thinking before and nobody obvious comes to mind who is available and would make a huge impact. Agree spurs should hold off liverpool but I just have a funny feeling Arry will pull a really dumb move like ripping his midfield apart and buying lampard and building the team around him.

Liverpool are constantly being linked with strikers and midfielders in the papers - tho of course there might be nothing to any of that. Generally they're younger ones, which fits the Henry plan, but also means they're generally players that are off the radar of someone like me who doesn't take much of an interest in footie outside the UK.

As for 'Arry, yup - he'll be wanting to tinker cos that's what he does (plus he's got big bills from lawyers coming up and so he needs some extra wonga :P). Whether Levy will let him loose with the chequebook I don't know, but I reckon it's more likely right now than it's been in recent windows cos his eyes might be starting to glaze over with dreams of glory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

John Barnes reckons "ignorance is an excuse"…

http://www.bbc.co.uk...eyside-16309990

Not quite, but don't let that stop you believing that it says something it doesn't. You wouldn't want to go changing your habits now.

Barnes defended Suarez, saying: "As much as we will say ignorance is no excuse, ignorance is an excuse."

He said that "cultural differences have to be taken into consideration".

So please do tell me: if no one has ever told you that to use a certain word that you've been using all your life without issues is wrong, how you'd know it was wrong?

Those who have decided to take the high-level moralising don't have an answer to that real-life dilemma, which just goes to show that those who are taking the high-level moralising line do not have realistic thinking.

(that doesn't necessarily apply directly to Suarez of course, but it does expose something about some of the illogical thinking being applied to Suarez).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Which ones are they?

Haha, when did you ever have any respect for Fergie to lose?

It appears to have passed you by that I was mirroring the words my post was in reply to. :lol:

But to answer your question about Evra, I'm on about that Chelsea case where he was deemed to have exaggerated - which is essentially lying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

He clearly said what he said... Ignorance is an excuses... I don't think it should be...

So please do tell me: if no one has ever told you that to use a certain word that you've been using all your life without issues is wrong, how you'd know it was wrong?

I'm, guessing that you'll be using your omnipotence to know what you don't know and can't know? :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So please do tell me: if no one has ever told you that to use a certain word that you've been using all your life without issues is wrong, how you'd know it was wrong?

I'm, guessing that you'll be using your omnipotence to know what you don't know and can't know? :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As for 'Arry, yup - he'll be wanting to tinker cos that's what he does (plus he's got big bills from lawyers coming up and so he needs some extra wonga :P). Whether Levy will let him loose with the chequebook I don't know, but I reckon it's more likely right now than it's been in recent windows cos his eyes might be starting to glaze over with dreams of glory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

So, no one at LFC does racism awareness training for new signings?

I've no idea, but I'd be surprised if they or any other club does.

Things might perhaps have changed in the last few years, but no more than a few years ago it was standard for all clubs when signing an overseas player to have them sign on the dotted line and then point them at a hotel and leave them to it - they gave no support to them of any kind, they were expected to turn up for training and that's all.

Looks like Liverpool screwed up badly if that's the case... And the other premiereship clubs better start asap!

I would think that the result of the Suarez case will be for clubs to introduce appropriate 'educational training', which can only be a good thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

I forgot about Levy, my impression is that he is one of the best chief execs in the league, really keeps Arry from doing the stupid things he would naturally do.

hmmmm ... not sure about that. 'Arry's arrival coincided with Spurs starting to post losses instead of profits. I have a feeling that they might have returned to a small profit with their last accounts, but that included them being in the Chumps which of course brought them significant extra income.

But how much of the say about spending is Levy's anyway I don't know. He's just Joe Lewis's bagman really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Well it actually wasn't Evra. It was Mick Phelan, Gary Neville, Pique and Tevez (who cant speak English, granted). Evra never claimed to have heard anything. All he did was punch the groundsman.

utterly wrong - you can't be judged by the FA as having exaggerated only by throwing a punch.

I'm not entirely sure in which way he exaggerated, but that's how it was judged to be. I've just tried googling for it and failed cos it's now so lost behind the Suarez thing, but ralph has posted some of the words of that FA judgement into this thread recently at least twice (and I've failed to find those as well).

Edited by eFestivals
Link to comment
Share on other sites

utterly wrong - you can't be judged by the FA as having exaggerated only by throwing a punch.

I'm not entirely sure in which way he exaggerated, but that's how it was judged to be. I've just tried googling for it and failed cos it's now so lost behind the Suarez thing, but ralph has posted some of the words of that FA judgement into this thread recently at least twice (and I've failed to find those as well).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Ta.

From that....

17. We find Mr Evra's description exaggerated.

25. We find Mr Evra's account exaggerated and unreliable. It is an attempt to justify a physical intervention by him which cannot reasonably be justified.

(there might be other words against Evra within that, I merely searched for 'exaggerated').

So, there's the proof that Evra has a history of telling porkies to try and drop others from another club in the shit.

That of course might not have any relevance in the Suarez case, but then again it might do.

Edited by eFestivals
Link to comment
Share on other sites

utterly wrong - you can't be judged by the FA as having exaggerated only by throwing a punch.

I'm not entirely sure in which way he exaggerated, but that's how it was judged to be. I've just tried googling for it and failed cos it's now so lost behind the Suarez thing, but ralph has posted some of the words of that FA judgement into this thread recently at least twice (and I've failed to find those as well).

Edited by The Nal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...