Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

US Presidential Election 2016


zero000

Recommended Posts

  • Admin
1 minute ago, feral chile said:

What about narrative around events then?

We've been told repeatedly that we can't afford to spend, and suddenly brexit means we can/have to:

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/23/world/europe/uk-philip-hammond-autumn-statement-brexit.html?_r=0

To be fair to the tories, the situation today is very different to how it was in May 2010, so while they abused the situation to their advantage, harsher measures were required back then to what might be done now.

Beyond that the speed at which the deficit is reduced is a political choice, tho not a free one. It's still something that has to be done (rather than can be put back forever), and the sooner it's done the less money is spent on servicing & repaying debt into the future.

Even McDonnell says he'll reduce the deficit - tho he's only pretending cos he'll be doing it with the money he prints.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Admin
14 hours ago, zahidf said:

Castro: I will not die until America is destroyed


Trump: I'm gonna be the president


Castro: well then

:lol:

Meanwhile, which of the two has clocked up the most murdering of political opponents?

Something for you to think over. :)

(Just to be clear, I'm not suggesting that Castro was Stalin, but neither are his hands entirely clean)

 

Edited by eFestivals
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, eFestivals said:

:lol:

Meanwhile, which of the two has clocked up the most murdering of political opponents?

Something for you to think over. :)

(Just to be clear, I'm not suggesting that Castro was Stalin, but neither are his hands entirely clean)

 

Im not a massive Castro fan, just liked the joke☺ I did have a respect for him for at least trying to make communism work. In some ways, he did help the poor of cuba more than previous presidents!

And Trump hasnt even started yet! Give him a chance...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
26 minutes ago, zahidf said:

Im not a massive Castro fan, just liked the joke☺ I did have a respect for him for at least trying to make communism work. In some ways, he did help the poor of cuba more than previous presidents!

And Trump hasnt even started yet! Give him a chance...

I'll just point out that what I'm taking from your words is murdering for political purposes is more acceptable if the political purposes more-align with your own.

Which was precisely what I was suggesting you might want to think over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

 

DJT_Headshot_V2_bigger.jpg
Donald J. TrumpVerified account@realDonaldTrump

 

In addition to winning the Electoral College in a landslide, I won the popular vote if you deduct the millions of people who voted Democrat.

 

Sorted it for him

Edited by LJS
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...
  • Admin
24 minutes ago, Wooderson said:

People that think Trump wins those marginal rustbelt states without Russia/Comey involvement are a bit mad. What did she call him? A "puppet of Putin"? Darn tootin' he is.

oh c'mon .... it doesn't take russian involvement to win those rust states any more than it took russian involvement for the UK to vote for brexit.  In many ways they're both about the same thing, a forgotten class of people not being served by the dominant politics.

Once upon a time in the UK people used to mourn the loss of 'the post war consensus' that did have whichever party was in govt attempt to serve all of the people; there was an american version too, so very big that Nixon nearly introduced a form of 'basic income' - which isn't something you'll hear anyone from the right champion today.  That was replaced by Thatcherism (Reaganomics for the USA) where all of the focus was towards 'the wealth producers'.

What's so very fucking odd now is that there's huge numbers of people - people who want to regard themselves as progressive - who are now mourning the death of Thatcherism/Reaganomics and wanting it back!

There's better ways than all of those, but no one seems to want them. They won't happen until people do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was she a "great" candidate, no probably not. I'm not her biggest fan. But the margins in states that flipped for Trump don't indicate a broad shift. Small gains. People staying home. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
3 minutes ago, Wooderson said:

Trump won cause of "emails" chief. That's it.

Get out of here. All they did was confirm to those who already had no faith in Clinton that their take was well-founded.

1 minute ago, Wooderson said:

Was she a "great" candidate, no probably not. I'm not her biggest fan. But the margins in states that flipped for Trump don't indicate a broad shift. Small gains. People staying home. 

because (ITO) neither candidate was worth the effort.

When the polls show a close run, that's what it's going to be. The candidate that can inspire people to go and vote for them is the one that wins.

And like it or not, that's what Trump managed to do - by showing he didn't give a shit for the sort of political orthodoxy that had caused the USA to become what it has, which the people in those rust states had more reason to dislike than those in the 'boom' states.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Wooderson said:

Was she a "great" candidate, no probably not. I'm not her biggest fan. But the margins in states that flipped for Trump don't indicate a broad shift. Small gains. People staying home. 

From memory she didn't campaign in some of the swing states that she lost. Maybe that would have made a difference. In a tight election you can probably point to many factors which in isolation wouldn't make a difference, but when added together have an impact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They should have went for Sanders. The Democrats had the perfect opportunity to do so but they were blinded by their arrogance in effectively thinking Hilary would walk it.

If people were truly sick of the established politics he would have been the perfect candidate to go up against Turnip, even if he is the type of tree hugging, sandle wearing, smelly socialist that Americans traditionally fear

It still perplexes me how anyone from a minority group or any woman in that country voted for Trump. C'est la vie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Basement Jaxx 120 Billy Bragg 90 Chase & Status 150 MAX CMAT 150 MAX  Confidence Man 150 MAX David Byrne 150 MAX Everything Everything 130  Faithless 105 Fatboy Slim 100 Four Tet 120 Garbage 125  GOAT 10 (-5) Greentea Peng 125  Joy Crookes 110  Kneecap 120 Lorde 150 MAX The Maccabees 135  Nile Rodgers & Chic 150 MAX The Prodigy 150 MAX Pulp 150 MAX RAYE 65 Richard Ashcroft 110  Scissor Sisters 110  Self Esteem 150 MAX  The Streets 100  Super Furry Animals 95 (+5) Underworld 150 MAX Wolf Alice 150 MAX
    • My wife works for a music company, they have an allocation already.  They run a ballot for it early next year. 
    • This is my guess too.    2028 festival breaks the £400 barrier. 
    • Yeah I did spot that AXS had more available for the O2 shows Muse are doing, though I think that comes with the territory of AXS now being the venue's primary ticket selling platform.    My instinct remains they'll probably still play to a big crowd on the night - sales were similarly slow in 2023 but videos of those gigs showed the venue looking pretty much full. Equally it probably would be sold out if the pricing was even just slightly less ridiculous. Shave up to £50 off some of these categories and I think that would've got people to go with it. 
    • Some are definitely already there with that and with another round of inflation looking like it's on the way, it certainly locks that in. And I say that as someone who also isn't willing to break the £100 marker. 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...