Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2027 Headliners


Guest

Recommended Posts

33 minutes ago, fraybentos1 said:

Why are you assuming reading isnt the start of a new tour/ album?

 

I didnt assume there wouldn't be a new album

26 minutes ago, Ben7amin_ said:

Be nearly a year gap in live shows (I think)  by the time Fountains play Leeds/Reading  recon there is a fair chance that this will be in support of a new album. 

They've played constantly and absolutely everything else,what else can they do bar Reading?, either way they are getting them after everywhere else, dame for Charli, same for Chase and any new songs will be like two plus everything already from tour. You surely want fresh bands that have been around everywhere but the kebab shop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, northernangel said:

 

I didnt assume there wouldn't be a new album

They've played constantly and absolutely everything else,what else can they do bar Reading?, either way they are getting them after everywhere else, dame for Charli, same for Chase and any new songs will be like two plus everything already from tour. You surely want fresh bands that have been around everywhere but the kebab shop.

 

They played a pretty big (sub?) slot at R&L 2024, to be fair.

 

My guess is a new song will drop before it, maybe two - AM Do I Wanna Know before Glastonbury 2013 vibes, then the album drops a number of months later.

 

It's still all sooner than I expected, if it is indeed heading towards a new record. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think in this community where a lot of us do a lot of gigging and festivaling quite a lot while perusing every line up as they come out. Yes this might seem like bands who have been around a lot. But-   

 

For a lot of people Leeds & Reading is a coming of age right of passage -  a lot of the attendees will be young and it will be there first festival. -  they will care not if the acts that are playing have been around a lot recently -  It wont be on their radar one bit. 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Ben7amin_
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, mufcok said:

 

They played a pretty big (sub?) slot at R&L 2024, to be fair.

 

My guess is a new song will drop before it, maybe two - AM Do I Wanna Know before Glastonbury 2013 vibes, then the album drops a number of months later.

 

It's still all sooner than I expected, if it is indeed heading towards a new record. 

 

They were 4th down at Reading in 2024, Lana, Fred and Raye were above. So yes, 2024 with fairly decent tour of their own plus Reading, 2025 plenty of outdoor shows, 2026 back at Reading. I'd be very surprised if they were picked on a 4th yesr straight touring by Glastonbury in 2027.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ben7amin_ said:

I think in this community where a lot of us do a lot of gigging and festivaling quite a lot while perusing every line up as they come out. Yes this might seem like bands who have been around a lot. But-   

 

For a lot of people Leeds & Reading is a coming of age right of passage -  a lot of the attendees will be young and it will be there first festival. -  they will care not if the acts that are playing have been around a lot recently -  It wont be on their radar one bit. 

 

 

 

 

Tbf when my friends went to Reading and Leeds in the late 2000s/early 2010s when we were in our teens/early 20s, that was a part of it and there'll be people still going according to that. So yeah, it's still a part of the festival tradition and I'm aware what teens like now won't be the same as what I was listening to in 2008-13 (and still am)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, fraybentos1 said:

They'll want to strike while the iron's hot I guess. They clearly feel like they can headline Glasto if they turned down the sub slot in 2025. 

I've seen they've been confirmed to headline Electric Picnic in Ireland the week after Reading and Leeds so they're clearly gearing up for something.

 

Do we think they'd accept a sub spot for '27 or are they really now in a headliner or nothing mindset?

 

Tbf Fontaines did play a sub for Biffy Clyro for TRNSMT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, charlierc said:

I've seen they've been confirmed to headline Electric Picnic in Ireland the week after Reading and Leeds so they're clearly gearing up for something.

 

Do we think they'd accept a sub spot for '27 or are they really now in a headliner or nothing mindset?

 

Tbf Fontaines did play a sub for Biffy Clyro for TRNSMT

 

Glastonbury headliners now. I'd be amazed to see them accept anything less

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, mufcok said:

 

Glastonbury headliners now. I'd be amazed to see them accept anything less

They will be now but they'll have to wait until 28 at least

 

I think it's Florence/Chappell if not both, Foos and one more. If they can't get Oasis then I see Fender.

Edited by northernangel
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, mufcok said:

Glastonbury headliners now. I'd be amazed to see them accept anything less

 

They've accepted less at R+L though, and Glastonbury is another level up from R+L.

