Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Football 2013-2014


Guest kaosmark2

Recommended Posts

  • Admin

So "weak as piss" Wenger with his rudderless/leaderless side is in a cup final against Hull and more or less confirmed 4th.

It's a big failure compared to how they were flying early season, but mostly caused I'd say by some massive injuries to important players - yet again.

Their biggest loss has probably been Ramsey because he was such a monster for them, but there's been plenty of others with longer injuries. The combined effect has been to nibble away the advantage they had.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 8.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Norwhich have liverpool, Man Utd, Chelsea and Arsenal to come. Very hard to get points from that.

Fulham have Spurs, Hull, Stoke and Crystal Palace,. Slightly easier fixtures, they may be able to get 3-6 points from that. I think considering Sunderland and Cardiff will struggle i think, and i suspect Fulham may be able to do it.

Fulham are currently 18th and need three points and for Norwhich not to win against Liverpool to be out of the relegation zone

Edited by zahidf
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a big failure compared to how they were flying early season, but mostly caused I'd say by some massive injuries to important players - yet again.

Their biggest loss has probably been Ramsey because he was such a monster for them, but there's been plenty of others with longer injuries. The combined effect has been to nibble away the advantage they had.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Enrique's hardly played. Sturridge missed nine games - I think it was nine - around Christmas. Henderson about to miss three. Agger and sakho missed quite a few - both of whom start before toure. Johnson had a lengthy lay off at start of season.

Lucas was first team till he got injured. Suarez missed first five games.

Other than that they've had their first eleven every match.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Enrique's hardly played. Sturridge missed nine games - I think it was nine - around Christmas. Henderson about to miss three. Agger and sakho missed quite a few - both of whom start before toure. Johnson had a lengthy lay off at start of season.

Lucas was first team till he got injured. Suarez missed first five games.

Other than that they've had their first eleven every match.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

So why didn't they go and buy some players to cover in January? Liverpool have had plenty of injuries this season, mainly to the defence. In January they went and got in a couple of defenders, Arsenal didn't do anything - yet again.

I'm guessing because there were no good-enough players available that would make a better team than what they already have.

Arsenal aren't the only team that tried to buy better in January and came away with nothing of much worth.

And then there's the teams who did buy what they thought was better - for mega-bucks too in some cases - and have seen no improvement. There's teams both within and outside of the top 4 who did that.

It's easy to say; it's hard to do.

Wenger's a bit more stubborn than most in taking a gamble - but even he did that in January by bringing in a crocked player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Neil when you say conceding the most goals of any team this season what do you mean?

Spurs have conceded six more never mind teams at the bottom.

ahh, OK. I'm wrong then.

It's a comment I've heard or read a few times, but I've not actually checked the numbers.

I'm guessing, then, it's a statement that's being said around a particular context, but that context isn't always being said with the statement.

Edited by eFestivals
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Flanagans turned into a proper player.

He has. Poor Martin Kelly; it's not like he's not a very good youngster.

Sterling too. The improvement in him over the season has been awesome.

Who's the guy with the funny name at Utd again? What's happened to him? He's shit compared to Sterling now. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read an inteeresting article last night about whether it would be "romantic" if liverpool won the league, and whether there's anything sane in the idea that they'll have won by "cheating" because they didn't have to play in Europe.

It's certainly easier to not have those extra games, but 'cheating'? Nah. They tried to be in Europe, and they failed. You don't cheat by failing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Cheating is a stupid term, liverpool not playing in europe is a factor, but its one of many. Some clubs who are playing in europe have larger squads to accomodate.

yup - not playing in Europe is both an advantage and a disadvantage.

To pretend that the easy way to win the league is from 7th is a joke, as proven by all the other teams that have failed to do so in the Chumps era.

Edited by eFestivals
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • I agree but anyone under Rodrigo would be a sub in reality, that day would sell out in under an hour whoever is subbing, in which case Wolf Alice would make a lot of sense   The more unrealistic part of the scenario at this point is Rodrigo headlining   
    • All you can say is...     If he couldn't convince nations that really would've benefitted from the short-term hit of an up-front £50mil payment by this time next year, what hope did he have?   Guess we'll now just have to monitor and see if this could derail Infantino's plans to be re-elected FIFA President next year.
    • Spider-Man: Brand New Day   Highlight was a bloke reacting to the post-credit scene by going "Holy f**k it's Tobey Maguire!" despite the scene having no reference to him at all. Which made my close-to-full screening of the film laugh a lot.   Film was pretty good. It was interesting as much as an exploration of the ramifications of the end of No Way Home and being about isolationism and male loneliness, which I thought it actually did quite well. Though I do ponder if I liked it as much as the other 3 Tom Holland Spider-Man movies. Sadie Sink was good tbf, while I also liked Jon Bernthal as Punisher, enough that I might go watch his Disney+ shows.   Seem to have had a Marvel kick recently having also watched Thunderbolts and Shang-Chi, both of which I thought were pretty good.
    • Wolf Alice won't get headliner for Reading either, they will sub if they play, that is where their level has stopped I feel. Both TFG and Skyvip for the big shows this year was just a stretch too far. Every headliner this year is bigger than them too I'd say.   Agree with Capaldi I don't think Yungblud will be at Reading. I would guess Bludfest 3 or Download.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...