Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Babies?


JennieT

Recommended Posts

We have taken our children every year. (They're now 19 and 21) We always had a motorhome, see my sig pic, and there were no problems. Having said that, if you have the option of leaving the baby with babysitters, I'd go for that option. You may not be able to have a child free Glastonbury again, so go for the fun filled blow out. It could be your last for quite some time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

BTW I hate the attitude that Glastonbury is not a place for children. One of our group of three took this stance and, even worse, when drunk would go up to parents and tell them her thoughts!! Absolutely mortifying!! Needless to say she wasn't invited this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BTW I hate the attitude that Glastonbury is not a place for children. One of our group of three took this stance and, even worse, when drunk would go up to parents and tell them her thoughts!! Absolutely mortifying!! Needless to say she wasn't invited this year.

I think I've only encountered one person like this the entire time we've been taking the kids - a pissed up teenager who reacted very negatively to the presence of the bike trailer for no reason whatsoever. She was ignored. Maybe it was your mate :)

Everyone else, of all shapes, sizes, ages, backgrounds and mental states, has always been extremely helpful and really nice, often stopping to say hello to the kids and express some positive thoughts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What kind of creature have you spawned...?

Ha, really need to learn how to type - or proof read. Im sure I know what I meant.

And really not trying to say I am better than anyone for taking my child with me. Everyone does what is correct for themselves and their family. And OBface how on earth have you managed to leave your partner at home. I would love to go solo with a few mates one year but not a chance Mrs Cham would allow that.

One final point if it is muddy avoid the other stage at all costs. I nearly had a breakdown getting there for the Subways on Sunday to the thick, glupey mud that was there. Fortunately the rest of the site was pretty much dry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You say the baby will be 3 months old? So you haven't actually had it yet and is it your first?

I'm just asking because as a parent of many years I still remember how unprepared we were for the reality of having a baby the first time and I'm thinking you might feel differently about bringing a young baby once you know what it entails

. Plus you could really feel the need of a break at that stage and a few days away without the baby could be a better option.

Though as others have said you can decide for definite just before the festival if you have a baby sitter on standby/ can pack for the baby quickly.

Personally we starting bringing ours when they were 5 years old which works for us but younger children work for others

Yep first one and yep not here yet! Im really in 2 minds. Depends how we cope running upto June, as you say we might be glad of the break lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And really not trying to say I am better than anyone for taking my child with me. Everyone does what is correct for themselves and their family. And OBface how on earth have you managed to leave your partner at home. I would love to go solo with a few mates one year but not a chance Mrs Cham would allow that.

Errr I don't really give him an option :) Plus we honestly are much happier if we pursue our own things a few times each year (we're not a couple of steps away from divorce, promise!).

Edited by OBface
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi - we took our little 'un when he was 1 and 2, planning on taking him this year too. He had a fab time both times, though obviously he's that much older. I just wanted to add one thing to most of parents on here, which is that a normal routine is nearly impossible at Glasto. That can be fine or quite difficult depending on your style and your child's personality. it's hard to know in advance. For us, knowing the festival really well helped make us comfortable and ok dealing with the occasional stresses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What kind of creature have you spawned...?

Heh heh, these willies made me laugh almost as much as the "virginal delivery" in the Some News thread. :D

But on topic, I took my son to his first Glastonbury when he was 13 months old, in 2009. It was great fun, we had a biggish tent, a 3-adults-to1-baby ratio, and a nice quiet camping area. Didn't bother with a buggy, I carried him in a sling and we let him groove and cruise around in the less crowded areas (accoustic, theatre etc), I have pictures of him dancing in front of the Avalon bar with his little green ear defenders, these photos are absolutely priceless to me.

I would have loved to go with him in 2008, when he was just one month old (the temptation was particularly strong because tickets were miraculously not selling out until June in that year), but I was recovering from a c-section, still couldn't lift much, and I must admit, I was terrified of taking the precious newborn into potentially muddy conditions, having experienced the mudbaths of 98 and 07 (14 was a doodle by comparison, honestly).

Each to their own, if baby and parents are fit and breastfeeding works out fine (I, for one, would not want to mess around with bottles at a festival, I'd be too nervous about the hygiene aspect), it will probably be a good experience, it is definitely do-able. Easier than it will/would be with a toddler, in my son's toddling years I went to WOMAD with him instead.

Trouble with the tickets is of course that you'll have to decide in April. Good luck with everything!

Edited by midnight
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heh heh, these willies made me laugh almost as much as the "virginal delivery" in the Some News thread. :D

But on topic, I took my son to his first Glastonbury when he was 13 months old, in 2009. It was great fun, we had a biggish tent, a 3-adults-to1-baby ratio, and a nice quiet camping area. Didn't bother with a buggy, I carried him in a sling and we let him groove and cruise around in the less crowded areas (accoustic, theatre etc), I have pictures of him dancing in front of the Avalon bar with his little green ear defenders, these photos are absolutely priceless to me.

I would have loved to go with him in 2008, when he was just one month old (the temptation was particularly strong because tickets were miraculously not selling out until June in that year), but I was recovering from a c-section, still couldn't lift much, and I must admit, I was terrified of taking the precious newborn into potentially muddy conditions, having experienced the mudbaths of 98 and 07 (14 was a doodle by comparison, honestly).

Each to their own, if baby and parents are fit and breastfeeding works out fine (I, for one, would not want to mess around with bottles at a festival, I'd be too nervous about the hygiene aspect), it will probably be a good experience, it is definitely do-able. Easier than it will/would be with a toddler, in my son's toddling years I went to WOMAD with him instead.