 

Yes, I know R+L do the "we have 2 headliners a day" pretence in order to massage egos, but if it was really a deal breaker Glastonbury can do some mitigation as well as they've done with Pulp, Foo Fighters, and (kind of) Lizzo in recent years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, incident said:

 

They've accepted less at R+L though, and Glastonbury is another level up from R+L.

 

Yes, I know R+L do the "we have 2 headliners a day" pretence in order to massage egos, but if it was really a deal breaker Glastonbury can do some mitigation as well as they've done with Pulp, Foo Fighters, and (kind of) Lizzo in recent years.

 

Accepted less? They're a headliner, aren't they? Certainly the way it was portrayed on their socials, I haven't delved much further than that.

 

I know for a fact that the turning down the sub-slot last year was 100% correct. To do that, only to accept a sub-slot two or three years down the line would be, well... idiotic.

 

I'm biased, quite a lot, and it's subjective, but for me they're at the peak of their powers now. They know their value right now. Naturally they need to keep delivering with the records.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, mufcok said:

Accepted less? They're a headliner, aren't they? Certainly the way it was portrayed on their socials, I haven't delved much further than that.

 

I know for a fact that the turning down the sub-slot last year was 100% correct. To do that, only to accept a sub-slot two or three years down the line would be, well... idiotic.

 

I'm biased, quite a lot, and it's subjective, but for me they're at the peak of their powers now. They know their value right now. Naturally they need to keep delivering with the records.

 

 

They're being billed as a "second headliner", ie they're playing before Charli XCX.

 

Which is basically a way of taking a sub slot, and making it sound more important.

Edited by incident
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, mufcok said:

 

Accepted less? They're a headliner, aren't they? Certainly the way it was portrayed on their socials, I haven't delved much further than that.

 

I know for a fact that the turning down the sub-slot last year was 100% correct. To do that, only to accept a sub-slot two or three years down the line would be, well... idiotic.

 

I'm biased, quite a lot, and it's subjective, but for me they're at the peak of their powers now. They know their value right now. Naturally they need to keep delivering with the records.

 

I haven't looked into it but I think headliner is a bit too high at Reading, with two its fine but given they got that, next time at Glastonbury it will be headline. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mufcok said:

Last time I went Leeds (14 years, Christ I'm getting old) Pulp & The Strokes essentially co-headlined.

 

Is that what this is, then? A regular R&L occurrence? 

 

For my taste, it's a bit different.

 

The Pulp/Strokes thing was more of a genuine coheadline thing with The Strokes going on last at Reading and Pulp closing the show at Leeds, and both getting full length sets at both shows.

 

Whereas the way they do it now tends to be a defined main headliner playing last at both sites, and a "second headliner" before them. In this case Charli XCX is the main headliner for the day. So it's likely FDC will start at about 8pm or so, maybe earlier depending on how long they and Charli each get.

 

It's basically a way to allow R&L to market that they deliver more, while at the same time allowing the acts the kudos of claiming headliner status. But by any definition there is a clear hierarchy of the acts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, mufcok said:

Last time I went Leeds (14 years, Christ I'm getting old) Pulp & The Strokes essentially co-headlined.

 

Is that what this is, then? A regular R&L occurrence? 

 

Not even essentially, they were down as co-headliners.

 

If twice bands are given the same amount of time, especially if its 1.5 which then they are both full headlining. The Florence and Chase one will be interesting as she will definitely get 1.5 hours, it's whether they get 1hr 15 or not but I think both will get the same. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, incident said:

 

For my taste, it's a bit different.

 

The Pulp/Strokes thing was more of a genuine coheadline thing with The Strokes going on last at Reading and Pulp closing the show at Leeds, and both getting full length sets at both shows.

 

Whereas the way they do it now tends to be a defined main headliner playing last at both sites, and a "second headliner" before them. In this case Charli XCX is the main headliner for the day. So it's likely FDC will start at about 8pm or so, maybe earlier depending on how long they and Charli each get.

 

It's basically a way to allow R&L to market that they deliver more, while at the same time allowing the acts the kudos of claiming headliner status. But by any definition there is a clear hierarchy of the acts.

Surprised Glastonbury haven't started doing this with Other Stage headliners.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...