Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

news & politics:discussion


zahidf

Recommended Posts

On 11/30/2023 at 11:12 AM, steviewevie said:

May looking less likely again?

Jan 2025 I reckon

There's needs to be a reason why things would be better by delaying. No one can see why things will improve for the Tories 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Neil said:

There's needs to be a reason why things would be better by delaying. No one can see why things will improve for the Tories 

Yeah, probably not...so they will have to calculate whether to go for it in the spring when still 20 points behind, or wait and hope economy picks up enough or a flight leaves for Rwanda or something unexpected happens to narrow the polls.

Edited by steviewevie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Neil said:

There's needs to be a reason why things would be better by delaying. No one can see why things will improve for the Tories 

The longer they delay the more money can be shuffled out of the countries cash reserves and into their offshore accounts 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see Scotland are sending the pandas home as another strategy for indy is seen to have failed. Pandas are worth spending money on, Scots - not so much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting article on labours plans for the NHS:

Quote

If we just pour ever-increasing amounts of taxpayer money into a broken system, we will continue to get worse health outcomes than other leading economies. And I genuinely fear for the future sustainability of the NHS in that situation.

the NHS is already soaking up 44 per cent of government spending.

International league tables show that Australia’s health services outperform those of the UK on a wealth of measures: life expectancy, mortality from cancer, heart attacks and strokes among them.

it achieves this while spending significantly less on health, at 9.6 per cent of GDP compared with the UK’s 11.3 per cent,

 

Edited by lost
Link to comment
Share on other sites

even if oz has the answer labour won't be allowed to do it, because any nhs change is setting it up to be sold off in the minds of the closed minds.

there are many  improvements that can be made and fixing them is often stopped by the obstructionists.

eg: bristol has contracted some stuff out to charities who are now delivering services that the nhs never provided. obstructionists : "no contracting out!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Neil said:

even if oz has the answer labour won't be allowed to do it, because any nhs change is setting it up to be sold off in the minds of the closed minds.

there are many  improvements that can be made and fixing them is often stopped by the obstructionists.

eg: bristol has contracted some stuff out to charities who are now delivering services that the nhs never provided. obstructionists : "no contracting out!"

I have the answer to many things 😉

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • People seem to have got obsessed about 'secret sets' at all festivals this year even when there aren't any spaces other than, in EOTR's case, the usual late Folly sets that 90%+ of the time are from artists who are already playing. And if it is someone else, I'm sure it won't be a band who played the festival last year.
    • To be fair @Superscally barely mentions the running thing. Very quiet about it 😘
    • I guess we'll just have to wait until videos of the shows go up, but the fact that the standing is also greyed out still suggests to me that those sections just sold out out before the others and a blue block just be like 3 tickets left, it's still not concrete proof they never went on sale and if they were never on sale why would they not make it even, if 414 wasn't on sale then you'd think 409 wouldn't be either   
    • Selfish, but I've done the 2 days I'm there.. i'll try to do the rest through the day but might get beaten to it as it's editable....    https://clashfinder.com/s/ape2026/
    • I don’t think the festival automatically ‘need’ to have a female headliner if you have strong female headliners on the Other Stage (which I reckon will be Rosalia and Phoebe Bridgers), perhaps a female legend (praying for Annie, will take Cher), and a few female/mix gendered subs on the Pyramid (maybe London Grammar, The xx). From what I’ve seen of Sabrina, her team prioritises the pay day and I think she will be doing Wembley over Glasto weekend.   One thing I’ve noticed is a lot of the suggestions would be first time headliners and I can’t work out when the last time was that the festival had three artists top the bill that hadn’t topped it before? It seems to be something they like to do to make sure they have a ‘safe’ headliner that will land well with the masses. Plenty of names in that hat that could step back up next summer and should/could be about: Billie Eilish, Adele, Foo Fighters, The Cure, Radiohead, U2…hell, if Beyoncé is really planning to release a ‘rock n roll’ album to complete her Renaissance trilogy, Glastonbury would be a great place to ‘kick off’ that campaign for her.   And there’s always the Rihanna rumour. Her husband (I think) said this week she’s in the studio.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...