Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

news & politics:discussion


zahidf

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Kurosagi said:

No idea what the ".Y" on the end means, but I'm guessing that UBI refers to Universal Basic Income.

I've not come across people discussing UBI on this thread before and would welcome some sharing of opinions, particularly amongst those with a better grasp of economics and governance.

Intuitively I like how it simplifies the welfare system (and therefore almost pays for itself?) and takes the stigma out of finding yourself having to rely on it. I also like how it provides financial recognition to women who do most of the unpaid caring (and poorly paid caring) jobs in society.

Looking at the link above it seems that when UBI is discussed in countries it gets shot down by those on the right as being 'free money for lazy people'. Whereas those on the left share results of pilots which show "significant declines in poverty, behavioral problems, crime, substance abuse and psychiatric problems, and increases in on-time graduation".

Given the current financial crisis here and elsewhere (and the current discussions about pensions), I'm wondering whether UBI is ripe for a reboot as an idea whose time has come?

The .y was just a typo.

So the "free money for lazy People" argument is used by the right with regards to all benefits. It's not used about landlords for some reason though.

It's quite powerful in terms of giving a real living base for everyone, but expecting people to work for their luxuries.

In most pilots, essential and engaging jobs still manage to get staff. It also often ends up cheaper because of the reduced administration costs compared to any means testing.

The change to it will be tiresome and costly, as with most, but I think it should be a goal in a 2nd/3rd term for Labour.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, fraybentos1 said:

Pensioners getting a 10 % pension rise when benefits might not get the same treatment and public sector workers get next to nothing. Guess it pays to vote Tory eh

Benefits will be lucky to get 3%. Minimum wage 2%.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kaosmark2 said:

So the "free money for lazy People" argument is used by the right with regards to all benefits. It's not used about landlords for some reason though.

Have an upvote for giving me a new retort next time I argue with my brexit-tory loving friend.

1 hour ago, kaosmark2 said:

The change to it will be tiresome and costly, as with most, but I think it should be a goal in a 2nd/3rd term for Labour.

Very wary of any labour leader who would make this kind of commitment after attending a Blair speaking event a year into his first term - he answered a floor question about why he committed the party to following such a regressive tory budget with a "we're doing it to build credibility, but wait for how progressively bold we'll be in our second term". There was applause at the time...

But, would like UBI to at least get on the talking agenda...for any that followed conference did it get brought up even in fringe events?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Zoo Music Girl said:

So do we think Truss maybe misspoke on the triple lock and that's why she has cancelled her media appointments this afternoon? I wonder if she said it in PMQs so that would be the main takeaway from it. It did grab the headlines. 

Another U-turn imminent?

Maybe but she has tweeted that triple lock is staying so who knows?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Kurosagi said:

Have an upvote for giving me a new retort next time I argue with my brexit-tory loving friend.

Very wary of any labour leader who would make this kind of commitment after attending a Blair speaking event a year into his first term - he answered a floor question about why he committed the party to following such a regressive tory budget with a "we're doing it to build credibility, but wait for how progressively bold we'll be in our second term". There was applause at the time...

But, would like UBI to at least get on the talking agenda...for any that followed conference did it get brought up even in fringe events?

I mean, they'll spout some nonsense about "investing" and "providing housing" but we all know that's a special level of bullshit.

As you say, it's not a first term commitment. At the moment, Labour need to reassure the public of economic competence, then inspire with progressive reforms after, but I hope it will be considered and discussed.

I didn't follow conference closely enough to know .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Zoo Music Girl said:

So do we think Truss maybe misspoke on the triple lock and that's why she has cancelled her media appointments this afternoon? I wonder if she said it in PMQs so that would be the main takeaway from it. It did grab the headlines. 

Another U-turn imminent?

Suella Braverman is no longer Home Sec, so I’m guessing it’s that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

Suella Braverman is no longer Home Sec, so I’m guessing it’s that. 

Time to grab some MORE popcorn.

Truss really isn't going to last the week is she.

(And I was REALLY enjoying not seeing/hearing bloody shapps on tv justifying endless amounts of ridiculous shit)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Kurosagi said:

Time to grab some MORE popcorn.

Truss really isn't going to last the week is she.

(And I was REALLY enjoying not seeing/hearing bloody shapps on tv justifying endless amounts of ridiculous shit)

Won’t somebody please think of his spreadsheets!? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • One problem could be that many of the hospitality packages are already sold out. Unless you’ve a media contact, media organisations normally get a hospitality allocation.
    • I agree on WA taking a year off in 2027. But if they got the call from R&L could see them having a similar August to what Fontaines are doing now. A few random shows + 2/3 other festivals. The festival/LN does seem to love them as well so there is a chance they take a punt.   I did see about Rodrigo potentially doing a stadium in Poland but no clue if that would be 2027 or 2028, I just can't see her at the Fest at all, seems too big in current climate.   If I were to guess the headliners next year I'd go with Fred Again/Foos/Capaldi/Olivia Dean/Biffy or Wolf Alice/Some Rapper, Tems?
    • Ulitimately the “Top 6” or top 2 on a day by day basis work as a collective   You could easily have Foo Fighters and someone else much weaker on a single day   As long as they add up to 3, whether they’re a 2 and 1 or both 1.5s it doesn’t really matter   The Florence- Chase and status day is basically a 1.5 and 1, hence it selling the weakest 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...