Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Sziget 2023


#1SzigetFan

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Sziget2023_Leaks said:

None of them are coming

C7ACAB9F-3328-442A-8A03-19AE74C6965D.png.0cc204a377c19e225f32e5010c264de5.png

So no Depeche Mode, Maneskin, Muse, Coldplay, Taylor Swift, Billie Eilish, Beyonce, Rihanna, Katy Perry, Harry Styles, Bruce Springsteen, Tove Lo, Queen or Bon Jovi? 

Who or what is a Moderat?

EDIT: Just had a listen to Moderat. They seem to be this year's Rufus Du Sol so I'll put them as subs. 

Edited by swelsbyuk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, swelsbyuk said:

So no Depeche Mode, Maneskin, Muse, Coldplay, Taylor Swift, Billie Eilish, Beyonce, Rihanna, Katy Perry, Harry Styles, Bruce Springsteen, Tove Lo, Queen or Bon Jovi? 

Who or what is a Moderat?

EDIT: Just had a listen to Moderat. They seem to be this year's Rufus Du Sol so I'll put them as subs. 

He pretty puch confirmed Billie Eilish in previous posts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, lighthouse said:

He pretty puch confirmed Billie Eilish in previous posts. 

He said that none are coming in relation to this post, which contains Billie Eilish: 

Depeche mode and Maneskin are out since they are in Budapest just before Sziget. Muse very likely coming. Coldplay don't do festivals it seems. It's obvious Taylor is not coming but I still expect one big pop diva. Sorry but Billie is not that category. I'm talking Beyonce, Rihanna, Katy Perry... There are indications they will do shows next year. Styles and Springsteen don't have Hungarian dates but both having last European date on tour around 2 weeks before Sziget so don't know how likely is that. Would be awesome but can't see it. Tove Lo should be coming with new album out for sure. Queen is planning last tour with Lambert apparently so would be nice. Sambora hinted he may reunite with Bon Jovi so let's see... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Fabrizzo said:

if people don't know Moderat maybe it's better they don't discuss about music....

Why? I've heard of them but I don't know any of their songs because they operate in a genre that holds no interest for me. So, I'd happily say I don't know Moderat - but I guarantee I know just as much about music as anyone else on this forum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, billybigballs said:

Why? I've heard of them but I don't know any of their songs because they operate in a genre that holds no interest for me. So, I'd happily say I don't know Moderat - but I guarantee I know just as much about music as anyone else on this forum.

I'm sorry, downvote me but how can you judge whether a band is headlining or not or what stage they're going to play on if you have no idea who they are? when I read some name that is unknown to me, I go to Google, I see how many listeners it has on Spotify, I get information and maybe even listen to a song if I have time... This is the only way to get an idea of where that artist can be placed in a festival

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Fabrizzo said:

I'm sorry, downvote me but how can you judge whether a band is headlining or not or what stage they're going to play on if you have no idea who they are? when I read some name that is unknown to me, I go to Google, I see how many listeners it has on Spotify, I get information and maybe even listen to a song if I have time... This is the only way to get an idea of where that artist can be placed in a festival

That obviously refers to me. This webpage is just views on a festival, with opinion, conjecture and speculation being thrown around all over the place. For me that's due to a love of music, a fondness for Sziget festival and an excitement as announcement day comes.

I don't study and revise before posting. It's fun, not an exam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, swelsbyuk said:

That obviously refers to me. This webpage is just views on a festival, with opinion, conjecture and speculation being thrown around all over the place. For me that's due to a love of music, a fondness for Sziget festival and an excitement as announcement day comes.

I don't study and revise before posting. It's fun, not an exam.

I understand your point of view and respect it but I don't think you can speculate without knowing the bands, peace

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Fabrizzo said:

I understand your point of view and respect it but I don't think you can speculate without knowing the bands, peace

I think the downvotes were against your "mr Know it all" attitude, by saying "dont discuss about music if you don't know moderat".

1) even if they were BIG (which is not the case), people are allowed to not know a band/artist, and still free to enjoy Music, don't you think ?

2) I took a look at them, and compares to every single last years' headliners, they are far behind (popularity speaking, I don't judge people tastes). Ex : Tame Impala, Dua Lipa or Arctic Mokeys all have between 20 and 60 millions listeners/month. Moderat just 1.

It's maybe great music, but you have to accept that it is not that popular, and people might not know them ^^

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...