Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

news & politics:discussion


zahidf

Recommended Posts

It's actually crazy how spectacularly the Tories have managed to screw the economy since Friday. It is also crazy how this government already seems to be done but realistically won't be removed for another 2 years as it has only been a few weeks. There is no mechanism for us to get rid of them either, despite the fact that this iteration of the Tories are enacting policies that are absolutely miles away from the manifesto on which they were elected. Serious questions for our 'democracy'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, lost said:

Less than half the amount we spent on Covid tests? Yeah ok If you believe that I've got a bridge to sell you. 😆

Literally all the economists say it’s the unfunded tax cuts or at least that’s the main reason but continue to try to defend the Tories. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

Literally all the economists say it’s the unfunded tax cuts or at least that’s the main reason but continue to try to defend the Tories. 

Its not defending the Tories its understanding that one number is bigger than another.

The Tories are fucked anyway as they are holding the parcel when the music stopped.

Edited by lost
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, lost said:

Its not defending the Tories its understanding that one number is bigger than another.

Then all the economists must be wrong and a staunch Tory defender is right.

It’s ok to admit that funnelling more money to rich isn’t a good policy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ozanne said:

Then all the economists must be wrong and a staunch Tory defender is right.

Not all. Some said exactly this would happen back in June when Boris was still there and before the tax cuts were announced:

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, zahidf said:

'We need to cancel the energy cap to fund tax cuts for the rich'

 

Yeah that'll sell politically.

Maybe they suspect they are on the way out so will redistribute as much to the rich as possible before they go. Considering they blamed labour for years last time, I assume they will take responsibility this time?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, lost said:

Not all. Some said exactly this would happen back in June when Boris was still there and before the tax cuts were announced:

 

 

The tax cuts were announced though and all this then did happen.

I wondered how the Tory boys would be handling all this and apparently the answer is, not very well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ozanne said:

 

I wondered how the Tory boys would be handling all this and apparently the answer is, not very well. 

You know your exactly the same as a Corbynista accusing anyone with a different opinion on anything as a Tory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, lost said:

You know your exactly the same as a Corbynista accusing anyone with a different opinion on anything as a Tory.

Deflection. Tory tactic 101.

You can’t deflect from this shit show that the Tories have unleashed on us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, steviewevie said:

I have been round the block a few times and I still don't really understand all this gilts/bonds thing.

Its actually a throw back to Robert Maxwell. When he fiddled the mirror pension fund rules were put in place forcing them to hold a certain amount of long dated government debt to stop it happening again.

The value of a bond is inversely proportional to the yield so as interest rates rise the value falls. If the value of a pension fund falls below a certain amount where by its judged it can't meet its liabilities (the pensions it has to pay out) its gets a margin call where the owner/company has to top it up back to that value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, lost said:

Its actually a throw back to Robert Maxwell. When he fiddled the mirror pension fund rules were put in place forcing them to hold a certain amount of long dated government debt to stop it happening again.

The value of a bond is inversely proportional to the yield so as interest rates rise the value falls. If the value of a pension fund falls below a certain amount where by its judged it can't meet its liabilities (the pensions it has to pay out) its gets a margin call where the owner/company has to top it up back to that value.

errr..ok, thanks. 🥴

I actually did Economics A level...a long long time ago...and I failed with a N (i think it was an N)...and then I retook the following November and failed with a U (worse than an N). Happy days.

(I also took Maths, got an E, very appropriate...and retook in November and got a U! 😃)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

errr..ok, thanks. 🥴

I actually did Economics A level...a long long time ago...and I failed with a N (i think it was an N)...and then I retook the following November and failed with a U (worse than an N). Happy days.

(I also took Maths, got an E, very appropriate...and retook in November and got a U! 😃)

You just need a C and a T in there too 😉

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • I guess we'll just have to wait until videos of the shows go up, but the fact that the standing is also greyed out still suggests to me that those sections just sold out out before the others and a blue block just be like 3 tickets left, it's still not concrete proof they never went on sale and if they were never on sale why would they not make it even, if 414 wasn't on sale then you'd think 409 wouldn't be either   
    • Selfish, but I've done the 2 days I'm there.. i'll try to do the rest through the day but might get beaten to it as it's editable....    https://clashfinder.com/s/ape2026/
    • I don’t think the festival automatically ‘need’ to have a female headliner if you have strong female headliners on the Other Stage (which I reckon will be Rosalia and Phoebe Bridgers), perhaps a female legend (praying for Annie, will take Cher), and a few female/mix gendered subs on the Pyramid (maybe London Grammar, The xx). From what I’ve seen of Sabrina, her team prioritises the pay day and I think she will be doing Wembley over Glasto weekend.   One thing I’ve noticed is a lot of the suggestions would be first time headliners and I can’t work out when the last time was that the festival had three artists top the bill that hadn’t topped it before? It seems to be something they like to do to make sure they have a ‘safe’ headliner that will land well with the masses. Plenty of names in that hat that could step back up next summer and should/could be about: Billie Eilish, Adele, Foo Fighters, The Cure, Radiohead, U2…hell, if Beyoncé is really planning to release a ‘rock n roll’ album to complete her Renaissance trilogy, Glastonbury would be a great place to ‘kick off’ that campaign for her.   And there’s always the Rihanna rumour. Her husband (I think) said this week she’s in the studio.
    • And all (or all but one) of the secret sets repeats though?
    • 1. Coming with my sister (our 4th Sziget together) 2. 3 days (Thursday-Saturday). Would rather do Tuesday-Thursday but not enough AL 😞 3. Wednesday evening  4. Apartment  5. FATM (will be my 10th Florence’s gig) 6. Parcels/Paris Paloma
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...