Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

F1 2012


Guest Barry Fish

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 94
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Agree about Croft... I also find some of the lady presenters a bit naff... Too much girly giggles and fluttering of eye lids at the drivers... I miss Lee Mckenzie on the BBC... She was very good.

So mostly I like the Sky converge expect for a few bits. Got to give them some time to grow into the role I suppose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Georgie Thompson is alright, Natalia Pinkham is horrific though, suprised she wasn't asking them what their favourite colours were!!

Actually she wasn't that bad but her presentation style is definitely on the giggly side.

They all need to ensure that they don't end up down the 'oh so chummy with everyone' route that the BBC ended up with, where the presenting team and drivers/ officials etc, all seemed to be best mates, there should be a divide between them, otherwise it will just end up as a series of in jokes.

It was hugely refreshing not having Jordan on my screen too, I see he wasn't taken along by the BBC either, with their limited time now, they could ill afford to have him asking questions, that turn into statements, that eventually end up with him commenting on his own dress sense!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was anti Alonso for a while for the exact opposite reason... But to be frank neither Hamilton or Alonso behaved as they should and for me its well in the past. I admire Alonso...

Big season for Button... His World Championship win was pretty handed to him on a plate... Last season at McLaren impressed me more. But you know what, I can't get away from the fact we talk what an awesome season Button apparently had and what a poor one Hamilton is meant to have had... yet Button only had 40 odd points more in the end and the same number of race wins.

If Button can out do Hamilton again this season then I will defo have changed my mind about him but I still don't think Button is all that. Great when everything is going his way....

Regarding comparing Hamilton to Senna it is certainly not laughable... Its more than a decent comparison. Driving style is very similar and he as raw pace not many drivers have. Regarding talent levels, well we can talk about that in years to come when we have more to go off. Just like Senna he is VERY quick in qaulifying and is prone to doing something rash.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Which begs the question, will Bernie really make more money from them?

He already has

Bernie might have in the short term, but whether it's sustainable in the long term is another thing.

Companies pay huge amounts of money to be splattered all over the cars. If they're getting 3/4 less exposure in one of the biggest markets they're not going to keep paying at the same rates as they've been paying.

The test is going to be the numbers of viewers the live races have on the beeb. If there's a significant fall - and I suspect there will be, cos people won't be as interested in watching half of something - then those sponsors are going to kick off, which will cause the teams to kick off, which will cause Bernie to back down on doing another deal with Sky.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The test is going to be the numbers of viewers the live races have on the beeb. If there's a significant fall - and I suspect there will be, cos people won't be as interested in watching half of something - then those sponsors are going to kick off, which will cause the teams to kick off, which will cause Bernie to back down on doing another deal with Sky.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Bernie (and the venture capitalists that own F1) only care about the short term... and only needs to care about the short term...

If it didn't suit like you said he would just do another deal with Beeb or some other free to air provider...

While Bernie is going to kick it soon and has made his mint and so might not care, those vulture capitalists will - they'll want a return on their investment, and the sky deal risks them not having much of one.

And while the Beeb would probably have it back, it's defo the case they'd only have it back at a very reduced price. It was the huge price they were paying that caused them to give up that contract mid-way thru, and luckily their desire to save that money was permitted by Bernie cos the deal with sky meant the broadcast contract was worth more overall.

But all of that is based just on the broadcasting rights. None of it is influenced directly by the sponsors, who sponsor to get their name seen by eyeballs. If the viewer-numbers are significantly down they're going to kick off big time, and the result will be less money from broadcasting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

McLaren's tyre calls also goosed Hamilton, why do they always leave them out a lap too late, they should have had him in the lap before Button, not the one after it, he lost masses of time out there on shite tyres that put him out behind Peres, better to get him early and have to do the laps on shite tyres at the end, when it would not trust him track position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Those venture capitalists won't be looking for a return in 10 years time... They will want a return ASAP.. Hence the current talk of stock flotations and reserved amounts going to some of the teams and so forth...

Neither Bernie of the Capitalists give a shit about the health of F1 in 10/20 years time...

isn't capitalism great? :lol:

But what I will add on is the future of F1 isn't in Britain... we already know this by exploitation of new markets over European markets...

Except some of them are already baulking at the costs, as is Spain. It's starting to look as tho F1 is over-priced for it's real audience - rather than its hoped-for one - and it's certainly the case that viewers in the 'wealthy' old world are worth far more than viewers in the emerging economies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i paid 53 euros for a 3 day ticket for Monza a few years back (vettels first win)

can get some really good prices for european races.... although i would pay extra for a grandstand especially at Monza ... not alot of viewing places

i won tickets to spa about 10 years ago .... so not sure on the price for that :P but loads of decent viewing places for a bronze ticket

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought that when the Sky deal was first announced the general consensus on here was that it wouldn't matter to the sponsors, because the loss of viewers in the UK would be such a small percentage of the global total, particularly compared to those in the emerging markets... what's changed?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That doesn't stand up to scrutiny though. Practice 1, 2, 3 and qualifying in 2011/2012 started at the exact same time and the races were only an hour apart so time clearly makes no difference.. Also if you read the Guardian report it states "Sunday's audience figures included viewers who recorded it and watched it later in the day – as did the BBC1 figures for 2011." so that's also the same, only thing is less people have Sky which leads me to...

...the above being what I was getting at.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fact is though the lead car gets priority...

I think its a crap idea... The teams should be maximising their chances... But if that is the agreement you have to stick to it I suppose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
    • We had a really good weekend this year. This was our 2nd year after giving it a go last year with 3 year old twins (we do Glasto but don't take the kids and have no plans to in the distant future!!).   Highlights of the weekend for me was Peter Hook & the Light, English Teacher, Flaming Lips, Adult DVD and Alex James (I get the karaoke thing but I still thought it was great). Missed loads of acts we wanted to see due to having two kids in tow but overall we left happy with what we managed to see across the weekend. Some great food vendors, good to see Steak Frites make an appearance this year, one of my faves from Glasto. Festival is really well run, toilets remained clean and stocked with loo roll all weekend, even on Sunday night/Monday morning. The walk from the cars is a ballache but it is what it is, arriving Thursday evening meant we were parked as far away as you could be.   My only gripe is that there seems to be a trend of parents letting their teenagers camp completely separately to them in family camping. We had a large group of 15-17 year olds near us who came home pissed up every evening at 3-4am being really loud and annoying! I get that it's a festival etc but I think it's taking the piss a bit letting your kids camp separately and disrupt everyone else.   All in all we had a really good time and are looking forward to next year.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...