Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

news & politics:discussion


zahidf

Recommended Posts

Just now, Barry Fish said:

If they don't carry their election promises through to policy...  are they really any better than they lying dishonest tories ?

morally probably not ..... policy wise it would be preferable than the tory ones still just about 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Labour scheme is essentially processing centres in places like France to process the claims then open up safe routes which is ultimately the best way to stop small boat crossings. The Telegraph article makes it sound worse because it's the Telegraph.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ozanne said:

It would if the public didn't think Labour could handle immigration better than the Tories.

tories will say they'll let everyone in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

He didn't say in that write up. Could be that the Telegraph are trying to cause issues for Labour and divert from the Tories?

they are saying that he said he would look at these offshore processing thingies...but where did he say that? Was it in an answer to a journalists question? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

they are saying that he said he would look at these offshore processing thingies...but where did he say that? Was it in an answer to a journalists question? 

I don't know where he said it, possibly talking to the media later on in the day?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

I don't know where he said it, possibly talking to the media later on in the day?

In fact I wouldn't be surprised if he didn't;t really say it at all or it's been twisted. He probably meant opening up processing centres in Northern France.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Barry Fish said:

So we now know Labour won't reverse the Rwanda policy but simply tinker with it.  Makes sense really.  You don't rip up something like that once it gets going.  People tend to forget.  I am sure migrants coming from France won't give it a second thought and will keep coming regardless.

if they rip it up they have to put their own solution in place if they go with the tory plan they can blame the tories for any flaws.

(i said ages ago that it'll be better for labour if the tories get something in place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, squirrelarmy said:

Did you see Nick Fletchers statement? That was eye opening 

 

link for those interested https://parliamentlive.tv/event/index/26b0dd30-b987-4d9c-8a2b-a6e6915e6019?in=17:17:03

I mean you can make an intellectual argument about immigration, but this bloke clearly doesn’t have the brains. For a start if a kid falls over in the street a plaster will probably help avoid the trip to A&E. Secondly I have worked in the NHS for nearly 20 years and never come across these hospitals where nobody speaks English. It’s odd that these MPs never have any evidence to backup these statements.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Neil said:

if they rip it up they have to put their own solution in place if they go with the tory plan they can blame the tories for any flaws.

(i said ages ago that it'll be better for labour if the tories get something in place.

Labour have said multiple times that they will scrap the Rwanda scheme.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ozanne said:

Labour have said multiple times that they will scrap the Rwanda scheme.

if they do they'll need to find a replacement for deporting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Neil said:

if they do they'll need to find a replacement for deporting.

They’ll actually process the claims for a start and either migrants will be allowed in or returned. They won’t waste the money on the Rwanda scheme which will only deport about 100 anyway. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...