Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Blur?


wozwebs

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

13 is probably my favourite album.

I Broadcast and Ong Ong are bloody great songs. The later in particular will sound great on the Pyramid I reckon. There's some slower stuff which I haven't properly appreciated having a drink this evening, but overall I think its (another) great album. Can definitely feel the Japanese influence which is cool

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting pub discussion last night regarding Blur. Me and a couple of mates are huge fans, seen them dozens of times between us, but we were discussing the new album and it was suggested that Blur, for all the fantastic music they've made, have never made a truly great album. They've made seven good to very good albums but have never made that one defining record, arguably their best album is the Midlife compilation, and I say that as a huge fan.

Thoughts?

I think that's because they are a band who evolve and grow. As we can see from what we've heard of The Magic Whip, there is a core 'Blur sound' but there's a different vibe to it. That's the case with each of their albums, I find.

However, I also think that they haven't made a defining album because they haven't made a consistently great album. There's a couple of tracks on each album that either don't do it for me or feel like filler, in my opinion. I'm saying this as a huge fan of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting pub discussion last night regarding Blur. Me and a couple of mates are huge fans, seen them dozens of times between us, but we were discussing the new album and it was suggested that Blur, for all the fantastic music they've made, have never made a truly great album. They've made seven good to very good albums but have never made that one defining record, arguably their best album is the Midlife compilation, and I say that as a huge fan.

Thoughts?

They are very similar to New Order in that regard. Both are fantastic singles bands and they produce very good albums without them being seminal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have a fantastic ability to bring new order into everything!

I find Blur similar to New Order in regards to their output. Both are innovative bands who have stood the test of time, both release fantastic singles. Their albums are consistently good without being bonafide classics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find Blur similar to New Order in regards to their output. Both are innovative bands who have stood the test of time, both release fantastic singles. Their albums are consistently good

without being bonafide classics.

Wasn't having a pop - just find it funny how often you manage to mention them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that's because they are a band who evolve and grow. As we can see from what we've heard of The Magic Whip, there is a core 'Blur sound' but there's a different vibe to it. That's the case with each of their albums, I find.

However, I also think that they haven't made a defining album because they haven't made a consistently great album. There's a couple of tracks on each album that either don't do it for me or feel like filler, in my opinion. I'm saying this as a huge fan of them.

Every [seminal] album has tracks that don't live up to the rest of the album. See: the amount of people that complain about Fitter, Happier from OK Computer, for instance. A whole album doesn't have to be bangers to be incredible, or timeless, in my opinion. In fact, the contrast actually makes the better pieces stand out.

Playing devil's advocate here by the way - I think 13 is their 'masterpiece' but definitely understand there are more tracks than would be desirable as what I've described above.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wasn't having a pop - just find it funny how often you manage to mention them.

No worries fella. I am not going to lie, New Order along with Depeche Mode are my fave bands.

I do like Blur though, they have that English eccentricity. I love the way they can be so innovative and different while still wrapping it all up in a killer pop song.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I seem to be posting this all over the internet tonight but the new album is now available to stream for free on itunes, just go to the band page and click the listen button. It really is fantastic. I'm hoping they don’t play this year as I'm having to put my tickets back in the pot. Having been at the Mode gig and now heard the full album version (several times), if you like Blur I think you'll love it. It all about what they are, always innovative but always manage to sound like Blur.

When I heard it live I thought it sounded so complete, and listening back to the album version that's really what I get. Individually some really stand out tracks but, not one dodgy track, it all hangs together so well. I'm biased but I really do think it's special. Am so excited by it.

Edited by Levitz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Modern Life is Rubbish is my favourite, but this might be down to personal significance as much as it's actual quality. Also very fond of Blur the album. But all the albums have songs I absolutely love on them.

Blur were the first proper band I ever got into, around the age of 13, so I will always love them dearly. When they were first rumoured I was really excited and then started thinking it might not live up to 2009. Now I'm back to excited. Fuck it, clashes aside it'd be a great closer.

However it annoys me when bands give an outright denial and back track. Dave didn't have to say they weren't. He could have said something more vague.

