Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Football 2011-2012


Guest eFestivals

Recommended Posts

Maiga signing fallen through. Failed a medical apparently.

Shame, I think he would have been a good signing. But if he is going to spend all his time on the operating table, there's not much point. Hope we've got someone else lined up though....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 8.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • eFestivals

    1469

  • The Nal

    1095

  • kaosmark2

    1095

  • strummer77

    896

  • Admin

Though for the record I'm quite interested in seeing why you think WHU get bigger attendances when they're winning.

From what you said, and from nothing else.

If you're 'amazed' (as you said) at the attendances they're getting, then there's a reason why you're amazed.

We both can recognise (from what both of us have already posted) that teams who are generally winning are more likely to attract a bigger crowd than they would if generally losing. I put your amazement down to that fact but you not applying that fact to WHU.

It is a fact mind, that some clubs core support is stronger than others, and the percentage drop off of supporters at some clubs are much lower than others when performing badly.

Compare say Leeds and WHU as clubs I have already mentioned, against the likes of Villa and Everton and it's clear what I mean.

yep, some clubs have fewer glory hunters, but they'll still have some - which is why we're both able to recognise that teams who are generally winning are more likely to attract a bigger crowd than they would if generally losing.

You have indicated that you dismiss that factor for WHU from your considerations, at least to some extent.

So why are you amazed? Both enough to think I'm strange for pointing out the obvious, and to be amazed at the size of crowd in the first place?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Which is incorrect - WHU attendances this season are (very slightly) down on last season - yet we're winning a lot more games this season than last.

but you're also playing in a less fashionable league, so the drop is easily explained by West Ham losing fashionista supporters (who, for a club such as West Ham who are unlikely to be winning things, are much the same as Man Utd's glory hunters).

There's fans coming to see West Ham when they're in the Prem who are really coming to see their opposition - but that's probably a factor to some extent for all Prem clubs from 7th downwards I reckon (and perhaps even some above 7th).

I guess amazed was too strong a word. I am surprised at the loyalty given the performances and cost.

Would the fall you mention above be greater if they were also doing shit on the pitch?

Given the facts of football, it's certain that the fall would be greater if they weren't getting the results, unless WHU only has a unique type of fan - but which the facts of the fall in numbers when in the Champs gets to prove they don't.

My perception is that due to the fact that getting a ticket is easier (in the sense that matches aren't sold out weeks in advance) than it was last season, there are more 'day trippers' coming this season.

then that's a good thing for West Ham and suggests they have a rosy fan-future. :)

There are less 'regulars' at each home game this season, than there were last season, even if the size of the crowd come match day is the same or close to the size of the crowds last season and in previous seasons before that.

Then I'd guess that you also regard that as a good thing because they 'regulars' you'll be likely to have lost are the fashionistas, glory hunters and those who come to watch the opposition and not West Ham. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

but you're also playing in a less fashionable league, so the drop is easily explained by West Ham losing fashionista supporters (who, for a club such as West Ham who are unlikely to be winning things, are much the same as Man Utd's glory hunters).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

We've had this discussion before and I didn't agree with you then. Besides which, that argument would still be true (if it were in the first instance) for the top 6 clubs - unless you think Man Utd supporters get as excited by the visit of Wigan as they do Citeh or Liverpool...

while that's true (after all, I'm sure every Utd fan would rather watch them play City than Wigan), there's less flexibility for their crowds just by the fact that just about every game against the lowly or the high sells out.

Perhaps not...not if the move to the OS goes ahead...

that I guess will depend on what proportion of the crowd are less interested in the footie than they are the surroundings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Safe standing campaign slowly but surely gaining momentum...

The Scottish Premier League will consider requests to pilot safe-standing areas. The SPL announced a relaxation of their rules on standing following a general meeting of all 12 clubs on Monday.

Neil Doncaster, chief executive of the SPL, said: "Since I joined the SPL in 2009, there has been widespread support amongst fans to reintroduce safe standing areas. "I am delighted that we have been able to respond positively to supporters' views on improving the match day experience."

Scotland is not bound by the law which banned standing areas in top-flight football in England, which came in to force after the Taylor Report into the Hillsborough disaster in 1989.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

If WHU move into the OS in 2014, I fully expect attendances in 2016/17 to be worse than they currently are in the Boleyn.

I guess I'we been living under the misapprehwension that footie fans like football but clearly I'm wrong. :lol:

Actually, I've always known that's wrong - you only have to consider the standard club fan who only has interest in their club.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess I'we been living under the misapprehwension that footie fans like football but clearly I'm wrong. :lol:

Actually, I've always known that's wrong - you only have to consider the standard club fan who only has interest in their club.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure Lawton's always excellent. He wrote one of the weirdest articles I'd ever seen. He stated categorically that Dalglish and Hodgson's records were similar before producing the following stats. Stats which actually contradicted his argument. Here's that section.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • In 2024, Dua and Coldplay had B stages and they were dismantled and rebuilt overnight to suit both acts. 
    • UK to strip back procurement rules to focus on job creation, says Louise Haigh https://www.ft.com/content/9878a2e4-3ac5-43b0-b2c9-b1fe1a4b65e7?syn-25a6b1a6=1   Burnham is not serious about tackling climate change. Having conditions on govt contractors is one of the easiest ways to drive standards and behaviour.
    • Basement Jaxx 110 (-10) Billy Bragg 90 Chase & Status 150 MAX CMAT 150 MAX  Confidence Man 140 David Byrne 150 MAX Everything Everything 130  Faithless 65 Fatboy Slim 100 Four Tet 130  Garbage 120  GOAT 30 Greentea Peng 125  Joy Crookes 110  Kneecap 115 Lorde 150 MAX The Maccabees 125 Nile Rodgers & Chic 150 MAX The Prodigy 150 MAX Pulp 150 MAX RAYE 70  Richard Ashcroft 110  Scissor Sisters 110  Self Esteem 140  The Streets 100  Super Furry Animals 100 Underworld 150 MAX Wolf Alice 150 MAX
    • What is too old for Leeds Fest now ?  I'm going to the Fontaines Saturday in a few weeks at 54 !!!  I may be the oldest there 🙂    Wythenshawe may be an option for WA.
    • Pretty much all festivals lose out on major artists because of production limitations though. Glastonbury is no different to most other festivals.  Lots of acts can/will adapt their tour production to suit festival stages if they want to play them, but some acts with stage designs and routines just don't want to adapt, and would rather just stick with a rigid, well-rehearsed production and take the money for their own gigs, whether that's a lot more than playing Glastonbury, or slightly less than playing some other festivals (but with added complications). Trying to adapt the stage, layout, access to b-stages etc to accommodate a single headliner on a Friday and then having to change it all around for a Saturday headliner isn't really a goer when most headliners can just easily adapt their show to stay on a main stage, if they're so inclined. They have a year to figure out how to perform a song on a main stage and ditch a few dance routines out on a b-stage if they really put their mind to it. It's not that difficult......
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...