Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Football 2015/16


TheGayTent

Recommended Posts

Shaw, Stones, Ox & Sterling.

You're far too optimistic. Of the four you name, I'd suggest that their previous generation equivalents (say Cole, Ferdinand, Beckham, Owen) had greater potential at the same stage in their careers. Each went on to be very good players, but England got no where near winning a major tournament with them.

The current England team aren't a bad side, but they're not going to be winning anything anytime soon.

That's realism, not pessimism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 6.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I understand what you are saying. But surely you can draw comparisons with past and current supposed world class players and their backgrounds - even if you keep it to the premier league. So for example I believe that Ox has the abilities to compete at a similar level to Hazard - (who as premier league player of the year must be nearest to that world class category than anyone).

Well I would put Aguero ahead of Hazard. However I don't see much comparison inability between Hazard and Ox. In terms of age there is only 2 years difference between them. However at a younger age than the ox is now, Hazard was 2 times French player of the year and one of the highest rated (not just in his own country) young player in the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

I wonder if I can get away with watching three matches tomorrow? I've had man-flu all week, so it might be pretty bad asgain tomorrow (luckily, the missus doesn't read this thread :P).

I could enjoy all of Everton/Chelsea, Arsenal/Stoke, and Utd/Liverpool.

 

The last of these should be interesting, as I reckon it'll give some sort of marker of where the teams are in relation to each other for the season - tho not necessarily with the result of the match; how each team performs outside of the actual score means something too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Its really great news, Dave's idea too.

 

Even if its only for a year it means Madrid need to cough up big bucks next year.

 

I dunno about 'big bucks'. Something around the fee agreed this year is more likely I reckon.

 

I can't see him signing anything that will stop his dream move, so there's likely to be a release clause in there and I can't see him agreeing to a high figure.

 

It is good news for Utd tho. Any fee is better than no fee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if I can get away with watching three matches tomorrow? I've had man-flu all week, so it might be pretty bad asgain tomorrow (luckily, the missus doesn't read this thread :P).

I could enjoy all of Everton/Chelsea, Arsenal/Stoke, and Utd/Liverpool.

 

Why don't you go for 4 in a row? A Henry Kelly. Atletico vs Barca on at 7.30!

 

Oh, and the Milan derby is on Sunday night too!

 

And don't forget about the MotoGP in San Marino aswell.

Edited by The Nal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why don't you go for 4 in a row? A Henry Kelly. Atletico vs Barca on at 7.30!

 

Oh, and the Milan derby is on Sunday night too!

 

And don't forget about the MotoGP in San Marino aswell.

 

the full sporting weekends begin again for me this weekend with the return of the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How much is Dave on a week at the mo? What will it cost Utd over the season to bump him up to 200k a week? Would it be reasonable to think they would want to see some of that back in an slight increase to the agreed fee? I'm sure the release clause put in place will aim to protect Urd as well as Dave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dunno about 'big bucks'. Something around the fee agreed this year is more likely I reckon.

 

I can't see him signing anything that will stop his dream move, so there's likely to be a release clause in there and I can't see him agreeing to a high figure.

 

It is good news for Utd tho. Any fee is better than no fee.

 

Bah. 4 years!

 

http://www.manutd.com/en/News-And-Features/Football-News/2015/Sep/David-De-Gea-signs-new-contract-at-Manchester-United.aspx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

 

but the number of years means fuck all if there's a release clause.

 

Given all that's known about DDG's want to return to Spain for both footie and personal reasons, I think it's impossible that the contract hasn't been written in such a way to give him that move next summer.

 

Both DDG and Utd can get something worthwhile out of this. It's all a no-brainer, really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I dunno about 'big bucks'. Something around the fee agreed this year is more likely I reckon.

 

I can't see him signing anything that will stop his dream move, so there's likely to be a release clause in there and I can't see him agreeing to a high figure.

 

It is good news for Utd tho. Any fee is better than no fee.

I agree the release clause must be in there somewhere. Obviously the pay rise must be enough to compensate not getting the bosman boost. I dont think its guaranteed that he will join Madrid next summer. The whole leaving it to the last day and then the move collapsing was a little odd. There may be some resentment on De geas side to Madrid, or maybe they had cold feet over the player.

 

 

I think De Gea (or more likely his agent) is being clever here. As Neil says, I'm sure there will be a release clause for next summer. More importantly for the player, there's no rift between him and LVG, allowing De Gea to be back playing regularly before the Euros.

I cant see him being Spanish keeper in the euros, he has hardly ever played for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

 

I agree the release clause must be in there somewhere. Obviously the pay rise must be enough to compensate not getting the bosman boost. I dont think its guaranteed that he will join Madrid next summer. The whole leaving it to the last day and then the move collapsing was a little odd. There may be some resentment on De geas side to Madrid, or maybe they had cold feet over the player.

 

 

 

whatever happened with the transfer, he wants to go back to Spain.

 

His g/f hates Manc and refuses to live there :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

whatever happened with the transfer, he wants to go back to Spain.

No doubt, but there are only 2 clubs there who could afford/attract him, so there are not huge options. According to the radio today there was a report in Marca which stated the Real Madrid fans were not that bothered about signing him. Considering he hasnt played much in the later stages of the champions league and isnt the national keeper, I suspect his reputation in the UK, may not be matched elsewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree. Think Casillas will play until at least 2016.

 

Dunno, all depends how Casillas does at Porto - even then the step down to Portuguese football must surely be a factor. The end of his time at Madrid damaged his reputation a bit too. 

 

All I'm saying is, by arguing with Van Gaal and sitting on the bench for six months, De Gea wasn't going to force his away in ahead of Casillas. By playing well for United, he may well do. 

Edited by GlastoSimon
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Yep - should have been the Stones.
    • Yeah I do agree on the 2 hour thing. But if they were subbed by Biffy/WA only doing 75 mins or so would be doable.   Only reason I suggested them was because we know they're back doing shows here next year. 
    • Its probably the culmination of issues that have been simmering under the surface for a while. Spain ran a regularisation program recently that allows undocumented individuals to obtain temporary legal status and then a route to EU citizenship. 1.2 million applied. At the same time Montenegro is having to close its citizenship via investment program as part of EU ascension talks.    Countries are obviously asking, why are we having to reject investors whilst others can wave anyone in?
    • I'm not sure, they aren't giving any headliner in that format 2hours and Foos would have at least 2. I wouldn't say Reading is likely for them next year either. If they are as said going big on a tour with stadiums and festivals then the UK is once place they can definitely do stadiums and that would rule them out. And that's even if they come back for a second UK stint as I fully expect them in Europe from very early. That could be seen as hyperthetical but there are is some places I cannot see them not doing from history.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...