Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Lineup 2015


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 19.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Gucci Piggy

    1973

  • dentalplan

    1626

  • justanothername

    1166

  • Yellow_Fellow

    979

The closer we get to the announcements the more I'm liking the way this year's shaping up. I know it's been said a thousand times already but a strong NME headliner against Mumford (personally would love it to be Knife Party) would be a cracking weekend, + the thought of The Vaccines / Alt-J / FOB as subs is a hell of a lot more appealing than Jake Bugg / Macklemore.

Edited by JSmurphy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cheers for the info Neil. Metallica and Libertines is a good start, really. Better than I'd expected. One I'd definitely see and one I'd happily see depending on clashes.

On the Linkin Park subject, they definitely aren't any more likely than people act like they are on here. I thought it would be them for a long time, but after the Metallica announcement I became less sure (still thinking it could be them). I did continue to push them a lot as a possibility so that anything else would be a nice surprise. Although Mumford are probably the only band who wouldn't have been a nice surprise in comparison.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

It does seem more of a prospect than before but Mumfords are still just 'R' on the listings.

that's more a historical consequence and there being no new info about them specifically.

But other stuff that happens around other bands is causing others to be less likely or not at all, and so is increasing the chances that Mumfords is right - and it does come from a definitely decent* source, too.

(* decent, tho not infallible. Any wrongness is not because he's badly connected but because he's sort-of too well connected).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

that's more a historical consequence and there being no new info about them specifically.

But other stuff that happens around other bands is causing others to be less likely or not at all, and so is increasing the chances that Mumfords is right - and it does come from a definitely decent* source, too.

(* decent, tho not infallible. Any wrongness is not because he's badly connected but because he's sort-of too well connected).

Neil any chance of NGHFB playing or V and T yet again?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Libertines, The Prodigy, Catfish and the Bottlemen, The Courteeners, Disclosure, Kasabian, Noel Gallagher's HFB, Oliver Heldens, Slaves, Knife Party are all acts I'd love to see at R/L '15.

Out of these, who do you think are likely to be there?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Libertines, The Prodigy, Catfish and the Bottlemen, The Courteeners, Disclosure, Kasabian, Noel Gallagher's HFB, Oliver Heldens, Slaves, Knife Party are all acts I'd love to see at R/L '15.

Out of these, who do you think are likely to be there?

Libertines, Catfish, Slaves and Knife Party.

Prodigy almost certainly won't be cause they're headlining IOW.

Courteeners probably just won't play after last year as it'd be the same set.

Same with Disclosure.

Kasabian and Noel will probably be at V instead (especially Noel).

No idea about Oliver Heldens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Libertines, Catfish, Slaves and Knife Party.

Prodigy almost certainly won't be cause they're headlining IOW.

Courteeners probably just won't play after last year as it'd be the same set.

Same with Disclosure.

Kasabian and Noel will probably be at V instead (especially Noel).

No idea about Oliver Heldens.

Nice one mate

I doubted Kasabian as soon as Metallica were announced, as I doubt R/L would have two bands come down from Glasto'.

And I thought Noel could be a possibility as he subbed Stone Roses at T and V in 2012, so I thought he might do R/L this year as he's got a new album out and he's not played R/L solo yet and he's not played (with Oasis) since 2000 so I thought he could play this year.

Absolutely buzzin' for Libertines though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice one mate

I doubted Kasabian as soon as Metallica were announced, as I doubt R/L would have two bands come down from Glasto'.

And I thought Noel could be a possibility as he subbed Stone Roses at T and V in 2012, so I thought he might do R/L this year as he's got a new album out and he's not played R/L solo yet and he's not played (with Oasis) since 2000 so I thought he could play this year.

Absolutely buzzin' for Libertines though.

Yeah Noel could play, and he'd definitely be suited to subbing The Libertines. Just reckon he's more likely for V tbh. They seem to have all the 90s Britpoppy kinda acts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really hope he does play R&L this year, subbing Libertines would be brilliant imo. I just hope he doesn't play V and T this year again. But just thinking, although it would be a crap booking if he did play both of those as he did in 2012. He also played IOW, so what's to stop him from playing 3 in the UK again? (Correct me if i'm wrong)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really hope he does play R&L this year, subbing Libertines would be brilliant imo. I just hope he doesn't play V and T this year again. But just thinking, although it would be a crap booking if he did play both of those as he did in 2012. He also played IOW, so what's to stop him from playing 3 in the UK again? (Correct me if i'm wrong)

Yeah he could play three, but R&L just don't share acts with V because they're so close together (except the odd tiny act).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah Noel could play, and he'd definitely be suited to subbing The Libertines. Just reckon he's more likely for V tbh. They seem to have all the 90s Britpoppy kinda acts.

Glasto and V for Noel this year I reckon. Thinking V might give a headliner slot this time but not so sure Glasto will do that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bullet For My Valentine have announced that their new album is out this year and they'll be touring the UK and worldwide this year... Potential Metallica sub? This will be their fifth album so far and radio 1 seem to always hype them up when they release something new. Plus if FOB don't sub, I couldn't really see a problem with them subbing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...