Jump to content

Tickets -- multiple browser tab warning?


Guest robu
 Share

Recommended Posts

The new ticket information page on the Glastonbury website now carries the following warning:

• Attempting to book tickets online using multiple browser tabs can confuse the ticket sales process and cause your transaction to fail. We strongly advise that you use just one single browser tab when trying to book tickets, in order to avoid possible problems with your transaction.

I've used multiple browser tabs successfully in the past and always thought they increased the chance of getting through to the booking page.

Have they now wised up to this and taken measures to stop it? Or is it a red herring?

Any thoughts (particularly from tech/web-literate types)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 305
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

it appears to be the case (from last year's sale) that each tab is using the same server session, meaning that there's no advantage in using multiple tabs.

For those who did use multiple tabs last time, you might have noticed that the moment one of those tabs got the buy page, each f the other tabs did too. That's what's saying to me that they all use the same session.

I'm not sure if using separate indows works the same or not, but I'm pretty certain that if you used a number of "private browsing" windows (which is available within Firefox, if not other browsers) they'd all wrk separately from each other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not aware of any way in which the See system could identify someone using multiple tabs and then forcibly deny a session being loaded back to the browser.

Certainly as Neil says multiple tabs did tend to grab a 'buy' page simultaneously suggesting a single session - which would imply no advantage in the chances of obtaining the 'buy' page itself, IMHO though there is still the advantage in that if your completed and sent 'buy' page fails and your 'back' button won't reload it you do then have 'spare' buy pages to complete and resend rather than having to retry - although it could be this very process that See are suggesting as being risky........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not aware of any way in which the See system could identify someone using multiple tabs and then forcibly deny a session being loaded back to the browser.

Certainly as Neil says multiple tabs did tend to grab a 'buy' page simultaneously suggesting a single session - which would imply no advantage in the chances of obtaining the 'buy' page itself, IMHO though there is still the advantage in that if your completed and sent 'buy' page fails and your 'back' button won't reload it you do then have 'spare' buy pages to complete and resend rather than having to retry - although it could be this very process that See are suggesting as being risky........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it's setup as last year then it's not a queue as such still, just trying to get your cable connected as another falls out.

Unless their moving to an AXS type platform, where I believe it keeps you in some sort of queue (in which case you'd be best off having 3/4 windows/sessions/private browsing windows at the start to try and get a high number in the queue).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've always had multiple tabs (as well as devices) open, manually refreshing on timeouts and was successful in getting my mits on tickets 6 times out of the last 7 attempts. Apart from the epic fail last year that is when I left auto-refresh to do its job following the advice of my (supposedly) geek other half. But then, each year's bun fight is a new trial - I mean - learning experience...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is simply See trying to limit the number of unnecessary refresh requests all hitting the server (load balancer), all of which the system is trying to honor, and therefore improve its overall performance somewhat.

"I'm not sure if using separate windows works the same or not, but I'm pretty certain that if you used a number of "private browsing" windows (which is available within Firefox, if not other browsers) they'd all work separately from each other."

Having multiple tabs open on the same browser or multiple browsers on the same machine would typically make no difference assuming that the server end is maintaining session processes based on IP (which would remain the same for each client). If the server end based its sessions on something at the application layer like the browser banner (very unlikely), then there might be an advantage in using different browsers from different vendors on the same machine.

The only way of using multiple browser sessions to your advantage is for them all to have a unique public IP, as each one of these will be dealt its own unique session ID by the server end. Thus, you will need to be refreshing from a number of different machines, each of which has its own unique, unshared, connection to the internet and therefore its own public IP and its own session on the server.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only way of using multiple browser sessions to your advantage is for them all to have a unique public IP, as each one of these will be dealt its own unique session ID by the server end. Thus, you will need to be refreshing from a number of different machines, each of which has its own unique, unshared, connection to the internet and therefore its own public IP and its own session on the server.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To your work network you mean... ;) With this however the VPN gateway becomes default, so you have to put another static route for See on your machine pointing out to your original gateway with a higher metric value so that you can continue to browse from both networks. Some firms prevent you from doing that however for obvious security reasons...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...