Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Football 2015/16


TheGayTent

Recommended Posts

Shaw, Stones, Ox & Sterling.

You're far too optimistic. Of the four you name, I'd suggest that their previous generation equivalents (say Cole, Ferdinand, Beckham, Owen) had greater potential at the same stage in their careers. Each went on to be very good players, but England got no where near winning a major tournament with them.

The current England team aren't a bad side, but they're not going to be winning anything anytime soon.

That's realism, not pessimism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 6.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I understand what you are saying. But surely you can draw comparisons with past and current supposed world class players and their backgrounds - even if you keep it to the premier league. So for example I believe that Ox has the abilities to compete at a similar level to Hazard - (who as premier league player of the year must be nearest to that world class category than anyone).

Well I would put Aguero ahead of Hazard. However I don't see much comparison inability between Hazard and Ox. In terms of age there is only 2 years difference between them. However at a younger age than the ox is now, Hazard was 2 times French player of the year and one of the highest rated (not just in his own country) young player in the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

I wonder if I can get away with watching three matches tomorrow? I've had man-flu all week, so it might be pretty bad asgain tomorrow (luckily, the missus doesn't read this thread :P).

I could enjoy all of Everton/Chelsea, Arsenal/Stoke, and Utd/Liverpool.

 

The last of these should be interesting, as I reckon it'll give some sort of marker of where the teams are in relation to each other for the season - tho not necessarily with the result of the match; how each team performs outside of the actual score means something too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Its really great news, Dave's idea too.

 

Even if its only for a year it means Madrid need to cough up big bucks next year.

 

I dunno about 'big bucks'. Something around the fee agreed this year is more likely I reckon.

 

I can't see him signing anything that will stop his dream move, so there's likely to be a release clause in there and I can't see him agreeing to a high figure.

 

It is good news for Utd tho. Any fee is better than no fee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if I can get away with watching three matches tomorrow? I've had man-flu all week, so it might be pretty bad asgain tomorrow (luckily, the missus doesn't read this thread :P).

I could enjoy all of Everton/Chelsea, Arsenal/Stoke, and Utd/Liverpool.

 

Why don't you go for 4 in a row? A Henry Kelly. Atletico vs Barca on at 7.30!

 

Oh, and the Milan derby is on Sunday night too!

 

And don't forget about the MotoGP in San Marino aswell.

Edited by The Nal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why don't you go for 4 in a row? A Henry Kelly. Atletico vs Barca on at 7.30!

 

Oh, and the Milan derby is on Sunday night too!

 

And don't forget about the MotoGP in San Marino aswell.

 

the full sporting weekends begin again for me this weekend with the return of the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How much is Dave on a week at the mo? What will it cost Utd over the season to bump him up to 200k a week? Would it be reasonable to think they would want to see some of that back in an slight increase to the agreed fee? I'm sure the release clause put in place will aim to protect Urd as well as Dave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dunno about 'big bucks'. Something around the fee agreed this year is more likely I reckon.

 

I can't see him signing anything that will stop his dream move, so there's likely to be a release clause in there and I can't see him agreeing to a high figure.

 

It is good news for Utd tho. Any fee is better than no fee.

 

Bah. 4 years!

 

http://www.manutd.com/en/News-And-Features/Football-News/2015/Sep/David-De-Gea-signs-new-contract-at-Manchester-United.aspx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

 

but the number of years means fuck all if there's a release clause.

 

Given all that's known about DDG's want to return to Spain for both footie and personal reasons, I think it's impossible that the contract hasn't been written in such a way to give him that move next summer.

 

Both DDG and Utd can get something worthwhile out of this. It's all a no-brainer, really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I dunno about 'big bucks'. Something around the fee agreed this year is more likely I reckon.

 

I can't see him signing anything that will stop his dream move, so there's likely to be a release clause in there and I can't see him agreeing to a high figure.

 

It is good news for Utd tho. Any fee is better than no fee.

I agree the release clause must be in there somewhere. Obviously the pay rise must be enough to compensate not getting the bosman boost. I dont think its guaranteed that he will join Madrid next summer. The whole leaving it to the last day and then the move collapsing was a little odd. There may be some resentment on De geas side to Madrid, or maybe they had cold feet over the player.

 

 

I think De Gea (or more likely his agent) is being clever here. As Neil says, I'm sure there will be a release clause for next summer. More importantly for the player, there's no rift between him and LVG, allowing De Gea to be back playing regularly before the Euros.

I cant see him being Spanish keeper in the euros, he has hardly ever played for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

 

I agree the release clause must be in there somewhere. Obviously the pay rise must be enough to compensate not getting the bosman boost. I dont think its guaranteed that he will join Madrid next summer. The whole leaving it to the last day and then the move collapsing was a little odd. There may be some resentment on De geas side to Madrid, or maybe they had cold feet over the player.

 

 

 

whatever happened with the transfer, he wants to go back to Spain.

 

His g/f hates Manc and refuses to live there :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

whatever happened with the transfer, he wants to go back to Spain.

No doubt, but there are only 2 clubs there who could afford/attract him, so there are not huge options. According to the radio today there was a report in Marca which stated the Real Madrid fans were not that bothered about signing him. Considering he hasnt played much in the later stages of the champions league and isnt the national keeper, I suspect his reputation in the UK, may not be matched elsewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree. Think Casillas will play until at least 2016.

 

Dunno, all depends how Casillas does at Porto - even then the step down to Portuguese football must surely be a factor. The end of his time at Madrid damaged his reputation a bit too. 

 

All I'm saying is, by arguing with Van Gaal and sitting on the bench for six months, De Gea wasn't going to force his away in ahead of Casillas. By playing well for United, he may well do. 

Edited by GlastoSimon
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • I got in for £11.25 in the end, which was absolutely ridiculously good value, and made the queues and overselling of the venue much more tolerable! Sniping in on other people’s unwanted tickets on the day of an event might become my new hobby I think 🥳
    • Ann and Nancy Wilson are planning a final world tour for HEART starting next year. They were never at Glastonbury. They should do it. 
    • sub yes I could see but I don't think they get 1hr 15, a headliner starting at 18:15 though is unlikely. Even the recent co-headlines that have had like 1hr 15 then a 1hr 30 after were on 8pm or just before, you are trailing behind more than 1.5 hours then. In that scenario some 3rd down bands are only starting at 18:15 and some haven't lol. I agree they won't not book them due to this but it won't be 6 headliners. It would be 5 headliners and you wouldn't want to see 5 headliners booked but Biffy were to not be thouhgt of as an option for one. Wolf Alice on the other hand could sub no bother and you'd think nothing of it. I'm not so sure Biffy would get headline though after the festival choice in Kendal this year.
    • Definitely. UKIP also used Merkel welcoming 1 million Afgans to Europe in 2015 during the brexit vote.   Politicians in other countries within the EU know the are going to lose voters to parties to the right of them over stuff like this and they've no control over it.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...