Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2025 Headliners


Guest

Recommended Posts

For clarity I was the one who said "face of a movement", thought it was pretty clear I meant the burgeoning grime scene that was exploding in this country around the time he was booked, of which Stormzy was very much at the forefront. Add in his campaigning for Grenfell and his support for getting kids from disadvantaged backgrounds into higher education and you have a guy who was very much prevalent at the time.

Why someone felt the need to start going on about "equality" is something I cannot fathom.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Hugh Jass II said:

For clarity I was the one who said "face of a movement", thought it was pretty clear I meant the burgeoning grime scene that was exploding in this country around the time he was booked, of which Stormzy was very much at the forefront. Add in his campaigning for Grenfell and his support for getting kids from disadvantaged backgrounds into higher education and you have a guy who was very much prevalent at the time.

Why someone felt the need to start going on about "equality" is something I cannot fathom.

This was what I was referring to. Is equality not trying to treat everyone the same and presented with the same chances. It may not be the wording people would have chosen, but this was my reasoning behind it.....what he stood for....not the color of him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SomeoneListeningIn said:

Feel like we'll get one of Rihanna or Lady Gaga, one of Sam Fender or Dave and then an older/returning headliner.

Yeah that’s where I’m at too - Fender, Gaga, another. No clue who that other would be though - does feel like the pot is dwindling on older or returning acts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, FloopFiller said:

Yeah that’s where I’m at too - Fender, Gaga, another. No clue who that other would be though - does feel like the pot is dwindling on older or returning acts. 

Dave, Rihanna, Springsteen is what I'm going with from that formula just now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SomeoneListeningIn said:

Dave, Rihanna, Springsteen is what I'm going with from that formula just now.

Don’t see Springsteen returning to the farm and/or touring the U.K. at all again next year, even if he does seem like one of the few oldie candidates who could come back for seconds. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also wouldn't be surprised for them to go for both Gaga and Rihanna if they're available after hyping up and failing to get 2 female headliners this year.

Obviously both from the same era but they're pretty different stylistically and both a rare get nowadays. Would be cool to see them both get the gig.

Only problem with that though is that I'd say it diminishes the chance of the third headliner being Dave/Fender/Rodrigo, which would be a shame considering 2025 will seemingly be a good year to book some fresh faces.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, FloopFiller said:

Don’t see Springsteen returning to the farm and/or touring the U.K. at all again next year, even if he does seem like one of the few oldie candidates who could come back for seconds. 

Aye, can't see him running into 2025. 

So l'll take The 1975 / Lady Gaga / Billy Joel for twenty, please Bob. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, NorthernSoul52 said:

Aye, can't see him running into 2025. 

So l'll take The 1975 / Lady Gaga / Billy Joel for twenty, please Bob. 

Can't see The 1975 getting the gig over Fender/Dave/O-Rod. Think they got f**ked by the festival choosing AM over them last year. I reckon that was their chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, SomeoneListeningIn said:

Can't see The 1975 getting the gig over Fender/Dave/O-Rod. Think they got f**ked by the festival choosing AM over them last year. I reckon that was their chance.

They’ll get their chance after the next album release for sure in my opinion. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, AndyL16 said:

They’ll get their chance after the next album release for sure in my opinion. 

Maybe, but if it's the same year that Dave/Fender/O-Rod are also available then I don't think they'd be the first getting the call.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, SomeoneListeningIn said:

Maybe, but if it's the same year that Dave/Fender/O-Rod are also available then I don't think they'd be the first getting the call.

If the chatter that Dave is on the bill this year but not headlining turns out to be true, then - unless it's a secret slot - he's blown a chance for the next few years.

I hope that's not the case, but we'll see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, hear me out, but I don’t think that it’s too absurd to start considering someone like Beyoncé for the ‘older legend’ spot. 
 

While she’s not actually that old, Dangerously in Love 2 is on the latest setlist and that came out as close to Rumours as it did to 2025. There was the same time between the formation of Destiny’s Child and Rosa Parks’ bus protest as there will be between their formation and Glasto 2025. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, On The Blend said:

Okay, hear me out, but I don’t think that it’s too absurd to start considering someone like Beyoncé for the ‘older legend’ spot.

Why not just consider her as a headliner, and not worry about which box she fits into?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Hugh Jass II said:

And if she ever did she certainly isn't playing Sunday afternoon just before Elbow.

To be fair I took "older legend" as an attempt to categorise the headliners rather than suggesting her for Sunday 4pm.

The problem I have with that is that trying to stick rigidly to a formula of "One upcoming, One established, one legend" is that it limits things way too much when really a lot of the time it's going to come down to who's available. She'd comfortably be headline status by any standard, and so if available who else is playing shouldn't matter all that much and what categories they fall into.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...