Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

news & politics:discussion


zahidf

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

hardly surprising it's popular...

everyone hates free money. 😛 

Edited by Neil
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Neil said:

everyone hates free money. 😛 

It’s not really free money it’s letting people keep more of their own money. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ozanne said:

It’s not really free money it’s letting people keep more of their own money. 

as an exchange for doing things differently to the norm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

 

That’s not entirely true, they are still proposing to keep the support for low income families and pensioners. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Ozanne said:

That’s not entirely true, they are still proposing to keep the support for low income families and pensioners. 

His argument is that wealthier households should be using less energy and higher prices helps with that, same problem as Sunak's £400 for everyone. It's very expensive despite the inflation fiddle thing, and what happens if prices remain high after next March?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

His argument is that wealthier households should be using less energy and higher prices helps with that, same problem as Sunak's £400 for everyone. It's very expensive despite the inflation fiddle thing, and what happens if prices remain high after next March?

Then we tax the energy firms they are rich enough to absorb the cost.

His arguments is wrong when the bills are going to be up to around £4k.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, steviewevie said:

 It's very expensive despite the inflation fiddle thing, and what happens if prices remain high after next March?

You'd think the Tories would use it as an attack line that labour would of added £60bn to the national debt but I'm not sure its going to hit home after they've just added £400bn during covid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, lost said:

You'd think the Tories would use it as an attack line that labour would of added £60bn to the national debt but I'm not sure its going to hit home after they've just added £400bn during covid.

I don't think people are as bothered anymore, austerity + pandemic have changed the mindset.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

I don't think people are as bothered anymore, austerity + pandemic have changed the mindset.

Indeed. We'd actually need to see the consequences a la Greece and Italy etc.. We do have the weakest pound since 1985 and the worst trade deficit in history but the results of those can be blamed on other things. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ozanne said:

Then we tax the energy firms they are rich enough to absorb the cost.

His arguments is wrong when the bills are going to be up to around £4k.

not sure the energy firms that can be taxed here are rich enough, windfall taxes only partly pay for this. Labour's policy is similar to Sunak's £400 for everyone, except it's now £1000 or thereabouts for everyone, even the super duper rich like me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

not sure the energy firms that can be taxed here are rich enough, windfall taxes only partly pay for this. Labour's policy is similar to Sunak's £400 for everyone, except it's now £1000 or thereabouts for everyone, even the super duper rich like me.

It’s nothing like Sunak’s policy, this one is cancelling the cap rise and keeping bills at the current level which also gives families some certainty over bill rather than what there is now. Sunak would wait for bills to rise then give people money.

They can tax the energy firms that do business in the UK. Unless you care more about massive corporations than you do working families of course. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/3/2022 at 1:47 PM, Neil said:

i can't believe that roy hackett isn't more widely celebrated, his actions have impacted on every non-white in the uk. there should be a roy hacket day. 🙂  he';s well celebrated in bristol.

 

th?id=OIP.bBidMwD18LGTCRnL3dtmRQHaGA&pid

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

It’s nothing like Sunak’s policy, this one is cancelling the cap rise and keeping bills at the current level which also gives families some certainty over bill rather than what there is now. Sunak would wait for bills to rise then give people money.

They can tax the energy firms that do business in the UK. Unless you care more about massive corporations than you do working families of course. 

no, I just mean tax is not going to raise the £30billion required, which is why Starmer saying only part of this will be funded by windfall taxes. And I meant similar to Sunak's £400 thing in that it benefits everyone, not just the poorest...that is what that bloke on Guardian was arguing. Guardian leader on other hand broadly praises it...

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/aug/15/the-guardian-view-on-keir-starmers-bills-freeze-smart-politics-needs-smart-economics

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

only part of this will be funded by windfall taxes

the energy companies won't be making profits big enough to pay for the energy at the public's end, they'll be selling high because they'll be buying high.

Edited by Neil
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Christ didn't even see that! 
    • It does feel very bland. It would certainly spell another year (my third, I think) away from Pyramid headliners for me. That doesn't mean they aren't worthy, though. I don't follow what any of them are up to, as it isn't my thing. Good luck to them.   You would think coming off a fallow year, they would want one big hitter. 'Big hitter' is obviously open to debate, but that was/is Madonna. Let's have it right. The eggs have gone in that basket, and it seems (as far the rumours go) that it's blown up. So now you're left with another plan B/replacement headliner.   I'm still of the opinion that Oasis will do it, before the Oasis thing is all said and done. Probably 2028, if they can come to an agreement. It may transpire that 2027 is bland (or at least to some of us), and 2028 is a bit... wild.   Again, though, none of us categorically know ANY of the headliners, as it stands.
    • Second go.....    Still f**king fantastic - Well done WIlliam Orbit -  Bugman & Trimm Trabb mega tracks - No Distance Left To Run hauntingly Beautiful  
    • Just realised it was 13 he produced not this one DOH!!!!   
    • Sad news ,some great music and obviously some great producing. Will be sorely missed
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...