Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Football 2011-2012


Guest eFestivals

Recommended Posts

  • Admin

Racism is about attitudes though.

is it? :blink:

Is Jim Davidson being racist when he talks about his fictitious black 'mate' called Chalky? He'd say he wasn't because "I don't mean anything nasty by it", yet if black people are offended by it, who's to say they're wrong in believing him racist?

Just consider the recent fuss about the caddy and his comment about Tiger Woods who he used to caddy for. His words were something like "I'd like to shove this award up Tiger's black arse".

Tiger has an arse that's black, so from that angle it's definitely factual. But from another angle, the colour of his arse has naff all to do with anything about what he'd like to do with the award trophy, so why bring race into it? ;)

He might have offended someone without trying to be offensive, but that is very very different to being racist.

I disagree completely.

He might not have meant to be racially offensive, but that doesn't mean he's not been racially offensive.

It's increased by one, not doubled!

if the ban being appealed against is a one matcher, it's being doubled!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 8.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • eFestivals

    1469

  • The Nal

    1095

  • kaosmark2

    1095

  • strummer77

    896

I'm probably not phrasing myself badly. I'm actually someone who is quite PC, very liberal but this is such a complicated issue that it's very hard to write about/sympathise about without sounding like you completely misunderstand racism. With that disclaimer in mind, here I go...

is it? :blink:

Is Jim Davidson being racist when he talks about his fictitious black 'mate' called Chalky? He'd say he wasn't because "I don't mean anything nasty by it", yet if black people are offended by it, who's to say they're wrong in believing him racist?

Edited by strummer77
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Racism is about attitudes.

I'd say you're failing to differentiate between 'being racist' and 'a racist'.

'A racist' is deliberately racist. Anyone can 'be racist', whether meaning to be or not.

Suarez is charged with 'being racist', not 'being a racist'. What he thinks his words were are not necessarily what they were.

Given the cultural differences - there's three different ones involved (Uruagrian, French, and British) - it's going to be mightily difficult to unravel and rule on I reckon, and which ever way they lean it's likely that some will think the wrong decision has been made, and for substantive reasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd say so. Although I cant imagine either Manc club playing anything but the Carling Cup teams in it.

"You'll win nothing with kids" is true this time out. Not enough experience. They'll learn though. Very young players in key positions. The lack of Scholes last night was obvious for all to see. Utd very limited. No creativity in the centre of the park. Everything goes out wide now. Predictable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

you would really like united to go tit up wouldnt you?

but we all know it isnt going to happen.

No, I don't want them to go tits up. I'd much prefer they were financially sound.

But they're not, and you reap what you sow. An unavoidable settlement day will come around at some point, and they'll be in the shit.

It's no less easy to recognise than what has happened with the banks and with countries - tho only a few people saw what was coming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Yes indeed but Utd are in a much better state on a % pay vs turnover scale anyway.

yup, they are - but it still hinders.

More of a worry I'd say is the effect on profits, because they're of big importance towards staving off settlement day - something that's only been managed so far by taking an overly rosey view of things.

I'm more worried about the football though. Really would've liked to seen the younger lads at Utd play a couple of big Champo League games. Its a transitional year and the lack of Champo League is going to stunt their development somewhat.

I'm not sure that side of things is as big a deal as you're seeing it - depending on what approach the club takes towards the Europa. It gives the opportunity to blood players who wouldn't otherwise get a look in with Euro football, which will have it's own future benefits.

Was really hoping Utd would become a complete team by next season. Only really Spurs and maybe City can say that at the moment.

I wouldn't worry too much about Spurs - they've got 'Arry in charge don't forget.

And City are out of sight already. You're going to have to get used to that one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure that side of things is as big a deal as you're seeing it - depending on what approach the club takes towards the Europa. It gives the opportunity to blood players who wouldn't otherwise get a look in with Euro football, which will have it's own future benefits.

Edited by The Nal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

True, the very fringe players like ravel Morrison, Pogba etc. But the concern I have is players like Smalling, Jones, De Gea, Hernandez, Rafael, Fabio etc who Ferguson would’ve wanted as experienced first teamers by August. Theres a huge difference between playing against Xavi, Iniesta, Alonso, Ronaldo, Higuain, Nesta etc and playing away in Cyprus on a bumpy pitch against a load of apprentice butchers.

there's a big difference, yep ... tho you might get to play some of the best down the road. :P

And anyway, I'd say that there's probably more value and useful experience gained "playing away in Cyprus on a bumpy pitch against a load of apprentice butchers" than there is playing a game where you barely get to touch the ball.

I get you, but it could come back to bite you Neil, they’ve a great starting 11 and a good squad.

yup, it might bite me on the arse, I know.

But I reckon I'm safer going with 'Arry's record over many seasons than I am with what has always proven to be a flakey Spurs team that have got their act together for just half of one.

Plus 'Arry's going dowwwwnnnn.

For all their 6-1, 5 nils etc, they’re not. Only 5 points clear. And Utd having being playing well, Spurs had a crap start, as did Chelski and Arsenal. Its not over yet. City have some tough games coming up too in comparison to the chasing pack.

That's not really what I was getting at. I accept that Utd might yet over-haul City this season (tho I personally doubt it).

I was meaning more in the longer term. They're gone, and there's nothing that Utd can do to keep close.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...