Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Football 2023/24


charlierc

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Skip997 said:

Of course they won't. People don't care about the game being officiated properly.

It's all tribal bollocks, the game is a farce and all people want to do is make pathetic comments about Klopp wanting replays.

If you could all get your heads out of your arses (@Crazyfool01 excepted) and come together over this then just maybe we might be able to watch a game won and lost on merit, not on the wims of at best incompetent refs.

Of course if it was utd that had the decision, you would be completely sympathetic. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, kaosmark2 said:

Who are Liverpool fans going to blame for that goal? Can't be their own team's fault.

Van Dijk for the first one, stupid pass, lots of other options available.

Robertson for the 2nd, should have cleared it at the near post (though I'm not convinced it should have been a free kick).

The most annoying thing about the officiating is the inconsistency, on MOTD2 last night it was clear to see a player booked for waving an imaginary card and then nothing happening when a player on the opposing side did it. I

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Gnomicide said:

The most annoying thing about the officiating is the inconsistency, on MOTD2 last night it was clear to see a player booked for waving an imaginary card and then nothing happening when a player on the opposing side did it. I

"inconsistency"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just think that feeling cheated and occasionally getting away with one is a desirable thing in football - its part of the fun of it all. I dont want metronomic perfection with decisions, i want to seethe and shout familial abuse at a bald man from a northern town. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, balti-pie said:

I just think that feeling cheated and occasionally getting away with one is a desirable thing in football - its part of the fun of it all. I dont want metronomic perfection with decisions, i want to seethe and shout familial abuse at a bald man from a northern town. 

Indeed. Scoring from a corner that should have been a goal kick is one of life's joys.

Edited by Gnomicide
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Punksnotdead said:

What a load of f**king bollocks!

Paranoid, much?

Interestingly, its really tribal bollocks, which is what Skip was deriding in an earlier post 😄 its all come over a bit Alanis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So having been regulars in the bottom half in the Championship in the last few years, Birmingham City seem to have stabilised and were even in the top 6 in the league after beating local rivals WBA, only to sack manager John Eustace to make way for Wayne Rooney.

This has all the hallmarks of potentially going wrong. Not least given Birmingham sacked a manager in the play-offs for a "bigger name" in the form of Zola in 2016, only to end up nearly going down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, balti-pie said:

Interestingly, its really tribal bollocks, which is what Skip was deriding in an earlier post 😄 its all come over a bit Alanis

Maybe it's best for all concerned that it's now international break time. If only so we can stop going round in circles about which clubs the referees are absolutely screwing over in favour of asking why Gareth Southgate keeps picking Henderson or Kalvin Phillips.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, charlierc said:

So having been regulars in the bottom half in the Championship in the last few years, Birmingham City seem to have stabilised and were even in the top 6 in the league after beating local rivals WBA, only to sack manager John Eustace to make way for Wayne Rooney.

This has all the hallmarks of potentially going wrong. Not least given Birmingham sacked a manager in the play-offs for a "bigger name" in the form of Zola in 2016, only to end up nearly going down.

is brum still owned by the dildo twins?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, charlierc said:

Nah they bailed in 2009 and brought West Ham a year or so later. David Gold died earlier this year, but Sullivan and Gold's daughter are majority shareholders of them at present.

Thanks forgot that gold had died. Knew about whu, wasn't sure if  they were out of Brum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Neil said:

Thanks forgot that gold had died. Knew about whu, wasn't sure if  they were out of Brum.

Nah mutli-club ownerships are getting increasingly common but I don't think we're yet at the point of people owning multiple clubs in England at the same time. They sold Birmingham, decided they wanted to stay in the sport, and decided to jump straight back in by buying West Ham at a time their then-owners had no money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...