Trouble with the tickets is of course that you'll have to decide in April. Good luck with everything!

Thanks for your reply. Might sound selfish but there is no question of me handing my ticket back. Lol. We will have to have granny's on standby baby sitting in case we leave him/her at home. Tough decision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think a baby can enjoy the festival and wont even be aware of what's going on

Babies up to the age of about 5 or six months aren't really aware of what's going on even in "normal" situations, let alone at Glastonbury. That doesn't stop them from enjoying what they experience - they smile and laugh plenty from about 3 months onwards.

Glastonbury is an incredibly stimulating environment for anyone - especially a baby. There's so much for them to see, hear, smell and feel. I for one think that's a positive thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I took my son in 2013 when was just under 6 months. Yes it totally different festival that what we were used to but I have to say I think I enjoyed it more. It was great to spend time together as a family and he enjoyed all the sights and sounds.
More planning was required before going and when getting ready each day. We took a off road three wheeler pram and it coped fine, even with the day of mud. The NCT tent in the kidz field was great. We bought a caravan and it made things much easier then it would have been in a tent.
I had decided he would be going before he was even born. At the time my husband disagreed but once we were there he told me he had been wrong and was really glad that I had insisted. We never had any issues with any other festival goers. In fact loads of people came to speak to us to tell us they thought it was great we had brought our son. Our pimped up pram got lots of comments to)
We would have taken him again this year if we had managed to get tickets. However we were successful for next years festival so he will be attending his second Glastonbury at nearly 2 and a half.
Would I have taken him at 3 months? Yes I would.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I ever had children I can't imagine taking them to Glastonbury until they were 4 - 5 years old. I love seeing children and babies at Glastonbury - it gives it a nice different feel however I couldn't imagine coping unless I had a caravan - especially if taking a baby. I don't think a baby can enjoy the festival and wont even be aware of what's going on

If their eyes are open, I can't imagine them not enjoying it
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As has been mentioned babies are actually much easy than older children, that said I would never tale a baby to Glastonbury or any other festival as I dont see what the babies get out of it.
We waited until they were toddlers, then they can really interact with people and take in their surroundings, also slightly better when they are still in nappies for obvious reasons lol
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I ever had children I can't imagine taking them to Glastonbury until they were 4 - 5 years old. I love seeing children and babies at Glastonbury - it gives it a nice different feel however I couldn't imagine coping unless I had a caravan - especially if taking a baby. I don't think a baby can enjoy the festival and wont even be aware of what's going on

We took our baby boy of six months to Glastonbury in 2013. He's generally a very happy little lad anyway, but I don't think I've ever seen him happier than during those 5 days! The people, the colour, the sound, smells and energy of the place were just perfect for him. This year I was there solo and working, so he had to stay home with his Mum, but we're definitely taking him next year!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tbh, I think it's more about what the parent wants to do than what the baby gets out of it. If you really want to go and don't want to separate from your babies you take them along. They want to be with you at that age, no matter where. There's plenty of things you'll have to compromise on once you are a parent - why compromise where you don't really have to? Or if you have a lovely granny who is keen to take over on stand-by, great.

My son would have been just as happy to go on any old camping trip or some 3-day-funfair (any unusual noise or light triggered a cute "owwwhhhhhh" sound), but I was glad I could take him along and didn't have to miss out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ha, really need to learn how to type - or proof read. Im sure I know what I meant.

.

It's the auto-correct. it changes wellies to willies every time, many people have been caught out by this before.

Yep first one and yep not here yet! Im really in 2 minds. Depends how we cope running upto June, as you say we might be glad of the break lol.

Congratulations

If I ever had children I can't imagine taking them to Glastonbury until they were 4 - 5 years old. I love seeing children and babies at Glastonbury - it gives it a nice different feel however I couldn't imagine coping unless I had a caravan - especially if taking a baby. I don't think a baby can enjoy the festival and wont even be aware of what's going on

As has been mentioned babies are actually much easy than older children, that said I would never tale a baby to Glastonbury or any other festival as I dont see what the babies get out of it.
We waited until they were toddlers, then they can really interact with people and take in their surroundings, also slightly better when they are still in nappies for obvious reasons lol

Same as us, ours were 5 and 6 years old the first time they went, it suited us best.

Tbh, I think it's more about what the parent wants to do than what the baby gets out of it. If you really want to go and don't want to separate from your babies you take them along. They want to be with you at that age, no matter where. There's plenty of things you'll have to compromise on once you are a parent - why compromise where you don't really have to? Or if you have a lovely granny who is keen to take over on stand-by, great.

My son would have been just as happy to go on any old camping trip or some 3-day-funfair (any unusual noise or light triggered a cute "owwwhhhhhh" sound), but I was glad I could take him along and didn't have to miss out.

^^ this, it's well doable but it has to be up to the individual (and their children of course) whether it's a good idea or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There that picture of the little baby st Eddy Grant that shows how much a tiny baby can enjoy the festival.

i've never had a baby or child to take, but I love seeing them there, & I've loved reading this thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was considering taking our little one who will be one at next years festival but decided to wait another year or two til they can appreciate it more, I was planning to use a sling and camp in the family camping area, I know people who have taken babies and had a great time. Sounds like you've got some excellent advice from this thread.. Hope it goes well if you do decide to go with the little one :) I'll be making the most of my last glasto with my friends as our son will be with my other half at home, I'm going to miss him so badly!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...