Am I right in thinking there's been no Eavis denial?

I never stream albums but have it on pre order so looking forward to hearing it soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every [seminal] album has tracks that don't live up to the rest of the album. See: the amount of people that complain about Fitter, Happier from OK Computer, for instance. A whole album doesn't have to be bangers to be incredible, or timeless, in my opinion. In fact, the contrast actually makes the better pieces stand out.

Playing devil's advocate here by the way - I think 13 is their 'masterpiece' but definitely understand there are more tracks than would be desirable as what I've described above.

I'm gonna have to stand up for Fitter Happier. and it's a perfect example of what I'm talking about, I think. That track is a perfect fit on the album, for me. It really drags you into the paranoid gloom of the second half of that record. I probably wouldn't put it on a compilation to introduce a friend to Radiohead, but I don't skip it either.

I think it was nailed above: Blur are a great singles band.

I don't think this is a bad thing, necessarily. Their albums are long, so maybe it's just an inability to edit. Like how Muse got shit when they started self producing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm gonna have to stand up for Fitter Happier. and it's a perfect example of what I'm talking about, I think. That track is a perfect fit on the album, for me. It really drags you into the paranoid gloom of the second half of that record. I probably wouldn't put it on a compilation to introduce a friend to Radiohead, but I don't skip it either.

I think it was nailed above: Blur are a great singles band.

I don't think this is a bad thing, necessarily. Their albums are long, so maybe it's just an inability to edit. Like how Muse got shit when they started self producing.

fitter happier is an exception though. It's not even a song so you cant really call it a dud. If you look at the other radiohead albums they are all consistently good. You cant say the same for blur's albums, they all very definitely have duds and definitely would have benefited from someone standing up to damon and insisting on some pruning.

But blur v radiohead is no contest really is it.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not really no. They're both as overrated as each other.

radiohead are the last "legendary" band that will be ranked alongside the greats of the 60s and 70s, no one since has come close to reaching that status.

You should feel blessed that you are alive in this era!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suspected you were a radiohead fan... can spot em a mile off

what part of that post gave it away?

I am not actually that huge a fan. I like them quite a bit, but they are nowhere near my list of favourite artists.

But I do believe they are the only diamond amongst the ocean of shit that is modern music from the 90s onwards.

They are the only hope the 90s onwards has of being remembered decades in the future.

Edited by russycarps
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that's because they are a band who evolve and grow. As we can see from what we've heard of The Magic Whip, there is a core 'Blur sound' but there's a different vibe to it. That's the case with each of their albums, I find.

However, I also think that they haven't made a defining album because they haven't made a consistently great album. There's a couple of tracks on each album that either don't do it for me or feel like filler, in my opinion. I'm saying this as a huge fan of them.

May I ask what age you are mate? Parklife aint perfect, but it is as close to a "defining" album as you can get.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what part of that post gave it away?

I am not actually that huge a fan. I like them quite a bit, but they are nowhere near my list of favourite artists.

But I do believe they are the only diamond amongst the ocean of shit that is modern music from the 90s onwards.

From the constant Oasis bashing! haha. I dont Hate radiohead btw, i like a few of there songs and the Bends is great. But i do think they are ovverated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • I'm British so it very much would apply for me.   I mean, it's a moot point as I don't have tickets so will not be in town for this, but I've heard reports of lengthy queues and given I remember Lisbon Airport having a long queue at arrivals even pre-EES when I went in 2023, I seem to guess it might be quite the wait, depending on flight paths.   Certainly, the worst I've had pre-EES was a 45 minute wait for a stamp at Valencia Airport in Spain, where 4 flights to non-EU destinations in quick succession were placed one after the other. So I can't say I'm enthusiastic about what's in store. Or you know. Maybe I'm just overthinking it.
    • Out of interest keep seeing messages saying last 12 hours etc… to buy you full weekend tickets.  Whats that about? Do they take them off sale early?
    • I reckon it'll be deftones and Biffy clyro 
    • If Friko are replacing The Beths that's a very rare example of a band being replaced by another band who I'm equally eager to see. Great news.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...