Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2013 Headliners


Guest shangri-la_steward

Recommended Posts

  • Admin
you said he was sloppy. Not liking him, or the songs he did etc is subjective and just opinion. The fact that he wasn't sloppy isn't open to opinion. You might as well say it was raining all weekend, because that's how it seemed to you.
sloppy - as in "not tight". What I saw was not tight.

If you think different then the difference in our opinions is our subjective difference of opinion of what is tight.

Sloppy or not is opinion. It can't be anything else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 11.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

sloppy - as in "not tight". What I saw was not tight.

If you think different then the difference in our opinions is our subjective difference of opinion of what is tight.

Sloppy or not is opinion. It can't be anything else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Springsteen is one of the most boring acts I've ever had the displeasure to sit though. He's live show is a steaming pile of horse crap! And not only is he as dull as a train spotter I hate the over-enthusiastic 'MERICA!!!!!' shit that goes with he's show. I went to IOW and I wanted to see Ash and the darkness but was determined to see half hour of bruce. Me and my friends struggled to stick it out till half hour, I was counting down the seconds over the last few minutes. One of my mates was chatting about Bruce all weekend and how he couldn't wait to see him and left before we did! Truly terrible performer!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
do you think playing the right notes at the right time is a matter of opinion?
nope. But I do think that what-is-the-right-time could well be.

The fact remains: I've heard plenty of tighter bands over the years.

No matter what you say, that opinion of mine remains the same, and there's no fact you can present to change it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

nope. But I do think that what-is-the-right-time could well be.

The fact remains: I've heard plenty of tighter bands over the years.

No matter what you say, that opinion of mine remains the same, and there's no fact you can present to change it.

Edited by tonyblair
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heard some rumblings that Daft Punk were going to do Coachella, then decided they wanted to do a reunion/comeback kinda thing in France before playing anywhere else this year. Coachella is in April, so... Potentially a world tour starting in France after April coming from them? A tour that might include a Glastonbury slot?

*grasps all the straws he can find*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
what do you mean "what is the right time"? you think you know more than the musicians when the right time is?
From a personal enjoyment perspective, yes.

There's bands where (say) the drummer is that split-second before the rest of the band and there's those where he's that split-second after, which helps define the sound of that band. There is no definitive 'right', it's how that musician feels its right. Someone listening might feel it's wrong, because that choice of that drummer doesn't create a feel that that listener likes. The first job of the drummer is to give a consistent beat, but there's no requirement with that that everyone in the band is 100% on the same moment with that drummer's beat (and it doesn't ever happen, that level of perfection does not exist in any band outside of the synthesised).

If a person doesn't enjoy the 'disconnect make-up' of that particular set of musicians then he's perfectly entitled to think those musicians have got it wrong, just by the fact it doesn't work for him.

But I don't think any of this is particularly relevant for my SW opinion. The band simply wasn't that tight for what I heard of the set; I've heard plenty tighter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
Heard some rumblings that Daft Punk were going to do Coachella, then decided they wanted to do a reunion/comeback kinda thing in France before playing anywhere else this year. Coachella is in April, so... Potentially a world tour starting in France after April coming from them? A tour that might include a Glastonbury slot?

*grasps all the straws he can find*

it's straws. They were never doing Coachella.

There might be some other straws to clutch soonish tho. More when it's available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And not only is he as dull as a train spotter I hate the over-enthusiastic 'MERICA!!!!!' shit that goes with he's show.[/quoute

As someone of a pretty strident anti-imperialist bent, I find Springsteen's shows to feature about 0% mindless flag-waving. If anything, it's the opposite. He's even got Tom Morello as a semi-permanent member of The E Street band.

Neil Diamond, on the other hand.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was in the "Stevie can't pull it off" camp before he played.

About 5 minutes in I realised I was spectacularly wrong. His band are utterly incredible. One of the best I've seen.

From 8 mins 50. Doesn't get any tighter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man I wish Biffy Clyro weren't booked for what is probably a UK exclusive headline spot at R&L.

New albums are brilliant, they've worked their way up the Glasto bill and would be a genuinely deserving headliner, always put on a fantastic show and would be a great choice by the Eavis' for the Friday night upcoming headliner spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There were a few noodly areas in Stevie's set that could perhaps have been edited out, e.g. his keytar solo at the start, but I'd call them 'cheesy' rather than 'sloppy'.

On the whole, though, it was incredible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
I'm intrigued to see or hear an example of their sloppiness.
One of the things neither of us have touched on around this, and what it could be down to, is where we were stood in the field and how that was effected by the sound set-up.

It's possibly that, I dunno. The fact remains that it didn't sound tight to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man I wish Biffy Clyro weren't booked for what is probably a UK exclusive headline spot at R&L.

New albums are brilliant, they've worked their way up the Glasto bill and would be a genuinely deserving headliner, always put on a fantastic show and would be a great choice by the Eavis' for the Friday night upcoming headliner spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the things neither of us have touched on around this, and what it could be down to, is where we were stood in the field and how that was effected by the sound set-up.

It's possibly that, I dunno. The fact remains that it didn't sound tight to me.

Edited by tonyblair
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been in front of the pyramid where the sound can be a nightmare. Do they still try and do that thing with the speakers further back, where they attempt to simulate the real delay from the pa on the stage? So that - in theory - if you're standing near the second lot of speakers, the sound you're hearing from those speakers has a delay to match the natural delay...? (if you get my meaning). That only works in certain 'sweet' spots. I remember wandering around when REM were on, and in some places there was an unlistenable 'echo', but if you walked a few feet either way, the echo disappeared. It's one of the main reasons I like to get a good spot for someone I like, it's as much about the sound as being able to see
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been in front of the pyramid where the sound can be a nightmare. Do they still try and do that thing with the speakers further back, where they attempt to simulate the real delay from the pa on the stage? So that - in theory - if you're standing near the second lot of speakers, the sound you're hearing from those speakers has a delay to match the natural delay...? (if you get my meaning). That only works in certain 'sweet' spots. I remember wandering around when REM were on, and in some places there was an unlistenable 'echo', but if you walked a few feet either way, the echo disappeared. It's one of the main reasons I like to get a good spot for someone I like, it's as much about the sound as being able to see
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Ann and Nancy Wilson are planning a final world tour for HEART starting next year. They were never at Glastonbury. They should do it. 
    • sub yes I could see but I don't think they get 1hr 15, a headliner starting at 18:15 though is unlikely. Even the recent co-headlines that have had like 1hr 15 then a 1hr 30 after were on 8pm or just before, you are trailing behind more than 1.5 hours then. In that scenario some 3rd down bands are only starting at 18:15 and some haven't lol. I agree they won't not book them due to this but it won't be 6 headliners. It would be 5 headliners and you wouldn't want to see 5 headliners booked but Biffy were to not be thouhgt of as an option for one. Wolf Alice on the other hand could sub no bother and you'd think nothing of it. I'm not so sure Biffy would get headline though after the festival choice in Kendal this year.
    • Definitely. UKIP also used Merkel welcoming 1 million Afgans to Europe in 2015 during the brexit vote.   Politicians in other countries within the EU know the are going to lose voters to parties to the right of them over stuff like this and they've no control over it.
    • I think it will very much vary on who there is to book who they know will sell out a day.    They’ve co-headline and full headline stuff in future, there no reason at all they won’t do it again, even if it means cutting someone’s set by 15 mins or having a band less in a big bands day…   They’re not going to not book Foo fighters and instead get the equivalent of Florence and C&S just to not have a band do a big set…   …unless of course they think it will make them more money…
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...